look at this and they think, how does this happen? how do you answer that? >> yeah, christi, good morning to you. good morning, elie. it happens because you had a situation here where the judge acknowledged that, in his view, there was intentional discrimination, but failed to faction a remedy. in the event you have a court indicating this is the appearance that something is amiss, i think then you are incumbent as a court to do something about it, right? clearly you acknowledge there's a problem. so, that's how it happens. it happens prior to that because both sides have what are called challenges. you can strike a juror for any reason or no reason at all, provided that reason is not on discriminatory. so, here we had a judge saying, absorbing and saying, you know what, yep, the composition may be off, you may have used your challenges in a way that's intentional or discriminatory, but nothing to see here, let's go forward. i think that's a mistake, undermines confidence in the system.