The court said Wohlfeil’s order was unfair to state and county officials, who were not expecting the judge to include restrictions on restaurants in the case and had not been given the chance to justify them, and that the injunction itself was too vague. Advertisement “In sum, the trial court erred by entering an overbroad injunction that was unsupported by the law and which violated the due process rights of the State and County,” Associate Justice Patricia Guerrero wrote in a 47-page opinion. Wohlfeil’s injunction was in effect for only a few days before the state got the appeals court to issue an emergency stay. During the brief window of time, some restaurant owners reopened their businesses to allow in-person dining, while others — more wary that the injunction would be short-lived — remained closed.