Transcripts For SFGTV Government Access Programming 20171203

Transcripts For SFGTV Government Access Programming 20171203

Opportunity to go out to the pu . Or would you prefer to actuallye this item into our january meeto give you time to do public outrh around this . I appreciate that concern, bi know that we had a workshop thae members of the public were in tm and were able to see things fle. But in the interest of transpari think it would be beneficial inr that we have a public workshop,n we could finalize any decision n january. So perhaps we could continue thm that we would schedule, we ask r or we could ask staff to scha Public Meeting and i could perhg in a facilitator to work with uk at the items weve discussed ane them even further so that when n work next year, that staff se an idea of how we might direct n scoping the projects out. Supervisor fewer are you maa motion to continue this item unr meeting . January to allow for a time to c transparency . I would. Then also included in that, i we to direct staff, if it pleases e chair, to schedule the meeting r december for a public workshop. Commissioner ronen, do you hy comments on that . Supervisor ronen this wouldt you . Not a special meeting of laft an opportunity for me in my capn a public seat that i would engae members of the public so we coua broader input that we would brik to this body. And i would present to this bode vote on future agenda items in. Supervisor ronen that woulde fantastic. Supervisor fewer that is wol for you to do that. I believe there is a motion on r to continue this item until ourg in january. I think you made the motion. I did. Second. This is moved by commissionek and seconded by commissioner ro. Without objections, the commiss sorry, that we will reschedule m to be heard in january. Thank you very much. To the chair, just a word abe meeting in january. Does this body have an inclinato when in january they would likee january meeting to occur . Or is that something i would woh the chair on . Call of the chair. Thank you. Then on the date certain meei can work with the chair on whatt date would be. Okay. Thank you. Supervisor fewer so without objection, the commission authoe meeting to be at the kawflt chai mean, this item to be continuede call next meeting which is ie call of the chair. Thank you very much. Madam clerk. Would you please call item six. Clerk discussion of possibls for on e obtaining executive ofr services for the commission ande direction of staff. I believe we have a brief presen from Teresa Strickler and our a, is that correct . Through the chair to the commissioners, angela calvillo. I am the interim officer, admine officer and clerk of the board. At our last meeting, you heard m Teresa Stricker our legal counct brought to you an option in yout today. There was a memo associated to e you options. In addition to that, since the t meeting, we have looked at an alternative to those options whh comprise a request for qualifics which would bring to you optionf individuals once we said what ts or minimum qualifications would. Once they qualified and metropoe mqs, then a group of individualr agency could come before you anu could determine which to choose. You wouldnt be subjected to a e that an rfp is subject to per t rules. Points could be granted if thera subcontractor involved. So the option is we essentiallye the scope of services and contrt duties similar to what you havey in the rpf. We can provide that document tor the chair if the panel wanted te the chair the authority to makee decision on the mqs and contract duties, you have them buff. You have them before you and we could loh teresas Legal Council. It could get out on the street a matter of two weeks. So it is an opportunity that yod utilize today and it could get u thinking about a group of indivs who might meet the qualificatior the chair or the commissioners e from after the holidays immediay beginning in january. So available for any questions. Are there any questions . I do have a question. When you mentioned the minimum qualifications, youre talking t whats in the draft rpf which ce an rfq on pages 4 and 5 . Yes, commissioner. Thank you. Supervisor fewer okay. Commissioner ronen . Any comments or questions . Supervisor ronen no. Supervisor fewer lets openp for Public Comment. Im jed again. My only comment is im not suree timeframe for these options. We have a strong interest in mae that cca matters are being moniy lafco staff in the manner that e been for a number of reasons. One is Public Education in termf happenings. Liaison role between the publice puc. I would say that having gone tof sfpuc meetings, the commission e good analysis on the presentatim their staff from the lafco staf. As you heard from mr. Brooks, ts aggressive legislation that is p every session at this point. And we didnt even mention in an to regionalization, there was sc ccakilling legislation that tha folks are working on. But it would be great to have ty and county in this capacity of o monitoring as they previously d. If there is some way to both isr kind of longterm actual plan fn executive staffer as well as sod of short term stuff getting in e right away and fill in3me the o make sure were not missing somn january when bills are getting introduced. I think that would be advantage. Supervisor fewer thank you y much. Good afternoon again. Eric brooks San Francisco green. Our city, californians for enere clean energy advocates. I wear a lot of hats. I would second what mr. Holtsmad which is that we need somebody n hopefully in january. I hope that would be a permanent executive officer. Based on where this lafco seemse headed, what you need is a gene, not a specialist. And i think that the cal lafco r said something to that effect ie workshop. You need someone like former exe officer fried who has the abilio encapsulate all the issues as a coordinator, then hire out to specialists for a specific contt needs for things like cca 2. 