Donald trump on becoming president , and expressing the hope that both countries would take their relationship to a whole new level. Now, moscows relations with the us and the west are so bad that the russian Prime MinisterDmitri Medvedev talks of them as ruined. That was after americas response to the recent Chemical Attack in syria. But even before that, there was the stand off in ukraine, and accusations of russian interference in american elections. Now there are fears the russians could meddle in the French Elections and other european votes this year. My guest is vladimir chizhov, russias ambassador to the eu. Will russia promise not to pervert democracy in europe . Vladimir chizhov, welcome to hardtalk. Thank you. Frances Foreign Ministerjean marc ayrault has accused russia of meddling in french democratic life. Is that true . Of course its not. Well, im afraid that this wave of anti russian rhetoric has become contagious, and has spread across the atlantic ocean. Thats very bad for our relations with our countries involved, but i think its bad for those countries themselves, including their democratic procedures and processes. But the accusation is being levelled against russia for a reason. And if we look at some of the things that are being said Richard Ferrand, who is Secretary General of emmanuel macrons en marche, onwards party, said that their campaign was being hit by hundreds, if not thousands, of attacks probing their Computer Systems, and that was coming from locations inside russia. Well, in the modern world, you can never be sure where hacking attacks are coming from. There is no technical possibility of tracing anything. So, this is not a piece of hard evidence, by any means. But you can follow, you can, via the technology, follow where attacks are coming from. Emmanuel macrons campaign say these attacks are coming from russia. Well, thats an allegation that i wouldnt accept without any hard evidence. 0k, what about the accusation of fake news that is being spread by russia . Again, Richard Ferrand says two of the big Media Outlets belonging to the russian state russia today and sputnik spread fake news on a daily basis, they are picked up, quoted and they influence democracy. Well, i believe that those news outlets have been so successful, to the chagrin of their competitors among the western media. And that has been the case, because they have been providing alternative angles of the same events, and giving the floor to people, including many westerners, who were willing to put forward their own views which would, in some cases, contradict the so called mainstream. But its, in some cases. Its things that are wrong, they are saying things that are factually incorrect. Take a headline, they had to be picked up on it by frances Polling Commission, suggesting Francois Fillon, somebody who has in the past spoken very positively about Russia Sputnik said he was at the head of the polls, and the Polling Commission said thats not true, that actually a poll is defined by law in france. They were improperly calling it a poll when it wasnt, and they shouldnt be saying things like that. Well, its an expression of free press. Isnt that one of the main European Values . And if you compare the amount of fake news that are addressed to russia from the west, thats incomparably more. And i would say to that, that anybody has a right to have ones own view on what the outcome of a future election would be. But this is something different, isnt it . You seem to be saying, and lets be clear these are organisations that are owned by the russian state its fine if they say things that are wrong. Is that your situation . Well, im not saying. First of all, what makes you so sure that they are wrong . Secondly, they have a right to say that. If you want to challenge that. Francois fillon this is a matter of fact Francois Fillon was not at the head of the polls, he was way behind. So why, if they Say Something thats wrong and they are picked up on it by the Polling Commission. If they were wrong on that one, well, perhaps they might wish to apologise, or present some facts that would support the point of view. But the russian government has nothing to do with that. The difficulty is that both these two organisations, who are who have the information they are releasing appears to be things that either support the conservative candidate, or the far right candidate, the Front National of Marine Le Pen, and damage emmanuel macron. For example, it was down to sputnik that there were stories that came out suggesting that he had a gay relationship outside his marriage. He actually had to come out and say thats not true. Well, what would you say if, in the view of the upcoming british election, those two outlets support theresa may and the conservatives . On the candidates in the French Election, who is it that you want . Would you like Marine Le Pen to win the French Election . We would like france to come out of this election without undue politicisation of the french society. Which means what . Would you like Marine Le Pen to win . Well, i am not