That, he said, is “measly” compared with the number of registered voters. While we appreciate his drawing the public’s attention to our database (now up to 1,328 cases), Hammer left out some vital information. Significantly, he omitted the fact that, as prominently stated in its introduction, the database presents a “sampling” of election fraud cases and “is intended to highlight cases of proven fraud and the many ways in which fraud has been committed.” The introduction continues: It does not capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances or allegations of election fraud, some of which may be meritorious, some not, that are not investigated or prosecuted.