i can't say the definitively. i'm not aware of any communication. >> given what we know about clearance procedures and what's been reported multiple times the idea that white house council don mcgahn would not have known about the claims against porter, well, it's pro pos terrous. that makes the administration's obvious attempt at a cover-up all the more absurd. john kelly told aides and reporters he first learned about the extent of the allegations a week ago tonight and porter was gone 40 minutes later. we knew that was a lie because the white house was still defending him the following day and kelly himself telling reporters that day he stood by his statement he had drafted and put out calling porter who allegedly did this to his first wife as a face, a man of true integrity and honor. now, we know that's not all they did to support him. according to politico, in the hours of an that photo was published, the white house hastily arranged an off the record meeting in the west wing with who?