It looks like bidens legal team is going to try to force the government to abide by the original and totally ludicrous deal. Their statement said that hunter will continue to follow the conditions of that agreement on july 20th, 20233. That the Probation Office had agreed to and had recommended put into effect. If the Court Upholds whether as called this pretrial Diversion Agreement. I think its unlikely, hunter would skate charge or any other tax evasion charges that stem out of that same time period. Here to break this all down. Other breaking news Sol Wisenberg former deputy independent counsel, Fox News Contributor and david schoen former trump impeachment lawyer. Explain to us what is going on here. I think this came as a surprise to some people today that indeed the walls may be closing in and not on trump this time. It shouldnt have been a surprise because he is under, you know, there is a criminal investigation filed against hunter on the gun charge, and so Speedy Trial Act comes into play. And after a certain amount of days the government has to indict him and so thats what the judge pointed out on august 31st. She said to the parties, hey, whats going on and today the government said were going to indict him by september 29th. Laura david, four hunters counsel to be saying no, no, no, no, no. We are abiding by this other agreement that the judge seemed blind sided by whether it was first presented to the court. How does that hold up . Well, you know abbe lowell is one of the most experienced Criminal Defense Lawyers in the country. You can sure he recognized what you call a Sweetheart Deal for exactly what it was. He will fight Tooth And Nail to try to enforce it. The United StatesSupreme Court case from 1971 santa bella vs. New york that allows a defendant to move for specific performance, make the plea deal happen. Based on representations made by the prosecution. But its going to be a tough way to go in this case, i think, because, remember, it fell apart because there clearly was not a meeting of the minds between the defense team and the government in that case that required one of his lawyers, mr. Clark to withdrawal because is he going to be a witness. They will certainly have a Battle Over Whether to enforce that Plea Agreement or not. I think abbe lowell is right to try to enforce that remember, also, the judge never had to accept it. The judge could have rejected that plea as she did and wanted to do additional consideration of it. I think thats going to be a tough battle. Im skeptical of the whole process. Im skeptical of anything that happens with mr. Weiss now. I think that was a Sham Appointing him as special counsel. I think abbe lowell if push comes to shove is going to challenge that appointment. Violates 600. 3. Special counsel. I think you will see all kinds of battles if they dont allow him to enforce the agreement. Laura sol, whats your take on that . My gut is its so ridiculous that even in this court it wouldnt be accepted and they wouldnt be able to go with it. Am i seeing this incorrectly . Well, first of all, i think david meant to say he referred to the Plea Agreement. I think he meant the diversification agreement. Both sides agree the Plea Agreement is off. I think there might be i might be a little in a different position than david on this. I think they have got a real shot at enforcing the Diversion Agreement. Abbe lowell and the hunter biden defense team if they do thats the end of the story for the gun charges, not only that, if that broad immunity provision in the Diversion Agreement is valid, they are not going to be able to prosecute hunter for any tax crimes. Because it clearly covers other tax offenses. David, think about that. We have this trail, albeit kind of difficult, sometimes, to follow. But through all these, you know, you know, Shell Corporations and all these accounts, that ultimately end up getting funneled back to the biden family. Now, was all that income declared. We had a lot of fake email addresses used in this time period as well. Was the income declared . I dont think we know the answer to that, do we . We do not. I dont think we scratched the surface on all that was going on in machinations with the biden family. I dont know that we ever will the other reason by the way this gun charge is a sham, they well know about the Raheemy Decision in the fifth circuit. Thats a decision that, you know, threw out a Bar Gun Possession based on the Domestic Violence problem. So, here, its not a big reach. In fact, one might say its less onerous to say we are not going to be able to uphold conviction for saying unlawful drug user on this application that the right to carry a firearm or possess a firearm trumps that under bruin so on and so on. I think the whole thing is for show, personally. Laura even cnn seems to be catching on and maybe admitting hunters legal woes may go a little deeper. Watch. There is a question about whether this investigation would broaden further or whether there are other potential crimes that are now back on the table. They brought up the potential, you know, Foreign Agent dealing so, look, hunter biden now has a host of problems that he didnt have or didnt think he had a couple weeks ago. Laura sol, they want this to go away. They dont want this flying around next year during the election because it taints biden. I dont care what anyone says the biden family got rich during this time period. He is in Public Service for 50plus years. Obviously, if the son is doing well is he very happy and looks like Influence Peddling to most people who have any common sense. Heres another reason they dont want it to happen, laura, lets say that the courts hold that the Diversion Agreement is off and the government can prosecute, weiss can prosecute hunter for either being on drugs when he purchased the gun or lying about it. Under the Diversion Agreement they didnt charge him with lying and buying. They could still charge him with that if they do it by october 12th. Lets say they do that, whats hunter going to do . He is going to go into court and say under the bruin decision of the Supreme Court, this is unconstitutional. You cant charge me. Laura, thats the same decision that President Biden said was an affront to common sense. An affront to the constitution. Laura that was yesterday. His own son is going to be arguing a different position. It isnt going to be pretty. Laura yeah, so, david, they rely on precedent that President Biden previously slammed. Thats just kind of par for the course here. Both sides do that but, in the end, i think this does it pass the straight face test, the smell test for most americans watching this . You guys are incredibly experienced white collar litigators. You understand how this process works for most americans watching this its kind of confusing. They will kind of get what is going on. Will this be something that ultimately as a political matter, regardless of what happens on the legal side as a political matter does damage joe biden . I think there is that very real possibility. Depends on how long it drags on, also. I think the American People have seen enough of this if its going to tarnish it than it already has. I think hunter is a pitiful case unfortunately. I dont know that anybody has any interest in seeing this prosecution. The question is how much of the underlying facts is going to be investigated and exposed . I dont think, again that, we have even scratched the surface. Thats the real political risk, i think. Laura i think the left has