correspondent is reading this, off and he reads his own name. >> 17th, daniel schorr. the note here is "a real media enemy." >> i remember thinking at the time, what is going on? is this really believable? >> you're aware, mr. dean, of the gravity of the charges you've made under oath against the highest official of our land, the president of the united states? >> yes, i am. >> and being so aware, do you still stand on your statement? >> yes, i do. when i'm finishing my testimony for the senate, i read it, and i said, you know, it's my word against haldeman, ehrlichson, mitchell and the president. >> all of us watching this is surmising that there is another witness someplace in the building. >> a witness will be called, and as to who it will be we'll have to wait and see. >> are you aware of any installation of any listening devices in the oval office of the president? >> i was aware of listening devices, yes, sir. >> when he answered yes, everybody in america just froze. like uh-oh, tapes? what tapes? >> as far as you know, did mr. ehrlichman or mr. dino about the presence of those devices? >> that would be unlikely. my assumption is that they didn't know. >> the story of watergate takes on a whole different complexion. and the happiest man in the moment would be john dean. >> what is the best way to reconstruct those conversations mr. butterfield? >> well, in the obvious manner, mr. dash. to obtain the tape and play it. >> slowly, this smile comes over my face, and i said, get those tapes as fast as you can before they disappear. >> this afternoon i received from the white house a letter declining to furnish the eight requested tapes. careful study before requesting the tapes convinced me that any blanket claim of privilege to