they've already approved her three times for various positions including the sentencing commission. so this is her fourth time before these lawmakers. they've asked the same questions in the past and you're hearing some of those lines come back again. could you describe it as soft on. soft on, fill in the blank. and that is what you'll be hearing most tomorrow. >> it is her fourth time but it still carries a lot of weight given the historic name of this confirmation. >> as you saw, the confirmation was not about judge jackson. it was about the supreme court confirmation process. i mean, judge kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, the issues that came up in that, are not terribly relevant to what happened with judge jackson except in this day and age, all the polarization we see in congress is filtered through lens of a confirmation hearing like this. but look. it is totally fair to look at her opinions and to ask her questions just like any other