it. there will be people out there -a in: for it. there will be people out there paying for then — it. there will be people out there paying for then they _ it. there will be people out there paying for then they should - it. there will be people out there paying for then they should do. l it. there will be people out there| paying for then they should do. is paying for then they should do. t3 that morally reprehensible? i wouldn't class not having, i would class that as a luxury. if you look at every step in the supply chain, sony will pay whatever they are going to pay and they will add it... we arejust an going to pay and they will add it... we are just an extra step in the supply chain. t5 we are just an extra step in the suaply chain-— supply chain. is that a justification _ supply chain. is that a justification for - supply chain. is that a justification for it? - supply chain. is that a - justification for it? because you see it elsewhere it is all right? tt you see a friction between supply and demand, you are going to see someone capitalise on it. hot someone capitalise on it. not everyone _ someone capitalise on it. not everyone knows _ someone capitalise on it. not everyone knows that these bots exist so to those people, do they deserve to have their ability to shop for these items taken away from them because there is someone else out there that is using tech? it is because there is someone else out there that is using tech?— there that is using tech? it is not that hard to _ there that is using tech? it is not that hard to get _ there that is using tech? it is not that hard to get a _ there that is using tech? it is not that hard to get a console. -