first is talk about the constitutionality or what constitutes an impeachability offense and have dollar zlars in to talk about. but the spt welcome to go invited himself if he wants to. but it's more likely he sends his legal testimony there. what do you expect them to say. >> i think what they'll say is that all of these facts, whatever they are, in the legal history here don't constitute an impeach. able offense. but clear i there was bribery, which is specifically mentioned in the constitution as an impeachable offense. the president offered to perform a legal responsibility, namely releasing that military aid, in exchange for sog of value and benefit to him. >> except the republicans say there was no explicit promise of the release of military aid and in exchange. there is no recording of the president saying out loud even though witness after witness say it's their understanding that was the case. >> well as a prosecutor, i used