the implication is that this was done intentionally. that's not a typical routing that awe would take. do you think that's the most likely scenario, that it had to be intentional if this was the path? >> well, again, if this was the path, yeah, i don't see any reason why it would have gone that way. there's no reason it would have stayed on the path, if it was a mechanical failure, let's say, that it would have continued on the flight path. but the idea that it took an intentional turn up north and then to the south, i have no idea what that would be other than something at human hand. >> of course, even if this is the flight path, the way it took, we still don't know why. but the implication was that this was to avoid military radar, to avoid going over the land mass and to avoid detection. is there a scenario that you can think of in your mind, that this would be done, and it was not with a bad intention? >> now, you're really stretching