timeline? >> right, i'm okay with the chairman's judgment on that. i think what you're going to see is that the yardstick is going to be are we getting the core facts to the american public. if you can the that with the witnesses you got, then you do that. i think that there is diminishing curve there of return when you start engaging in litigation to chase down maybe minor details or additional information when you've got the core facts. remember, this may be a case where the most important evidence came out first, where the call memorandum, the whistle-blower complaint, which as far as i can tell has been confirmed in every respect by independent evidence and the white house admissions, the chief of staff, the president, the text messages, i mean, there is a mountain of evidence that paints a clear picture of presidential abuse of authority. so i don't know that it would be worth the time to spend months and months chasing down all the details. >> do you see this as being one charge? obviously you're not there yet. but do you see this as being one charge or there is people talking about going -- including obstruction of justice from the mueller report. >> for me personally, and it's above my pay grade, but for me