something? >> i don't delve into the coverage toss whog getting better or less. does that give them an advantage? maybe. my view is -- >> i don't mean to interrupt, but to add, the op buds person for "the washington post" and "new york times" both admitted in the coverage of the '08 election, they were biased. both papers admitted it. >> well, i'm not much on ombudsman, i don't like newspapers or editorial writers, but the problem that the party has, and our fight now is to which path are we going to stake? are we going to adapt the path that says we're not conservative enough, as is going on in virginia, or do we need to reach out to a broader audience? do we need to attract women, his spanning, african-americans?