Reporter throwing objects. Looks like the gas tank just popped. Reporter and setting cars on fire. At least one person was shot and rushed to the hospital. A Police Officer also hospitalized after a rock smashed the windshield of a squad car. The weekend of violence began on saturday with demonstrators torching several businesses, overturning cars, and throwing rocks at police to protest the Police Shooting death of 23yearold silvel smith. Police say he turned toward the officer with a gun in his hand. The officers body camera capturing the deadly encounter. Milwaukees mayor tried to address the festering anger about whether the shooting was justified. Without question, he had a gun in his hand. And i want our community to know that. Reporter Governor Scott walker activating the National Guard to assist police and declaring a state of emergency. I was worried about whether or not things would escalate. Reporter smiths family and friends holding a vigil marked
by prayers. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. Reporter with his sister calling for peace. Dont bring the violence here and the ignorance here. Reporter local Police Confirmed they made several arrests overnight. Thats in addition to the 17 people arrested saturday night. As the department of justice here in wisconsin continues to investigate the deadly shooting from over the weekend, theres still a lot of uncertainty about where this Community Goes from here, alisyn. Okay, ana. Thanks so much for that. Were following more breaking news for you at this hour. Police have arrested a suspect linked to the shooting death of an officer outside of atlanta. The suspect is accused of killing Police Officer tim smith as he exited his car to confront the 24yearold suspect. The officer a father of three, was rushed to the hospital, but he died of his injuries. Were going to cover both of those stories more this morning, but lets turn to politics. Republican president ial nominee
donald trump not keeping his plan to stop isis a secret anymore. Hes going to give a speech about it today. Perhaps it will give him a break from his new target, the media. Trump is intent on tweeting and talking about how he is a victim of the press. Cnns Jessica Schneider joins us now with more. Good morning. Good morning, chris. Donald trump trying to get back on message after a weekend of media bashing. Hell turn to the fight against isis in a speech at Youngstown State University in ohio this afternoon. Hell outline a threepillar approach to combat isis, painting the fight as an ideological struggle on par with the cold war. Hes going to lay out his vision and his strategy for defeating radical islamic terrorism. Reporter donald trump turning his isissent cricentrin policy ideals into a threepillar proposal to defeat them. Hes going to talk about how you target your enemies and work
with your friends. You dont overreach and destabilize countries like the Obama Clinton administration has done. Reporter a Senior Campaign official says trump will unveil several proposals today. Hell declare an end to nation building and consider any country willing to help defeat isis an ally. A call that could include russia, a country he originally wanted to back in the fight. Russia wants to get rid of isis. We want to get rid of isis. Maybe let russia do it. Reporter trump will propose suspending visas from any country with heavy terrorist activity and raise the bar for entry into the u. S. The officials suggests trumps camp will formulate an ideological test for entry, including stances on issues like religious freedom but no specific mention was made of the muslim ban he called for just nine months ago. Donald j. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of muslims entering theUnited States. Reporter and trump promises to make a clear statement to the world that the u. S. Is fighting a battle not just militarily and financially but ideologically, a point far from trumps bombastic rhetoric of the past. I would bomb the [ bleep ] out of them. We have to knock the hell out of them. You have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. Reporter the speech comes after trump repeatedly used a false claim on the campaign trail. I call president obama and Hillary Clinton the founders of the isis. Reporter and paraded his selfproclaimed expertise on the terrorist group. I know more about isis than the generals do. Believe me. And trumps policy speech today comes amid sagging poll numbers in key swing states and days of distractions. Everything from those controversial comments calling president obama and Hillary Clinton the founders of isis to his rails against the media at a connecticut rally saturday. Of course, looking today to get back to that policy. Chris and alisyn . Jessica, thank you very much for all of that. Joining us now to discuss it, cnn political analyst and Washington Bureau chief of the daily beast, Jackie Kucinich. And anchor of Time Warner Cable news, errol louis. Lets look the a the three tenants of Donald Trumps plan. Hes going to build alliances based on willingness to fight terror, not on anything else. In other words, ally ourselves with russia or whomever if theyre willing to go after isis. Number two, suspend visas to countries the u. S. Cannot appropriately vet. Thats sort of like a morphing of the muslim ban that hes been moving towards. And three, define efforts as ideological struggle against radical islam. Ee errol, what do you hear . I hear a mishmash. When you try to turn those into proposals, youll run into all kinds of problems. We have alliances. Those alliances have the force of law. Those were approved by congress. You dont just sort of tear them all up and say, well, never mind, lets just pick and choose. So there