of chick kren. she wants to know what the process is going to look like. i don't understand the speculation that there is for some period of time going to be the idea that you hold back the articles of impeachment because for a couple reasons one is the democrats have been saying i think correctly for a long time we're in a rush, we got to do this quickly, we can't wait, this person is a recidivist, the president can't be allowed to do this again and now you're going to say hurry up, hurry up, now wait. that doesn't make a lot of sense either. i don't understand what leverage the democrats have having now successfully got articles of impeachment passed. i understand the need and they should want badly to have other witnesses who have been, you are know, absent to come and testify, but what is the leverage on mitch mcconnell to rush? i understand what michael was saying if you know you have to have the trial, have it super quick even before christmas, but if there's a possibility that the democrats say unless these witnesses come forward, we're not going to send you the articles and the prospect hangs in the air not to have a trial,