Enormous president ial election. You want drama baby, i will give you 2020 prescription strength drama. Here at the very latest is Foxbusiness White house correspondents, the one and only blake burman. Like break it down, what just have embraced back either kennedy good to be with you. It was exactly one month ago september 26 when President Trump announced that he would be tapping Amy Coney Barrett to head to the Supreme Court of course to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader ginsburg. Now that is all beneficial at this hour. Here in washington. As the proceedings are underway. The white house is not yet said what will happen later this evening. However there is expected to be some sort of formal celebration over at the white house later this evening. Once everything has become official. As for President Trump, he was out on the campaign trail earlier today. Three different stops in pennsylvania. This is how he was celebrating his third Supreme Court nominee. Watch price to back that was a good choice wasnt it . I am glad shes not running for president i would much rather go get sleepy joe. Judge barrett is one of the most brilliant legal might show defend our rights, liberties and godgiven freedoms. Of coursers of democratic support in the senate whatsoever for Amy Coney Barrett sprayed they feel republicans are being hypocritical for how Coney Barrett has been treated in electionyear versus how Merrick Garland was can treated in the last election in 2016. As for joe biden, he made some comments earlier today, kennedy. And he focused on the accept affected celebration over the white house. Remember at the events in the rose garden about a month ago, that was believed to be a super sporadic, covid19 super spreader events. Participants there, very tight, no social distancing, masks were a rarity. Earlier today, this was what biden had to say about what we are expecting over at the white house. People should be tested first before they even show up. Number one. Number two, they should be wearing masks. Number three, they should be socially distant. And number four, it should not be a huge crowd. Whether it is outside or not. And as youve mentioned, once events move on over to the white house, the Supreme CourtJustice Clarence thomas is expected to administer the oath to Amy Coney Barrett. And he is eight conservative side, beloved. It will go from one generation to the next obviously he is it ideological standin for her mentor. The late justice anthonys glia. Thank you so much polite good reporting praise to back this confirmation could not come in a more usual time. A week before a nasty election during a spiking pandemic. But our democrats complaining too much . And are they making too big of a deal about her judicial record. Lets get straight to tonights party panoply look who weve go got, lgbt founder and right turn strategies president Chris Barrons ear along the coast of sincerely kat on fox nation. Shes also for the show kat timpf its here its her Birthday Week what . Weve got former aide to senator schumer. Also hosted the aggressive progressive podcast, Christopher Hahn is here. Its great to see you guys good to see face to back so cat and i get a talk for little bit we want you boys to fight first. So chris barron, do you think this secures the president s legacy in a way that even the most optimistic traps supporters could not have anticipated four years ago . Absolutely. Lets just be honest. Even if President Trump lost the election, which i do not think is going to happen. His legacy will be unmatched when it comes to transforming the judicial system in the United States. For a generation, conservatives have thought to move the courts to the right. And now Amy Coney Barretts confirmation tonight, we have a Supreme Court that is going to be ideologically different than the one we have seen for the last 30 years. It is actually going to defend the constitution. It is one that we can be proud of. No matter what happens on election day, President Trumps legacy is going to last an entire generation. Spirit. Kennedy . Christopher hahn, democrats feel different about that. The good old days would bruise Bader Ginsburg was confirmed, pretty much every senator was on board. But not one democrat votes. You think this almost Justice Barrett, shes not been sworn in quite yet. You think she should have declined the nomination . Christopher hahn go. I think shes allowing herself to be used as a political pawn. I would not call her appointment confirmation trumps attention trumps legacy its Mitch Mcconnells legacy. Doing so hes both damage the reputation of the court and really destroyed the senate. What he did four years ago he made his case, he said if this is why we cannot have a judicial appointments at this point in time, when it was way earlier in the election cycle. And now he is just ramped one through three this is the fastest confirmation in recent history. It is an amazing price back its not the fastest in history there but other confirmations. I said recent history, i corrected myself. And again, this is something that is going to really destroy the balance of the courts. And destroy the american peoples understanding of the court is a nonpolitical branch. Its amazing to me any moment take this appointment this point in time. Agenda before he could not imagine to me judges who would take the Supreme Court nomination. Like new growth, the president was like seriously irrational and fun . And you like that is much as the next which plays hop on the court . That kat doesnt this to show how hypocritical both parties are since they both completely switch sides in this argument . Rights for