Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
better than another. i think it's one of the reasons why you need some sort of technical, nonpolitical body, maybe a couple of them to judge these things. i like the idea of a national infrastructure bank that might be like the world bank, which does countries, would have technical experts who wouldn't necessarily decide things, but at least give a point of view, to say what are really the benefits, what are the likely costs? we need a way to do that. there are just thousands and thousands of different projects all competing for the same money. >> and that's often the criticism. these things if you have an infrastructure if it becomes political, people will want it in their districts. people are going to tweet me to say that was amazing. i love that we're doing this, i love that we're building that tough and i'm going to get as many tweets from people who say i have nothing to do with new york, i'm never going to use the second avenue subway. why is $1.3 billion going into this. how do we decide what we should