most importantly, the state department and many other people disagree with the judgment on classification these are four e-mails, and the disagreement about whether they were classified. it was never mentioned that the state department is on record saying no these were not classified disagreeing with my friend. and finally, the notion of the criminal referral that went all over the internet yesterday, now retrieving by the new york times saying well a justice department official told us that, without naming the justice department official who got it wrong when we referred to a criminal referral about hillary clinton. how can the new york times get that expression. >>s joe, wait wait, i want to ask a follow-up, lanny, the times says this was an unforeseen consequence of her unusual computer setup. wasn't it an entirely foreseeable consequence of the way in which she decided to