somehow limit the president's authority to revoke security clearances. because there isn't really a great deal of legal precedent for the packs the president has taken. and i think to the question of what might happen on capitol hill, mark warner, the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee did introduce an paemd would pre strength president from revoking security clearances. it's not clear that it would even come up for a vote let alone pass the senate. if he is going on start to strip more security clearances, then there may be more support for some sort of response. or at least being more clear on whether or not he has that authority. >> i think your point is exactly right. the president's comments about the discovery process and what could be learned, i think, go back to the time of lawsuit he is used to in new york and not the kind of legal case this would be if brennan goes forward with it.