attorney general garland? >> well, i do think meadows is very likely to be charged with criminal contempt, just like bannon. erin, simply because bannon's claims are bizarre and ludicrous. it doesn't make meadows' claims good. the executive privilege belongs to the president of the united states -- the current president -- as the court decided when trump's tried to stop the committee. the president is not asserting as to meadows. as you point out, there are many other deficiencies in the arguments in the meadows' case that was filed today, including that privilege doesn't protect this kind of misconduct. these are political actions. they're not within the official purview of the executive. and so, not within executive privilege. he's not going to succeed here. as you noted, this is about delay. it's about defiance. and it's about the desire to now