> ridiculous and classless. i think the "new york times" has a real problem someti"> > ridiculous and classless. i think the "new york times" has a real problem someti" property="og:description"> > ridiculous and classless. i think the "new york times" has a real problem someti">
times" demanding they retract some of the comments. tell me about that. >> ridiculous and classless. i think the "new york times" has a real problem sometimes, other people get scoops and recognizing the contributions of other journalists. if they bothered to read the report she would see what she put out there was factually inaccurate. i feel strongly they should have a retraction, clearly the "new york times" management can't step up to the plate and admit they made a mistake. >> shocking behavior by the "new york times." you were right, they were wrong. turning to the general news agenda since michael's death, he loved all this, wouldn't he? the nsa, edward snowden, the chatter, right up his wheelhouse? >> no, i mean, absolutely. there isn't a more contiguous time for national security reporters than right now.