object, because their definition is the one they want to control the jury. >> sara, do you think that the state in the closing arguments delivered what they needed to do to make this final argument? but what do you think of the rebuttal from the prosecution we watched this morning? >> i think it was very effective, kate. i think it was directly responsive to the defense closing arguments. the idea that, you know, there was a boogeyman in the neighborhood, you know, that ahmaud arbery was dangerous, that he committed a crime. she methodically showed that these men had no knowledge of him having committed a crime. there was no citizens arrest. she went further to reel back in roddy bryan, because i think his attorney did a fantastic job of distancing him from these other two men, showing that he didn't even know there was a gun there until the first shot was fired.