loop. it was certainly that trial of the century, perhaps replacing the lindbergh trial of 1935 which had the designation up until simpson. >> something like dog magazines were covering o.j. simpson back in the day. i want to ask you because i used to work at "in session" and people seemed to ask why can't there be cameras in every courtroom? are there cons to having trials covered and televised? >> yeah, i think it's an interesting fallacy that exists with cameras in the courtroom. i think it does change not only the dynamic of the courtroom itself, i think a trial participants do behave differently in being in a televised trial. the simpson case was a case in