thought is really funny when democrats were calling republicans hypocrites. Not because of not hypocrites of the situation, yes they were. But so were democrats. So it is weird. Like arguing epic court squared if youre calling someone hypocrite when you are. There arguing the exact same thing. There arguing the exact same thing. For me people get so concerned whenever this happens. About their rights, and how this is going to change their lives. And i think that we should take a look at the system kinda from a larger, bigger, broader view. And say hey, maybe if power is so concentrated among such few individuals in this country that we actually have to worry about Something Like that, maybe we need to take a look at that. Id have the power be more individual. Kennedy yes i think thats what shes saying. Im glad you brought that up or select thank you for twisting my words to make the exact opposite points. That political party. [inaudible] its adding justices to the court for political reasons. Would go against what you were they making a political arm. You obviously know what i wanted to say. Kennedy chris hahn, chris hahn, chris hahn, dont talk when someone else is talking, we cannot do that with these fully digital panels. It is impossible. Youve given up your turn so im going to go to chris barron right now. Chris, the president wins reelection should he pack the court and expand the size of the Supreme Court . As much as i want to say yes, i am not insane so the answer is no. Of course we should not undermine the Supreme Court to attempt to supplant some sort of political agenda. I mean look, i understand why mr. Hahn is angry. That left has relied on the Supreme Court to do its unable to do the ballot boxes and the legislature for decades. And now theyre not going to be able to do that anymore. So i am sure hes mad. Im sure is completely and totally ticked off about it. But unfortunately that is the way it worked out. The voters voted for donald trump and elected him in 2016. Dissent was held in 2018 by a republican. As many times as you want to say jm or schama or ram, whatever arrives, sue laura k panel were going to return a little while later. Im not angry. Before i know you not angry thats why appreciate you. Cadigan talked about how classy my pearls are. That is coming up a little later sue should all hang around. First up we love liberty and the freedom on the kennedy show. So how might Justice Barrett rule on cases regarding your civil liberties, free speech, guns, mass surveillance. Here with me now that the director of Cato Institute and the author of the fantastic new book, supreme disorder. Ilyas imperial is back. We also have damon roots. Also it author. Welcome too both of you. I will start with you ilya. How might Justice Barrett be influential on the court . How does that work . Its great to be back first of all. Its great to have you back on foxbusiness, that is wonderful. I think shes going to be a very strong justice. Her chores proved in such a shutter academic writings indeed makes her similar to her late mentor, scalia. Then she takes the structure of the constitution seriously bristle weathers the freedom of speech, the Second Amendment the fourth amendment, justice kalil was a big friend of criminal defendants you might not know purge she had rulings on the seventh circuit that deny qualified immunity for example for Law Enforcement that violates constitutional rights. So ger gly g thi g s gs s g shgo togogo a batrehhf o fsh r. Ai to sar disngmipmip t t. T t t t think s mhtigige flinntial biain biaiahe nny ednterednttinged. Ting damso d lso ds tsoalksoal lite sabomabhe thing t ts s re mse dur dginhe coirmaon pss. Nt thrntgh nt ontnter hnd tre a cen rtingsthhe snoan. Nsw eds wur wedpr thaualified munity dni notniomot c up mor mm si e ee he t aut tr t o thatth opionononon. Whatwhat aut mas m survsullsuce . Suce i w very frustrate escially dallyocralyoc focus s s much omun dacaa tt te dototot nteeally impornt constitutionaltion iss involving government spying. Party or thoughts . The issue serenity fourth amendment, that is where the biggest things he Supreme Court is going to face in the coming year. Think the comparison to Justice Khalil is apt for soontobe justice acb. Likes khalil we can expect her to probably be strong in that area. That is certainly an area were conservative justices have and publishes on the right side of the issues. Absolutely. There also is not been a ton of discussion about libertarian views. Because there are many people in this country who do subscribe to original ism. Ilya, so how did she come down in terms of liberty . What what we expect specifically . It depends what aspects of liberty. In terms of the constitutional structure, because of course structure protects liberty. But theres a separation of powers of the accountable Administrative State does not go beyond its constitutional limits. Shes going to write their cabin on pushing back on that. They limited number of cases under chicagobased court. On the federal government passing laws that might go beyond its enumerated powers, i think she would be solid there. I have some questions about state laws that might infringe on the enumerated lights. Those that are not listed. Weathertight but economic liberties, privacy rights of various kinds. One of her famous articles that quoted a lot during her hearings was a review of randy barneys book, art republican constitution. Or she seemed to accept rational basis the idea that state governments at least can regulate without passing much of a constitutional smelter. That is something that may give concern, maybe relating to covid restrictions or some other