Do scientists need an AI Hippocratic oath? Maybe. Maybe not.

Artificial intelligence has benefited humanity, but scientists also recognize the possibility for a dystopic outcome in which AI-powered computers one day overtake humans. Would an ethical oath for AI scientists avert this outcome? Or is such an oath too simplistic to be useful?

Related Keywords

Saudi Arabia , Canada , Toronto , Ontario , Greece , Canadian , Greek , Valerie Pasquarella , Stephen Hawking , Daniel Roy , Nikolas Siafakas , Roozbeh Yousefzadeh , Hirak Sarkar , Spiros Margaris , John Nosta , Philipk Dick , Google , Association For Computing Machinery Code Of Ethics , Tuskegee Institute , World Health Organization , Boston University , Harvard Medical School , United Nations , Association For Computing Machinery , Canadian Institute For Advanced Research , Us Public Health Service , University Of Toronto , European Union , Life Institute , University Of Crete , Google Health Advisory Board , Hanson Robotics , World War , Health Service , Computing Machinery , Professional Conduct , Lethal Autonomous Weapons , Canadian Institute , Advanced Research , Harvard Medical , Artificial Intelligence Act , Big Tech ,