protocols violated by the officer, it was dismissed as not relevant. they may have dismissed it in a criminal context. certainly in a civil context, it is going to be very relevant. in terms of the views were, we see people looking at i. i don't have to be descriptive. they're suggesting the, the solicitor, he was about to be run over and he was going to be sliding underneath that car him when this is brought to bear, i think you deal with a different standard with a civil jury, did this officer act in a reasonable way by a preponderance of the everyday and did he use force, was it fess by a preponderance of the evidence. i think it's a far different standards, they can be successful if it goes that far. >> we know a department of justice investigation is continuing. is it possible that officer actualer could face federal charges? >> you know, it's always possible, allison. i don't see it for the following