national security adviser. he wanted nothing to do with the drug deal that trump advisers were cooking up in ukraine. and his lawyer teased to house investigators he had important information and knowledge about it. why isn't he talking? >> he has said that he's caught between two coequal branchs of government. conflicts directives. one from the executive branch asserts privilege. don't testify we're preventing you. one saying we want to hear what you have to say. he wants it to go before a judge. i would like to think it's a good faith effort to get a neutral ruling. because maybe you are in a quandary. and you don't know which branch of government to follow. i would argue that the argument that the administration is making doesn't really seem to hold water. based on discussions with lawyers. if this can be resolved speedily and the judge says go ahead and