a bad deal. >> but it's not america, rabbi and that's the point to you, jeremy america, what is that word imply, it must imply a unified position. and it isn't. and we assume the prime minister knew that there were stories that maybe the prime minister was told you know both sides of congress wanted this. and he was a little hoodwinked. assuming he now know what is he's getting into he's still going forward. is this a dangerous move? >> the question is whether or not for those of us who care deeply about israel's security does undermining the bipartisan basis of support for israel in this country, damage israel's security in the long run? and the risk is that this issue is becoming a partisan football just like every other issue on the american political scene. if you have a speech that is supported by the speaker of the house, in an effort to embarrass the sitting president of the united states not telling him, going behind his back instead of coordinating it with the white house, and it's done also to advance the prime minister's own