a french voter, so i wouldnt want to speculate who is best. Sure, but we know that Marine Le Pen, the Front National, has been given a 9 Million Euro loan by a Russian PrivateBank Something that presumably is only possible when its authorised by the kremlin. Is that because Russia SupportsMarine Le Pen . That story is fake. It was not a russian bank, it was a czech bank, actually, with some russian participation. And since the 9 million loan was given to the Front National, the Bank Actually went bankrupt. And those people who have undertaken their affairs, they are now demanding the money back. And so, those who said, for example, mikhail kasyanov, who was Prime Minister under president Vladimir Putin before he joined the opposition, said for me, there is no doubt the loan was authorised by the kremlin. Is he wrong . I am sure he is wrong. And, you know, he was Prime Minister very long ago. Ok, well, lets move on to germany then because you say all these things are inconsequential, what about the fact that the german chancellor Angela Merkel refers to russia sowing false information in germany, and her warning that it could play a role in the coming Election Campaign . Well, i respect her views as a german politician and as a candidate in the upcoming bundestag election, and of course, as chancellor of the federal republic. But, whether there is hard evidence, i dont know if there is. Maybe she would like to present it. The head of the german domestic security service, hans georg maassen, says we see aggressive and increased cyber spying and Cyber Operations that could potentially endanger German Government officials, mps, employees of democratic parties. And he says, and he said after the bundestag Computer System was shut down, that in addition to spying lately russian Intelligence Agencies have shown a willingness to conduct sabotage. Is he wrong . Well, i think, as i said in the beginning, this anti russian hysteria is really becoming contagious. Look at what was happening a few months ago in the United States. It has now evidently spread on to france and onwards to germany. I wonder if the United Kingdom will come clean in this situation in view of the upcoming election . I hope it does. But as far as that is concerned, youre right that even the current us secretary of state rex tillerson, who was, of course, appointed by President Trump, who, the accusations go, benefited from russian involvement in the american elections, even he says its pretty evident that russia is taking similar tactics into the electoral processes throughout europe, and so, they are really undermining any hope for improved relations with many European Countries. Well, i think you should perceive these words as indication that there was no russian involvement in the us election. So you would say categorically, this isjust russia. Clearly this was a man, part of President Trumps team, who didnt believe there was but has now become convinced. He says its becoming that russians are getting involved in European Countries elections, they are all saying russia is, and youre saying they are all hysterical . Chuckles. Well, i would say that. It all starts with people who lose elections, then it spreads all across the political spectrum. And i would say that it is a sign of degradation of the intellectual and ethical level of electoral campaigns in the west, in general. I am not blaming any particular country. But it seems to be a contagious disease. Except in this case, its the winning team in the United States. And its also notjust politicians its the american Intelligence Agencies, who said we assess with high confidence that President Putin ordered an influence campaign in the president ial elections. The consistent goal was to undermine public faith. Well, i leave it to the Current Us Administration to judge the degree of confidence in the information they get from the intelligence community. They are known in recent history to have misled previous administrations. Ok, so youre saying they are wrong on this. The effect of all this has left us in a situation where your Prime Minister, Dmitri Medvedev, talks of completely ruined relations between the United States and the west, and russia. And he said that after there was the american response to the Chemical Attack in syria. But he talks about moscow and washington. You talked then of moscow and washington being on the verge of a military clash. Is that still the case, do you think . Well, of course russian American Relations are at a low level today, definitely. And the lower the level is for two nuclear powers, the greater is the risk of a military clash. Well, i hope it wont come to that, of course. And i think secretary tillersons Visit To Moscow has proved to be a small step in promoting the Mutual Understanding that is so necessary, particularly in a situation like this. President trump has said were not getting along with russia at all, we may be at an all time low. Is he right . Well, an all time low might be right or wrong, but weve known other periods when relations were quite low. But, in recent