0, y choice 2. 0 and that kind of thi. I want to reiterate, i think nol do you need a generalist, we net only do you need a generalist. We need that generalist soon. And one more, because it looks s is not going from what ive , this is not going to be a union position. That is unfortunate. We need to figure out a way thas bid process is not a lowest comn denominator bid that ends up has hire someone for low pay that it appropriate and we should try ta prevailing wage for this type o, for this job and maybe more to r benefits. Supervisor fewer thank you y much. You be Public Comment is now cl. Commissioner pollock, do you haa comment . I have a question for miss c. Given we have a short and long f things wed like to correc dire, what does the timeframe look lio issue an rfq as proposed in the . What would be the timing being f we were to have the chair work u and then send it out versus porr details here . Through the air. Angela calvillo, interim office. I believe we could have the find rfq once the Legal Council had n opportunity to review for publit on the streets essentially next. Number one. Then it would be up to the chaie length of time shes interestedn having that rfq out for individo see. We could do kirc different type. There are lots of opportunitiess to determine and work with yorks on where the noticing should go. If its out there for two or ths or shorter or longer, its your. Once we get yes, chair. Supervisor fewer that is a h quicker process than an rfp, ist correct . Thats correct, yes. Once we get the qualified indivs back, its a matter of time of,u know, making just reviewing thoe individuals who have met the mqd your determination of the lengte that is necessary to share withr commissioners. We could make a presentation att Lafco Commission or we could eml the chair to make that decisiond bring that individual here to tt meeting for destruction if shes empowered to make that decision. It will could be as long or shoe manner that i have described itd be. And just so i understand, ife this option, then it would be as person would be an independent contractor, that we would specie length of time. Then if we chose for th the lonm solution to this issue, to issue full rfp, this person could plyr that, but it would be under the independent contract rubric or n that we have in these options. That is correct. Commissioner ronen. I believe there is a twoyear component. Going out for a longer term rfpa good idea. So i think do you have any comment . So if i understand correctlye could direct the chair to work u in terms of figuring out the lae for the rfq, and also to put thq out, and then to work with you a designated hiring staff to hiret person. For the contract not to exceed two years. But i would say maybe that we sd think about until end of fiscalr that we have funding for. Would you need to know from thiy today, the minimum qualificatio . Or could we have the chair worku on that as well . This commission for the chain work with us. And so chair fewer could undd the budget and not to exceed rad be part that have decision thatd ask her to do. Supervisor fewer we could ds today and agree on an amount noo exceed. I would feel comfortable notg today. Because then it gives you the flexibility to work with our Administrative Officer so we dot choose you know, that it woue consistent with the work that we looking at and we wouldnt go or under. It sounds as though there isa decision being made today whetht wed like an rpf versus an rfq. Does the attorney have any infon she wants to add to that . The rfq process would be a qr process. It allows you to implement fastd move forward faster. I see no downside to that. You would need to, as im under, i have not looked at the rfq qualifications, but as i undersm miss calvillo, there would be ar limitation, but that gives you f time to do something more permad you may want to do that anyway. I would say in terms of how quie can get it out, a little bit oft will depend on the schedule of r if you are de delegating. But window could do a legal revd be ready to go if the chair is g to get it out next week. In terms of how long you want it there, you have holidays coming. There is oftentimes a strategy h making deadline before the holid if that fills too quickly, not g the second or third of january e it falls off the radar. If youre going to get through e holidays, i might recommend goie friday before the new years hoo people can have time to finish. That may add an extra week, buty give you a broader selection of candidates. In terms of moving forward, it e the pleasure of the chair how mh authority plebber of the comn to find out how much authority o delegate to the chair whether io screen down and bring forward Te Commission perhaps one or two candidates, even three candidatr whether you want your chair to t selection for to do selectio. If you want to pick the finalisd have a hand in that, we can do t way. I think that i want to be conscious of time, we must adjos meeting by 1 30. So i would like to ask that we a motion, i think what im hearing consensus on is tha wed go forq instead of an rfp because its. I think we would need to make an on that decision. So i think id like to make a mn that we would accept and go witq instead of an rfp for the selecf our executive officer. I would have a friendly ament that that rfq does come empowere chair to work with council and Administrative Officer to scopee the person identified for the r. Thank you. Do we have a second . Okay. I think so this is moved by i have to do we have to approve amendment . Or can we have that as one moti . Clerk the motion hadnt beee yet, so she was adding to it. Supervisor fewer is commissr pollock making that motion or m . Clerk should be one or the. Im happy to make the motione an rfq and empower the chair tok with the Legal Council and exece officer to create a process andn individual for the position. Supervisor fewer