you know, he's going to be called as a witness at some point. >> i want to read you something here that's just in. from peter baker's piece that posted in "the new york times" tonight. here's what it says. this is a selection from it. moreover, other officials amplified the narrative thursday with details that were not in the complaint. at one point they said an order was given to not distribute the reconstructed transcript of mr. trump's call as would be typical. instead copies were printed out and hand delivered to a select group. what do you read from that? >> i'm a little concerned about whether the trump white house might be holding back on certain details associated with that conversation. one very interesting part of the complaint is the first paragraph of the appendix where the whistle-blower alleges that the initial transcript of the call was actually loaded onto a