Solid space walks. Thats all for this our stay tuned for more news here on our T International and just about 30 minutes the the power body. Im rick sanchez. This is direct impact on this is what were going to be talking about. A need to be able to stop these russian attacks that are coming from bases inside russia. So i think theres also a question of whether we the United States and our allies, or to give them more health in hitting russian bases, which here to, for, weve not been willing to do their, you know, bomb russia. So says victoria, new. And if you think that suggestion to bomb russia, sounds crazy. Wait till you hear what else . Victoria nolan had to say, im going to play it for you. Im rick sanchez. Lets do it the. All right, lets start with this very important conversation going on in the United States right now. In fact, it couldnt possibly be any more important. My gosh, think about this. Its about whether the people of the United States that involves me and maybe some of you are watching right now. Want to start a war with restaurant seriously, whether you want, do you want to start a war with russia . Do you really want to start a war with russia . I would say that that would be possibly the beginning of world war 3. But if youre thinking about that, you probably might be right or at least asking a good question to yourself. Heres, heres the deal, and heres why im asking the question and an imposing all of this ukraine has recently been bombing and killing civilians in a russian border city that its, thats named belgrade. You probably dont know that if you happen to live the United States, because the media here doesnt report that. But because of that, russia has tried to create or says its creating this safe zone inside of ukraine in a place called cock off. Some would call it hark off the ukrainians, call it car key, whatever, to try and stop the bombing. So the russians are moving into that area to stop the bombing, because thats where the missiles are being used to fire and to bounce around the the follow that. Ok. And theyre doing it by hitting that area right there near the russian border. Well, so the us secretary of state. Uh, pardon me, the us secretary of defense, i misspoke lloyd austin was asked recently if you crane should now be allowed to use us weapons the weapons made here in the United States to bomb russia. Right. In mind you, they already are bombing rush. I mean, theyre already doing it, but regardless lets, lets pretend theyre not right. So when lloyd austin was asked this question, he said no, heres the headline. This is what you can read right about. Now i think this is a b c news, but everybody picked it up. As you can see, what general austin is saying is that theres an expectation by him that when he gives you crane weapons or when United States gives you crane weapons, they will be used inside them ukraine only. They would not be used to attack russia, which kind of makes sense, right . We dont want to be given somebody weapons and then theyre shooting them off and getting china or rush on. Right. So obviously not to the us media though. See the us media doesnt find this obvious which, which is even you could almost argue that there are members of the media and United States that are more, were hungry. Then the us general himself, the guy whos in charge of the defense department. Like like people and cnn and stuff like that they, they almost are more of yeah, hawks. Then people even at the state department are believe it or not it its, its obvious. Just watch the news so. So these folks, in this case i think it was a b, c. They sought out their favorite people to talk to after the secretary general, secretary of defense, pardon me. Said no, we dont want ukraine bombing russia. They made a phone call to victoria nolan, victoria nolan, who is an unabashed russia hating war hawk . And she suggested, yeah, we should encourage ukraine to bomb russia. She never mentioned that ukraine has already been bombing russia. She never talks about bell gerad. So heres new and being asked if you crane should bomb russia with us weapons, listen to what you said and, and do you think they should a i think this, the attacks are coming directly from over the line in russia that those bases ought to be fair game, whether they are where missiles are being launch from, or where they are, where our troops are being supplied from. I think its time for that because russia has obviously escalated this war, including as you said at the beginning, attacking rush, the 2nd city har keys, which is not on the front lines and trying to designate it without ever having to put a boot on the ground so i think it is time to give the ukrainians more help hitting the space as inside russia to listen to it to say, i feel like im doing the daily show here instead of a new shot. Because this is almost like funny. How ridiculous it is. That she uses the fact that russian soldiers and Russian Troops come from russia. Therefore, ukraine should attack russia because Russian Troops and russian soldiers and russian art i, munitions, come from wherever. How else could they come from and darted good foot . Raising the news, we should attack rushed up because the troops and the soldiers in the guns and the ammunition and the weapons that are being used on your great and couple of mazda, of course, that come from russia. By the way, what she is suggesting is an all out were with russia and martha ravaged, the woman whos interviewing or she doesnt even push back. Its like, oh, okay, thats what you mean. Okay. Manila that, i mean, did you pick up on any of this a well, rec, if we apply the same reasoning that victoria new and use their, then the 20 years that the United States occupied afghanistan, it would have given the taliban, the right to wire off missiles or use their, you know, theyre, uh, whoever supporting them the taliban to fire rockets off this way to mainland United States. So that kind