will be some problems with that. There will be a lot of blowback, i think, from the professionals in the diplomatic and National Security establishment. Hes an antiestablishment candidate. He wants that fight. Hes going to get that fight. I think when it comes to ideology, what ideology are we talking about it and how do you vet for ideology . These are questions that were raised the very first time he said he wanted to have a complete and total shutdown of muslims coming into the United States. Then he adapted it and said, well, only ones that profess jihad. Theres no stage along the way. Its already a cumbersome enough process. Theres no point at which youre supposed to go with a checklist and talk about your ideology or religion. He would say why not. Maybe we need that. Thats also a part of it, that there might be a question asked. What if they lie . But its politically much more palatable to a broader
audience than what hed been saying about banning muslims. Heres the other thing with the idea that hes going to stop immigration from places where theyve had islamic terror. Does that mean the uk . Does that mean france . Does that mean european allies . Thats not something thats going to go over well. Lets hear if he says it today. I think one part that shows a growth, obviously he got a lot of heat for saying he knows more about isis than the generals, even in the world of hyperbole it was obviously afield too far. But it is an ideological war. Thats an interesting point for donald trump to make. The idea of bombing the blank out of isis is satisfying, but youre fighting an idea. Youre fighting an idea that manifests itself in different countries, different populations based on really need of that desperation. Thats different for him. Its a subtlety of what were doing here that is new out of his mouth. Theres a real possibility that he could surprise us, right. You cannot bomb the crap out of,
you know, somebody well, some kid sitting in his parents basement looking at old videos that are online. If thats where its coming from and we know, in fact, there are people who are, quote, selfradicalizing within the United States, who are, in fact, citizens. This doesnt deal with that at all. It doesnt deal with anything happens internally. Its all assuming the threat is coming in externally. But it may be a nod to the threat from this most recent spate of ridiculous statements. The wall street journal put out a really heavy handed editorial. Lets put up part of the language. It was really the conclusion they came to that i think is going to have the most bite. If the Trump Campaign cant change its act by labor day, the gop has no choice but to write off the nominee as hopeless and focus on salvaging the senate. He needs to learn how to behave, stop blaming everyone else,
decide if he wants to behave like someone who wants to be president , and turn the nomination over to mike pence. What do you think . Seems like a fever dream. Pence has been playing a really interesting inside game. Hes going to release his tax returns. Hes really honing toward a traditional political message. And differing from and differing from the top of the ticket, exactly. So its been interesting to watch the two sort of drill their own paths. The frustration of the wall street Journal Editorial Board is shared by many. But i think labor day is a little too early. The first debate in late september is going to be a clear defining moment where either this candidacy is back on track or those who have a problem with it are going to really start shouting, not just complaining and grumbling. Jackie, lets talk about this new reporting from the New York Times with Paul Manafort and his dealings in the ukraine with
victor yanukovych. He was a consultant. Apparently the New York Times and investigators have found these handwritten ledgers that are offthebook payments that they claim amounted to Something Like 12. 7 million for Paul Manafort from his dealings there with yanukovych. Well, hes responded. He says, once again the New York Times has chosen to purposefully ignore facts and professional journalism. I have never received a single off the books cash payment as falsely reported by the New York Times, nor have i ever worked for the governments of ukraine or russia. Its hard to think manafort is terribly worried about his reputation. Im surprised hes so concerned about that. That said, this muddies the
water. Theyve made a lot of accusations against the clintons and the Clinton Foundation. At its core, this goes to that argument. Look at your campaign chair. Look who hes dealt with. Look what hes done. I think it really does undermine that attack by the Trump Campaign. Errol . Also, i want to parse that statement from Paul Manafort. If i understand the article correctly, i dont think it was the governments that were funneling him the money. Ping the accusation was that the parties that supported those who were in charge of those governments were funneling the money. We also know and this i think is probably provable, that he was involved in some cash flow, some cash transactions to try and set up businesses yausing some of t assets of the same region. Hes got a lot of explaining to do. Why do voters care about this . You could be right in that they dont. Hes not running for office. The concern is that trump decided to bring a guy in whos represented bad people in the past. You know, he has a loose nickname of being the master of the dark arts when it comes to politics. Just a little cute nickname. Were you trying to move money for russian oligarchs . But we knew this. Its really just that theres these offtheledger payments. Hes going to have cover to come out with a Statement Like this because they dont have him cold. They have a handwritten ledger. They dont have any proof of transfers into his accounts. They dont have any proof of manafort taking control of this money. Hes seizing the initiative on that. Thats one of the birds of investigative reporting. But the next time he comes on and talks to you or any other journalist about crooked hillary and all these problems with the Clinton Foundation, the next logical question would be, well, lets talk about what you were involved in. Lets talk about some transparency when it comes to you. And it raises the ultimate
