could get away with fine-tuning the law. do you understand the point that i'm making? >> i do. >> and if so, give a 20-second reaction. >> i think it's smart. i think it's wise and i think it's also principled. because in the abstract, the princele is just the courts and politicians or democrats should be making the decision about the result of an election and that are principle is impossible to deny. so when members of congress are put to a vote about whether they endorse that principle in the abstract, i think it's impossible for them to vote the other way. >> matthew seligman thank you so much for the expertise. >> thanks for having me. remember, i want know what you think, go to my website at smerconish.com. answer the survey question, will mike pence testify before the january 6th committee? won't that be interesting. yes or no. up ahead, is it smart when business ceos refuse to hold from lawmakers who certified the