refresh your website in time for the party switch. really interesting. i mean, untested and interesting, but if she you're right, she had been vocal about abortion rights. and so if she wasn't as vocal today, that's curious. yes but she's still undermining the democratic party. right this this narrative that we're hearing that democrats are just so intolerant and that we can't even you know , we're such snowflakes. we can't handle emojis like that's just not reality, right? we know that this was more than about the emoji, but she is feeding into that frenzy, which i think again undermines the party's efforts undermines what they stand for their was one democrat state. rep cecil brockman, who was quoted in the charlotte observer. who said, you know, he said, i understand why she did what she did because the party hasn't been treating her fairly. i mean, it seems like there's been some personal animus has been left out of certain meetings and what one quote struck me, he said. democrats would rather be right than when elections and we've seen politicians switch all the time. jim jeffords in the early two thousand's not all the time. no, it's happened historically, one jeffords inspectors, jim justice