just decided its perfectly fine for the bidens to become multi millionaires while he is in office. They have no problem with that. Meanwhile, sol, something you and i have talked about before, but its gaining traction as you and i predicted it would. This Group Called Citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington. I love it, called crew. Filed this lawsuit to bar former President Trump from the primary ballot in colorado arguing he is ineligible to run from the white house citing the 14th Amendment. This is going to be replicated elsewhere. The Attorney General in colorado has said she is waiting for further clarifications, ultimately going to go to the Supreme Court what of this now. Private groups and private citizens might have a standing problem. But i think one of these state Attorney Generals or even under their Theory A County Official is going to make the decision to leave trump off the ballot. Its going to go to the Supreme Court i think fairly rapidly and i think they are going to rule that you cannot take former President Trump off the ballot without some kind of enabling statute and a judicial finding. As i have pointed out before, there is a statute on the books, a criminal statute prohibiting insurrection or rebullion and saying that if you are guilty you cant run you can no longer hold office. To me, thats the application of that 14th Amendment provision section 3, Congress Passed that almost a century ago. Maybe more than a century ago. I think thats the way the court is going to come down. You cant just have an official deciding trump should be off the ballot. And a court deciding that without any kind of factual basis. Laura yeah. The great defenders of democracy, david, quickly. Quite frankly justice chase said that in griffins case in 1869. He said congress has to act. Its not selfexecuting. These two Law Professors who wrote the article in the Pennsylvania Law Review Have said otherwise. They recognize griffins case is a problem for them. They just say its wrongly decided they have concluded there are many, many reasons why i dont think this applies. Laura sol and david, thank you so much. Now, up next, congress is ramping up its investigations into hunter and joes ties. So what have they just discovered . House Oversight Committee chair james comer is here. All the details. You have dont want to miss it, next. Most . Introducing Power Homeschool the official provider of online acellus courses for parents independently homeschooling their children. I really love how flexible the program is. It allows my child to work at her own pace and on her own schedule. Join the growing community of parents who have discovered the power of Power Homeschool. Visit our website at Power Homeschool dot org to learn more and start your childs educational journey. Heres why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your Devie Duckduckgo comes with a builtn engine like google, but its pi and doesnt spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. And theres no catch. Its fre. We make money from ads, but they dont follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today. All right. Tonight, we have brand new details on how joe i never talk Business With My Son Biden did talk about hunters Business Dealings and as Vice President had his office involved. House Oversight Committee chairman james comer today demanding that the National Archives provide unredacted emails and documents related to the Vice President s office colluding with the biden family and their business associates. Heres one example. December 4th, 2015. Hunters longtime Business PartnerEric Schwerin wrote to then v. P. Comms director Kate Bedingfield a quote she could use regarding his work with burisma she responded v. P. Signed off on this. And that she would provide a statement from joes office on burisma as well. So, how could joe biden, who claims he has never spoken to his son about his Business Dealings, which we never believed, sign off on quotes about those dealings . Even the White House Press corps thought something is fishy here today. How do you respond to criticism that that show theres was no wall between then vice President Bidens work and his Family Business dealings . I understand the question. I appreciate the question. I get the question. Im just going to let the white House Counsel team answer the question. I bet she is. Joining me now house Oversight Committee chair james comer, congressman, you and i have suspected this all along, Something Else though happened the same day the white house received that email. What was it . Well, the meeting. And we have had testimony and there is emails, there is more evidence of more meetings where hunter was told that they needed to Call Washington for help. We have had devon archer testify and say that. Theres evidence that points to the burisma executives were squeezing hunter biden to Call Washington for help. So we know that hunter biden was communicating with the white house. This email that you just posed d was one of many and we believe there are more that the archives are sitting on where the biden the hunter Biden Legal Team. The hunter biden pr people, the Hunter Biden Shady characters who were paying him were communicating through him to his father back and forth. There was no wall between joe biden and h his son hunter biden and his shady Business Dealings. Laura the meeting among the burisma executives happening clearly they needed a lifeline of some sort or some type of reassurance and its your contention or supposition at this point that at that Point Hunter Kicked in got word through shearn to the comms director, Will Comms Staffer at the white house and then she sought to reassure saying, yes, the Vice President has signed off on these quotes. Thats what you are seeing so far . Hunter biden has been in trouble for a long time. Burisma was a corrupt energy company. Thats why shokin, the ukrainian prosecutor was investigating for the first place. Remember, shokin even seized some assets from the owners of burisma in other countries. This is a corrupt entity. The press was picking up on this. And the biden hunters legal team, hunters pr people whoever they were were communicating back and forth with joe biden who was Vice President so they can be an official Government Position on this. An official government statement to the press corps reassuring everyone that everything was fine and, you know, everything was on the up and up. This is further coordination between hunter biden and the federal government and joe biden. And, remember, we believe there is coordination between the Department Of Justice and the coverup. There is two crimes here, the actual Biden Corruption and then the coverup. And all along the way, there have been people coordinating, people representing hunter biden who were paying hunter biden. People who were representing him in court. People who were in trouble just like hunter biden for crimes. And they were communicating back and forth with our federal government to cover up this crime and to make sure that they could spin the false narrative. Laura congressman, how deep could this go . How many people were involved in covering this up so it wouldnt come out, wouldnt come out during the Obama Administration and toward the end of it, certainly wouldnt come out when biden was running for president. How many people are we talking about, do you think . Well, lets start at the top. We know Merrick Garland has come the National Archives not to cooperate with u