history, yes, i think hes right. If we compare this within the period of the last 10 15 years, yes, we are at a very low point. Your views on President Trump, because of course russia was very hopeful that there might be a new relationship with this new american president. And then we have a situation where, after recent events, notjust whats happened in syria, but also the warnings in north korea, where the anchor of your main Weekly Television news show, who is a very pro kremlin, dmitry kiselyov, says the world is a hairs breadth from nuclear war. He talks about the confrontation between donald trump and kim jong un both are dangerous, but who is more dangerous . Trump is, trump is more impulsive and unpredictable. Do you think hes right . I can refer to you the commentary made by the spokesman for President Putin, mr peskov. He said that that view of mr kiselyov was his own, and was not the official position of the russian government. So what is the official position of the russian government now on President Trump . Well, thats an interesting question, in view of some, i would say, evolutions of the us president s approach to various international issues. I think the position of the new administration will settle in a matter of weeks or months, because i think its too early to say. Its too early to say . On that, what appears to have damaged, what Dmitri Medvedev talks of ruining the relationships, was when there was the United States air strike on an airbase in syria in response to a Chemical Attack. Now, russia had it within its powers to activate air Defence Systems, and prevent some of that attack on the syrian airbase. Why did it not do so . Well, first of all, i would ask you not to cut corners in describing the sequence of events that happened. If you referred to a Chemical Attack, then you would perhaps wish to at least say an alleged Chemical Attack. Because there is no confirmation of that attack having happened. Of course, there could have been a direct counter hit, but that might have led to much more serious consequences in russia us relations. Im not talking about a retaliatory strike, im talking about something that neutralised. You canjust say look, we didnt have the Military Capability. Is that what youre saying . No. So there was the Military Capability to neutralise . Im not a military expert, but i will tell you what i think of it. 0k. I think that particular situation required consideration of all the different aspects. So it was a political decision not to do that and use the air Defence Systems . Perhaps, but my guess would be as good as yours. 0k. You picked me up on my question, because you said there isnt even evidence that there was a Chemical Attack. Are you really going to hold to that position . Well, until proven otherwise. Did you see the images . The staged images. You know, let me tell you, i am not a chemical expert either. But youre a human being, and i imagine you saw those images coming out of syria. Of course. Yes. You know, sarin is a very toxic substance, so if you have an agonising child, you cannot hold it close to your chest without dying in a few minutes afterwards. The infamous white helmets, that are known to have staged artificial scenes on video, they were there without any protective garments, without even gas masks. So the whole thing was fabricated, do you seriously suggest that . I suggest that, but im not saying that that was the case, because there was no. You know, two weeks have passed, but still there has been no investigation. The British Foreign secretary Boris Johnson and the French Foreign ministerjean marc ayrault described that story as a shameless production of lies. They say that british scientists and others have analysed samples which have tested positive forsarin, ora sarin like substance. You are not implying that british scientists were there on the ground collecting the samples. Nobody, eitherfrom britain, the United States, or france, went there and had any inspection on the ground. Why. Let me finish. That is why my country has been consistently demanding that international investigators, experienced specialists from the organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons, should go down there. So why did you veto the Un Resolution calling for an investigation . Because the resolution, the draft resolution blamed the Syrian Government for that. If it had been only a call for investigation, we would have supported that, wholeheartedly. Do you think russia. Actually, we tabled an alternative draft, which unfortunately was not supported. Not supported . You were isolated. Is there a danger that russia has become almost dangerously isolated as a result of this issue . I do not accept the claim that russia was isolated, even in this particular case. As you know, the Western Draft Resolution was not supported by five of the 15 members of the security council. Abstained rather than vetoed. Well, there is only the need for one permanent member to veto a resolution. And on the question of what happened with. Whether there was a Chemical Attack, you call for an