thank you. Moved by commissioner ronen secy commissioner pollock without ob. The commission authorizes the cr to this motion passes. Madam clerk, please call item 7. Clerk Public Comment. Supervisor fewer are there y members of the public that woulo speak . Seeing none, Public Comment is. Id like to thank everyone and u all happy mol days. Clerk we have item 8. Item 8 is future agenda items. Supervisor fewer any futures that commissioners would like td calendar to discuss . No. Public comment. Seeing none. Public comment is now ended. That concludes our business. Now happen holidays and a haw year to everyone. We have to adjourn. Okay. [gave good morning. Welcome to the Personnel Committee of the San Francisco transportation board. Im commissioner peskin. Next to commissioner tang, and our clerk is steve stamos. Clerk approve the minutes of the minutes. Public comment is closed. Is there a motion to approve the minutes for the Personnel Committee . Commissioner . Yes. Approve. Okay. Motion to approve the minutes. Well take that with out of objection. And next item please. Clerk item three, closed session item, evaluation of Public Employee performance and recommended approval of the performance agenda for 2018. As far as this is a personnel matter. We are going to go into closed session on this item. Is there any Public Comment on item number three . Miss good morning, everyone and thank you for coming my name is rosy form treasurer of the United States and the form of empowerment 2020. Yeah. Empowerment 2020 is an initiative to durnl encourage a million women we 2020 to go in leaders positions it is request quality day and the one hundred year of the 19 amendment that give woman the right to vote joining me on stage a margo the ceo of ma tell. clapping. 74 percent have been girls in middle school express interest in office only girls are expressing an interest in Computer Science 50 percent less graduating are for girls than thirty years ago ive spent 8 years of the treasurer of the United States to have a portrait on the photo in our Public Engagement process there were one hundred of women overlooked in the history of our country many tops will be discussed and empowerment 2020 conference everything there empowering young women and girls to be the future leader to encourage women to get into Stem Education and getting into nasa and google and making sure that they are part of tech economy. The second part of empowerment 2020 is women money and power to put women in so and so positions for the corporate fleet and elected office the third part of empowerment 2020 are the conferences their action oriented women have flatlined at 20 percent on that percentage one and 20 percent women a in congress that is stagnated if we get up to thirty percent fabulous 80 percent would be amazing that conversation is equality will be something were used to as pair the culture id like to that that will be done like to that that will be done all right, good morning everyone, what an exciting day in San Francisco. Let me begin by introduction myself, i am the San Francisco public works director muhammad. Were here today to break grounds on the Second Street Improvement Project and project that will change the look and feel of this busy corridor in the south of market area. Its not every day that we get to rethink a street, to figure out how it can better serve the people who use it and most importantly, make it safer for everybody. Through smart planning, strong partnerships among multiple city agencies and funding from the federal and local sales tax revenue, and community support, were able to move forward with the Second Street Improvement Project. It will turn in to a stretch that better serves our city for the 21st september century. At the end of the construction of this project we will have upgraded sewers thank to our San Francisco p. U. C. And a smoother road and most importantly a safer and more attractive neighborhood. But before we get started, and well hear from all the several agencies that are involved in this project i want to take a moment to thank the project team who worked on this project together so this point, first i would like that thank project led by our City Engineer john thomas sitting out in the crowd there. [applause] we are a number of project managers, christina oneil, mike rigor and richard from engineer ing and we have steve lee, jackie ying, Michael Smith and jane ko and from our last division who had work to do with the trees and Street Furniture and the designs that will come john dennis and david folig and robin welter and from streets and highway kim chang and from our Communications Rachel Gordon , the very best. Now id like to bring up our mayor ed lee. Mayor lee is someone who knows the importance of improving our neighborhoods and making our streets safe. He has been a big supporter and champion of street scape improvement throughout the city and we are very, very pleased to have him here today to help us kickoff the Second Street project. Please welcome our mayor ed lee. [applause] well thank you, good morning giants fans were here on Second Street thats probably one of my favorite corridors to walk down and get to the giants game and if we were reminded what this street is all about probably a couple of days ago when the water main broke right there at second and harrison it was a good reminder of the fragile infrastructure that we have particularly when pipes that have been touched for over 150 years and so when you saw that water, those are the exactly the water system that muhammad would mention with that the p. C. Will replace for this corridor going north and south. I want to sank supervise or kim foreign inviting us to her district its the eastern soma neighborhood and also a neighborhood that i know that has been working with public works and all our transit or m. T. A. Is here, county, transportational a

© 2025 Vimarsana