benefit of the defendant. we are in a jurisdiction where the jurors have the ability to ask questions they have. all this unexplainable stuff ultimately may be good for the defendant. we don't know why she still had her bra on, why she was facing this way or that way. if the defense can hammer that home, that this is just -- if it's unexplainable, there's no reasonable doubt. that is probably the direction they're going to go, that and the fact that the science so far is in the defendant's favor. >> sunny, danny, we have to watch this one carefully. thank you for joining us on this first day we look at it. why? because it is so usual that we see this conflict between what seems obvious in a public way versus the perception of what you get to show and prove at trial. that's what makes this case so compelling what do you think? use the hash tag new day and talk about this to us online. we'll keep the story going and follow the developments sas t sy