question that the Trump Campaign has really not spent time on, which is how would they be different . If theyre saying crooked hillary, shes no good, we cant put her in charge of this or that or the other, fine. What are your plans . What are the structures . What are you going to do to make sure no corruption of the kind youre decrying never gets near the white house . Paul manafort is not the one to sell that message. One thing is for sure. Manafort does not get rattled about this. His first interview when he came back on to the scene with trump, he did it with us. I went after this very early in the interview. Hes not moved. Hes not impressed by the reporting on this. He says hes owned what hes done in the past. Guys, thank you. Stick around. We have more to talk about. Other news, member of congress will soon receive notes written by fbi agents who attended Hillary Clintons threehour interview with the bureau. Now, what they wanted was transcripts. What they wanted was actual words. Theyre not going to get it, but is this going to be damaging and why . What could they have in their notes . Well give you a closer look next. [ ghost voice ] the name your price tool can show you Coverage Options to fit your budget. Oh ohhh she slimed me. [ laughs ]
[ clock titime. ] you only have so much. Thats why we want to make sure you wont have to wait on hold. And you wont have to guess when well turn up. Because after all we should fit into your life. Not the other way around. Some new developments in theHillary Clinton personal email controversy. We have sources telling cnn that members of congress are going to receive notes from the fbis threehour interview with clinton. Lets bring back Jackie Kucinich and errol louis. Whats the law behind this . 302s are the official fbi interview documents, right. Thats what makes a lie to the feds a crime, that its written down and its seen as perjury in itself. Theyre not going to get the 302s. Theyre going to get the notes from people in the room. This is kind of a compromise. How does it play, errol . My guess is that it will not quell the controversy. There will be some word somewhere in there that the republicans will seize on because remember, we heard from comey himself saying, you know, she was careless, there was this, there was that. Anything sort of an actual indictment, i think, is not going to satisfy clintons opponents. So they will start complaining. Im sure they have their talking points lined up in advance. They will find a word, a phrase that suggests some kind of a problem. They will blow it up into sort of a fullblown culpability and wonder why she hasnt been indicted and you go from there to the lock her up chants that happen daily at the trump rallies. This continues to have legs. Despite director comey coming out and saying this is not prosecutable, that she was reckless, but it was in the prosecutable. She was not under oath at the time. Theyre going to match it up with what she testified to the benghazi committee. As errol said, if theres any kind of discrepancy there, you bet theyre going to seize on it. Will we see more congressional hearings . Its not impossible at this point. Theres a little bit of an undercurrent of a disconnect between comey, which many people believe is unfair. Comey is one of the hardest hitters there is in that business, and his field agents who are doing this case, that maybe some of them felt there was a case to be made and he
didnt. Will something be revealed in these notes that gives a nod to that . Thats a problem. Thats what you would expect. The field agents are, for lack of a better word, cops. They look for and their main tool is crime. But optically, it would be a problem if you see overt evidence of that. Well, thats right. If there is any evidence or even a suspicion of it, it might find its way into those notes. Comey, of course, is not just sort of a political appointee who sort of understands how some of this stuff works, hes also an attorney. He kind of puts it through a legal filter that maybe some of his agents dont. Look, for the political class, the republicans, the Trump Campaign, they cannot outsource this. They cannot have the or expect to have the fbi do their work for them or even for their own campaign to do the work for them. It is going to be a question that is settled by the voters. Theres really just no getting around it. But theres an added wrinkle. Beyond the emails, it has been revealed that some of the content of those emails do show what some people believe is an overly cozy relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the state department. Some of Hillary Clintons top aides were talking to doug band at the Clinton Foundation. Theres supposed to be a bright line between the two. Some of the emails revealed there was not a bright line between the two. Thats what some of the field office fbi agents wanted to pursue further. And the Justice Department already took a pass. Theres a little bit of a dead end there already, unless perhaps they dig up something new. It does seem like that is a door that is closed at this point. Its become a little bit of an odd political dynamic. If we could put up some poll numbers, 63 of respondents to t