Expanding the UN General Assembly's role in managing disarma

The Humanitarian Initiative's successful shift to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) has spotlighted deficiencies in the operational methods and practices of the NPT Review Process. Konstantin Larionov assesses specific aspects of the UNGA's proceedings that could enhance the performance of NPT meetings. He argues that expanding the roles and functions of the UNGA is crucial for advancing non-proliferation and disarmament commitments, which have faced decades-long obstacles within the NPT.

Related Keywords

Russia , United States , North Korea , Brazil , Argentina , America , Paul Meyer , Konstantin Larionov , First Committee , While The International Court , Prohibition Of Nuclear Weapons , Nuclear Weapon Non , Objectives For Nuclear Non , Group Of Governmental Experts , Nuclear Disarmament , Agenda Coalition , Un Security Council , Nuclear Weapon Non Proliferation Treaty , States Parties , Review Process , Treaty Mandated Review Conferences , Nuclear Non Proliferation , Action Plan , Humanitarian Initiative , United Nations Conference , Legally Binding Instrument , Prohibit Nuclear Weapons , Nuclear Weapons , Arms Trade Treaty , State Party , International Court , Non Proliferation Treaty , Advisory Opinion , General Assembly , Middle East , Arab State , Arab States , Non Aligned States Parties , New Agenda Coalition , Fissile Material Cut Off Treaty , Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty , Nuclear Weapon Free Zone , Latin America , Review Conference , Governmental Experts ,