of rhetoric is nothing more than trying to continue more and more bloodshed. She was saying, how, you know, in the rest of it, that interview saying how we didnt move fast enough. We, as in the United States and congress didnt move fast enough to supply more arms. As we know, there was a contingent of republican congress, people who were holding back, holding the line from giving for aiden arms to, to below the mirrors, the landscape. However, the rest of that sound like rick, i think, is important to note. If you ever want to know why war is a racket, victoria knew and wraps up her interview by saying that, by the way, most of this ukraine aid is coming right back to the Defense Industry as provides the good jobs in more than 30 states. Here in the United States, martha, lets start a war with russia because it will provide great jobs for americans here, the United States, and then well all die during world war 3, but we have the ap rec can make it up really well. We made some good money before we died, right. My goodness. By the way, victoria mueller. And let me just add one more thing before we go. Stop. Dont move the teleprompter yet because were not going to move on to the next story. Theres something i should say, and i always forget the savings, but this important way to start a war with russia. Right. And so Many Americans dont know this either. Let me just say that is because this is important. They have more Nuclear Warheads than we do. One more time, they have more Nuclear Warheads, then we do. Wouldnt be smart to start a war with one says, i wouldnt before it. What do you say . Let me know later by the way, inventory, a new it doesnt start world war 3. Theres always these old white guys in the us congress are willing to do it. Are you ready for this Southern Congress . Men are proposing that idea of soldiers receive the same benefits of us soldiers enjoy, which essentially means that theyre expanding the us military to include israels military. Again, i am making this up. Heres what it says, let me read it to get victor put this up on the screen. Look at that, see that . As you can see, it says the service of a citizen of the United States in the idea of will be treated in the same manner as the services of a soldier in uniform services. How in the hell do you think this will be received around the world . If we literally say that from now on, the us army and the israeli army will be one of the same, which is what these congressmen, thank god is not the entire congress. Is just a couple of guys. Were proposing this one to suggest, but no a well rec source. After i finished rolling my eyes, we should say that this is a clickable to roughly 20000 dual citizen american slash is rarely people that are currently serving in the id for member service. And the idea is mandatory if compulsory, if you maintain a and is rarely passport. Now that said, i take personal ambridge to this stupid ridiculous bill. I am the wife of a veteran who is permanently disabled. And for years and years and years, we always hear how the v a doesnt have enough resources to do a or to do b. We cant take care of our veterans because of this matter, the other thing. But now youre saying you want to spread those limited resources to people who im there. Theyre granted. Theyre also americans, but they never served in the us military. Yeah, these are the tools citizens serving in a foreign military. And the resources are as limited as a claim. They are for our own veterans who works tens of thousands of them homeless, starving, dying on the street, dog, drug addicted. We cant serve them after theyve served this country. But now you want to give those limited resources away to people serving elsewhere. Its absolutely ridiculous. Those people should resign. You think it will make a lot of americans angry, but its also gonna make a lot of people overseas angry. I cant imagine the people in the middle east are not going to look at this and saying, oh, so basically what youre saying is the United States and israel are now one country. And if israel is going to take us on, including a rod which would be hearing with very big years at this conversation, theyre going to say that essentially you guys are taking us on to, i just cant see this ending up in any way other than like a freaking disaster or a catastrophe is absolutely this of the optics of this alone. Rick shows that were walking in lock step and further supports the ongoing genocide. No matter what they say that this is an agenda side. This i think supports that in that were not no longer tacitly supporting it. Were actively supporting it. Yeah, good point. All right, thanks. But when we come back, by the way, sam will say we care about sam. Hes an independent journalist who covers the state department. You know, whats great about sam and he, and i are going to be talking here in just a little bit. In fact, i think youre going to see him here. There is, i say im, how are you . You know, its clear, but you know, whats cool about this got, he is not a laptop. So many journalists are he asked tough questions. That often makes state Department Officials seem both foolish, nervous, maybe even a little hypocritical, maybe even a lot have a critical. Weve got an example of exactly what were talking about when we come back, stay right there. Of the russian states. Never as one of the most sense Community Best english. Ill send send up the in the 65. Lets do the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin mission, the state on the russians cruising and split the ortiz full neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the senior said this was a request which is the what is part of it that the employee would post that isnt the defense you of us and that in the word part is it something deeper, more complex might be present during that stop without collision. Is that spelled out of the welcome back. Im rick sanchez and ive been doing this for so long and i always enjoy when somebody does real journalism. So i want to place something here for you in just little bit. This is a, heres the state department. Can i say lackey . Hes kind of a lackey, you know, somebody is paid to. Hes kind of like a p r guy. Matt miller, right. He says, hes saying, how dare the icpc, the International Criminal court. The International Criminal court came out recently and criticized is real, a master benjamin that the guy whos arrest right for what . 