Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
keeping these documents in his basement caused actual harm. so if avril haines and his review finds the source is compromised, or signals intelligence as -- was discovered, that is a critical part of convincing the jury to prosecute. i'm, sorry to convict trump. otherwise he will, say i sat in my basement. his defense lawyers would say there is no real harm here. it is critical on multiple levels with the intelligence community finds. >> charlie, you tweeted in response to this, normally this would be a damage assessment, which they knew after a leak to the public or theft by i spy. but it is clear that the classified information was compromised. this is a risk assessment because it is unknown if any bad actor got to the docks or they just sat there and secure but on the lasted. i understand that the conversation between the two, may, as david just said, bear on what gets done with donald trump and what merrick garland does.