Mastercard judgment 'lowers bar' for collective action | Ne

Mastercard judgment 'lowers bar' for collective action | News


By Jemma Slingo2020-12-11T15:42:00+00:00
The Supreme Court’s ruling against Mastercard will make it easier for group damages claims to proceed to trial, commentators have said. However, the card issuer’s solicitors have stressed the ‘very unusual circumstances’ of the judgment, in which justices were divided on key issues.
In a widely awaited judgment, the Supreme Court today
dismissed Mastercard’s appeal, finding that a 2017 Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) judgment was undermined by errors of law. The case has now been remitted to the tribunal for reconsideration.
In 2017 the CAT refused to certify the case, which is brought by former financial services ombudsman Walter Merricks CBE on behalf of 46 million credit and debit card holders. It is the first major opt-out action brought under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and is believed to be the largest damages claim ever brought in the UK, at an estimated £14bn.

Related Keywords

United Kingdom , Covington Burlington , V Walter Hugh Merricks , Rocio Concha , Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer , Mark Sansom , Supreme Court , Mastercard , Appeal Tribunal , Walter Merricks , Consumer Rights Act , Walter Hugh Merricks , Lord Kerr , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , கோவிங்டன் பர்லிங்டன் , வ் வால்டர் ஹக் மெர்ரிக்ஸ் , ரோஸிஓ கொஞ்ச , குறி ஸ்யாந்‌ஸம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , மாஸ்டர்கார்டு , முறையீடு தீர்ப்பாயம் , வால்டர் மெர்ரிக்ஸ் , நுகர்வோர் உரிமைகள் நாடகம் , வால்டர் ஹக் மெர்ரிக்ஸ் , ஆண்டவர் கெர் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana