september when you are given immunity that probably means you committed a crime. it's a bad predicate. as a legal proposition, it seems to me they have a point. the subpoena as far as it's been reported, asks for conversations with russian officials between january 16th, 2015 and january 20th, 2017 and for him to compile a list of any contacts he's had with russian officials. these are not business records. these are not preexisting records. they're asking him essentially to put together information that i think is tantamount to testimonial. in the webster hubble supreme court case, the court was clear about the distinctions between existing records of a business sort that cannot be privileged because corporations don't have that right and those which are testimonial in nature. so we'll see whether congress wants to just let this go or whether they want to hold him in