Among other things, the contract provides that one party cannot use the "cryopreserved material'' to create a child without the written consent of the other person, according to the suit. Loeb's lawyers maintained in their court papers that the contract was a "form directive'' that is void and against public policy because it does not comply with California law since it lacks a provision dealing with what happens in case of a divorce or separation. The judge disagreed. As many who've had their first COVID-19 vaccination prepare for their second shot, a new study underway in the U.K. could make getting that dose much easier.