things. But generally i think she will hold both bureaucrats and legislator feet to the constitution of fire. Kennedy quickly damon, what about her past writing a decision on in terms of chevron deference . Which is referring to federal agencies instead of the actual, perhaps a vague text of the law. Is that a concern for you . Im less worried about that. I would like to echo ilyas concern about liberty. She has writings and in fact exchange with setter josh hadley during her scent and her hearings and doors i think on the wrong historical view of the locker casing 1905. I think we should deafly be worried about her being too deferential to lawmakers when it comes to economic rights, economic liberties. And that is certainly something senator hawley does not have a problem with. Likes to see Big Government conservatism in the economic sphere. And that is an area were libertarian conservatives often disagree about the law. In the returns are right. The original meaning of the 14th amendment, and i think shes going to be wrong on that. I think one thing we can all agree on is Brett Kavanaughs going to Party Tonight super hard at the white house. And he is going to teach Justice Barrett to play the devils troika. Gentlemen think its a much we will rely on your expertise in the coming months free thanks again. Coming up this just eight days until the election on a bunch of poll suggests the race is tightening. Are the pollsters almost all wrong . Like they were 2016. What happens if they are what are we going to do them . Will tom breaks it down and breaks the tight next. [ beeping ] [ engine revs ] uh, you know theres a 30minute limit, right . Tell that to the rain. [ beeping ] for those who were born to ride, theres progressive. But when i started seeing things, i didnt know what was happening. So i kept it in. He started believing things that werent true. I knew something was wrong. But i didnt say a word. During the course of their disease around 50 of people with parkinsons may experience hallucinations or delusions. But now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. The only fda approved medicine. Proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions related to parkinsons. Dont take nuplazid if you are allergic to its ingredients. Nuplazid can increase the risk of death in elderly people with dementiarelated psychosis and is not for treating symptoms unrelated to parkinsons disease. Nuplazid can cause changes in heart rhythm and should not be taken if you have certain abnormal heart rhythms or take other drugs that are known to cause changes in heart rhythm. Tell your doctor about any changes in medicines youre taking. The most common side effects are swelling of the arms and legs and confusion. We spoke up and it made all the difference. Ask your parkinsons specialist about nuplazid. Ancestry, with documents, with photographs, i get to define myself through the scores of people who lead to me. Bring your Family History to life like never before. Get started for free at ancestry. Com kennedy some breaking news youre seeing here first. Senate republicans moments ago handing the president a major victory confirming Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Courts. We learned just before, it will become official tomorrow. And what a time for all this to happen. Unless youve been under iraq, and a flooded cave in uranus. You know theyre just eight days until the election. Candidates are their final push. So how might the Supreme Court conversation moved to undecided voters customer 22 break the numbers down, its executive editor tom bevan is back. This is such an exciting week. I know people are so invested in their candidates. For those of us to just follow the happenings like sports fans without a team. It truly is exciting. So tom, what kind of trends are you seeing this time around that are either exactly similar to or slightly different from 2016 that could give us pause. Lets start with the acb, Amy Coney Barrett confirmation. Im not sure this is going to move the numbers. The kavanaugh confirmation was so was so polarizing and really galvanize Republican Voters, right before the 2018 election. The process was so different it will remind Republican Voters why they like at donald trump. Right . This is one of the reasons they voted for him in the first place. It is a friendly reminder right before the election of one of the issues that really work in his favor. If you are sort of a squishy republican who was on the fence. But as far as the trends go, look, there are a lot of echoes that you thousand 16 how this race is shaping up. But there are a lot of differences. A couple differences here, joe biden is much more s favorable ratings much higher than Hillary Clinton at this time. For i have said that all along by the way the biggest asset joe biden has right now she is not Hillary Clinton. Im not saying that because what happened rice me crazy is its the truth. So many people came out and garage voted against Hillary Clinton. Its a truck really running against himself . The people who were so radically supporting him and so angry at him they cannot wait to mail in their ballot early . Thats one of the things hes income but now. Thats obviously a difference. There is not so much thirdparty support out there. So you were different than four years ago. Theres an enthusiasm gap, we see it on booktv every day with the rallies and booktv and check rates at all that. Trump supporters are wanting to turn out for their candidate. Democrats not as enthusiastic to turn out and chauffeured jump vote for joe biden. Kennedy are there more of them . Theres more of them but negative partisanship. W