40000 people who are dead. 15217000 children who are dad the, you know, to alleged uh, genocide, a country trying to get rid of all the people who happen to be palestinians who live in that area. At least theres really accusations, right . So the icbc is making the case and they say budget mentioned nothing. Yeah. Who should be arrested for that . Well, youre gonna hear matt miller essentially say all will the i c, c doesnt know what the hell is talking about how they are. They Say Something like that, they have no place to be saying Something Like that. And at the end, youre going to hear sam who say needs voice. My guest, asking matt miller, a really good question here it is. United states fundamentally rejects the announcement today from the prosecutor of the International Criminal court that he is applying for arrest warrants for senior is really officials together with warrants for him off terrace. First of all, the israel has its own investigation. Second, we have accountability mechanisms here we have processes that are ongoing to look at israels compliance with International Humanitarian law. So there are places to look at these questions. Its just in our, in our view, fundamentally not or role of the i, c, c. Theres us get is not have drawers to, is there a different quote i wasnt referring to criminal jurisdiction about there was different ways to look at this long term. We agree with you that the policy and people should be a state that has the and have the ability to make these determinations. But thats not where we are today. Thats what were trying to get to your fine was the i see, see going after the so no time slot, you are fine with the eyes. Easy going after russia in no time flat. But now to continue the question, when they go after israel, how dare they . Oh bill they go after israel. Yes, go after russia. Go after china, go after any country we dont like. But if you go up to our country, we like, then youre not a Real Organization and youre breaking all the rules. I mean, its a, its, i hate to say it, but my gosh, how hypocritical can you be . Family saying hes an independent voice, but you should consider subscribing to hes im sub stopped by the way. Hes on subs doc under the heading, whos saying sam could see it again. My friend, how are you . Good to be with you. Right. Thanks. So what happened after you asked him that question where you said you were so, you know, you were fine with russia doing it, but now youre not. What do you say . What happened . The only ignore me is low to call on me terribly often. Um, um but, but i had what i thought the effect would be later on. Not miller v solve briefly there the a p reporter was more independent than most us journalists, although sometimes he, you know, ask some questions from august perspective. Yeah. As well, he is not, you know, i, i, hes different from me but hes better than the vast majority. Make sure the reporters, he picked up on it and started asking them regarding russia and what, what you ended up having is at the beginning, miller was falsely saying that is that uh uh they, they dont apply the i, c, c, a. In the case of israel palestine because it is ro, isnt a party and they claim that house isnt a party either because its not a real estate. Welf. I mean the u. S. Can have that position, but its a meaningless possession of israel. Palestine is a member of the i, c c it, you know, you go to the, i see, see, web page, its listed, palestine, the state of palestine is, are joined in 2015. I even did the screenshots on my latest piece there. So theres no why is that . So hes saying look, that they have no right to do this in defense of palestine because palestine is not a member, is not a real state, per se, at least according to the i c. C. Youre here to tell us, yes they are. So that means youre not at all that millers lie or, or hes ignoring millers lying and saying that its not a real member of the i c, c, the i c c says its a damn we own member is a state of palestine on their web page they joined in 2015. Thats an outright lie. And then later on uh he, uh, uh he uh, uh, claimed later on, matt, matt lee picked up on my questioning. So so, so just to get something resolved. Matt lini is the reporter for a t. Matt miller is the, the, the, the, the talking head who represents the state department of the United States. So. 6 levy is asking matt miller, what questions go ahead. Right, keep, keep followed up on my question in saying, what about russia and the i c c. Because you know, you, youre saying that, you know, israel isnt a party in russia, it isnt a party. So whats the difference here . Why, why are you accepting it in one and rejecting it and then other, and he says, well, the difference is that ukraine is ukraine, is a member, is, are they . Well, theyre not white again, the light on both sides of the equation, deep sleep claim, the palestine wasnt a member. And then he falsely claimed that ukraine was that, maam, and of course it had of course, backed up picked up by the New York Times and abc news and cnn. And theyre all now letting us know that there are people at the state department who are lying to us who live here in the United States. That happened right. Course that happened. Yeah. And thatll work. Thatll work. Nobody picked up one thing, nobody picked on it in the room. I had actually left the room at that point. I mean, i had, you know, its kind of hard what i hollered, you know, to attempt to intercede in the situation.