Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
the transcript, or the summary that we saw. this now alleges that the lawyer at the nsc is the one who made the call to put it in a more secure place. does this by your reading, andrew, imply any guilt or innocence or any conclusion? >> well, my first thought is that it corroborates the whistle-blower's complaint even further. you'll recall that the third most central point that the whistle-blower complaint was making was that there was an effort to shield the contents of the president's conversation with president zelensky by putting it onto a classified server, that usually those transcripts do not go on. and yesterday of course we learned late last night, rather, after vindman testified for more than ten hours behind closed doors that he was trying to sort of get a more correct version of the transcript out there in terms of the one that was released publicly including adding references to burisma, of course the ukrainian energy company where hunter biden served on the board of. and he was trying to essentially make it more accurate so that the public could get an accurate reading of it. but he was essentially -- he was