investigation by the opcw. They are going to carry out an investigation. Will you accept whatever theirfinding is . Of course. I wonder why they are not there yet, because two weeks have passed. The Syrian Government has invited them to inspect the airfield which was the object of the us air attack, and certain prominent figures of the opposition that controlled the area where the alleged Chemical Attack happened, they said that they would ensure safety of the inspectors. So i dont see any real obstacle preventing those inspectors from going. The former director of the cia, john brennan, who was in post until this year, said this month the Russians Feign Sincerity better than anyone i know. They would promise they would work with us, try to restrain the Syrian Government and military from carrying out these atrocious attacks, and they wouldnt, so i lost faith in their willingness and interest to do the right thing. Is that russias problem here, that you are losing the trust of people around the world . I dont have that impression. Actually, this in my view isnt the case at all. You dont fear that that might happen . I dont think so, because Russian Foreign policy has been clear and transparent, and of course, our goals are quite obvious, be it in syria or elsewhere. Vladimir chizhov, thank you for coming on hardtalk. Hello. If you think were finished with winter weather, think again. Next week it will turn much colderfor a time. Frost and even some wintry showers around for some of us. Well talk about that weather change in a moment. But this is the fairly quiet picture as friday begins. I say fairly quiet because we have got Rain Affecting Parts of scotland with a stronger wind. Itll be a mild start for much of the uk and where wed like some rain across those parts of england, wales, into the Channel Islands that have been so very dry, it is looking mainly dry as the day begins. Variable cloud, a few bright or sunny breaks. Now, from the thickest cloud in wales, more especially north west england, Northern Ireland and south west scotland, a bit damp and drizzly in places, especially coasts and hills. Some more persistent rain with the stronger wind across the northern half of scotland. Thats cleared away from the Northern Isles at this stage, so were left in a colder, Showery Air Mass throughout the day. Quite windy, some of those showers might have a wintry flavour. Through the day we take outbreaks of Rain Southwards across scotland, eventually reaching into parts of Northern Ireland. Well keep plenty of cloud, north west england and wales, into the west midlands, maybe the odd spot of light rain or drizzle. Well keep some sunny spells, though, east of the pennines, east midlands, east anglia, Southern England often cloudy but some bright or sunny spells and some warmth in that sunshine when it makes an appearance. Some of us 18 or even 19 celsius. Now, on through friday evening, a lot of dry weather to come going into saturday morning. Just this zone of thicker cloud, patchy light rain or drizzle edging southwards. To the north of that, colder, colder start to saturday, parts of northern england, especially scotland with a touch of frost. On through the weekend, no significant change any time soon. Thats confined to next week. For the weekend it will be mainly dry. There will be a lot of cloud around at times but some bright or sunny spells. Close to this weather front, still a bit of damp and drizzly Weather Edging its way southwards during saturday. North of that, sunny spells, a few showers running into northern scotland. South of that, were Keeping Temperatures up here, so a bit of warmth if the sun makes an appearance. But it will be a cooler feel across many parts of the uk, and particularly where youve got the breeze. But as ever, if the sun makes an appearance it will feel quite pleasant. Similarly so on sunday. A lot of dry weather for england and wales, for Northern Ireland until late in the day. But parts of scotland, especially the further north you are, Turning Windier and wetter as the day goes on. Looking fairly promising for the london marathon, there will be some warmth as the day goes on but for the start, single figure temperatures, and if its overcast, thats pretty much ideal i think for the runners. Now, going from sunday to monday, particularly by the time we get to tuesday, that weather change i was talking about, colder air pushing south across the uk and a stronger wind and some of those showers will be turning wintry. Hello, youre watching bbc world news. Im chris rogers. Our top story this hour frances president , francois hollande, promises absolute vigilance after the deadly gun attack in paris. The shooting on the Champs Elysees claimed the life of one policeman. Two more were seriously wounded. The suspect, shot dead by police, was a French National known to the security services. Im Karin Giannone in paris, a city in shockjust days before the first round of frances president ial election. Were live in the capital to assess the Security Situation and what the attack might mean for sundays vote. Hello