Discussed u. S. Sanctions against russia. With russias ambassador before taking office. Credibility is the biggest thing inside this white house. Keeping flynn as National Security adviser is not only embarrassing for this white house. I also think it is dangerous. Immigration and Customs Enforcement maintain that they are simply focusing on identifying and removing people in the country illegally. My wife is not a threat for the United States. Shes a great person. You know, shes a citizen. Well, rise and shine on a saturday morning. Im christi paul. Im victor blackwell. Good morning to you. Theres a lot of news coming out of the white house this morning. Lets get you up to speed and start with President Trump. Now very determined after the Court Rejects his travel ban he says he might quote, sign a brand new order. As early as monday. The president not ruling out also a Supreme Court challenge. And he also promises new security measures to keep america safe from terrorists. The unfortunate part is it takes time statutorily. Im going to win that battle. But we also have other options including just a new order. Is that your plan . Very well could be. I like to surprise you. We need speed for reasons of security. So it could very well be that we do that. In the meantime, the president is denying knowledge of the Michael Flynn firestorm saying he is not aware of reports that his National Security adviser had talked with russia about lifting sanctions on that country prior before President Trump took office. Also this morning, the president waking up in his Luxury Resort in florida, where hes hosting japanese Prime Minister shinzo abe this weekend. Security, trade, golf, all on the agenda there. First, though, lets talk more about President Trumps suspended travel ban. The Trump Administration weighing its options now, as to what theyll do next. Heres cnns justice correspondent pamela brown. Good morning, pamela. Well, victor and christi, though nothing has been ruled out, weve learned that the white house is not wanting to immediately repeal the 9th Circuit Decision for fear of losing in a 44 split. President trump even saying aboard air force one he may want to issue a new executive order with new security measures. I welcome you to the very famous white house. Reporter as the white house tweets its now halted controversial executive order and considers whether to issue a new one, President Trump speaking at a joint press conference at the white house is vowing to not give up the fight. Well be doing something very rapidly, having to do with additional security for our country. Youll be seeing that sometime next week. In addition, we will continue to go through the court process. And ultimately, i have no doubt that well win that particular case. Reporter trumps announcement comes in the wake of a strong rebuke from the 9th Circuit Court of appeals over his travel ban. He tweeted the decision was, quote, disgraceful. And again, sounded the alarm that theres an urgent need for the travel ban to keep the country safe. While ive been president which is just for a short period of time ive learned tremendous things that you could only learn, quite frankly, if you were in a certain position, namely, president. And there are tremendous threats to our country. We will not allow that to happen. Reporter but the court said the administration failed to present evidence to back up trumps National Security claim saying, quote, the government has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any countries named in the order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. Those countries listed, sudan, iran, iraq, somalia, yemen and libya and syria. And pushed back that matters of National Security should only be left up to the president. Say, quote, rather than present evidence to explain the need for the executive order, the government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree. Now the Trump Administration has to figure out whats next. There does seem to be chaos in the Trump Administration over the way the order was written and how to go forward here. And the president in honor of the 9th Circuit Court decision, he will likely wait until next week to respond with any action. Victor and christi. Pamela, thanks. Lets bring in sarah westwood, correspondent for the Washington Examiner and eugene scott, political reporter. Good morning. Eugene, lets start with you, the white house not immediately appealing the decision from the 9th circuit. That does not correspond with what we heard from the president s own mouth, see you in court. Walk us through the elements that led to the shift in approach to strategy. There was a significant shift, especially in less than 24 hours. Throughout the day, throughout friday, we saw various republican lawmakers come on cnn who have said themselves and said other people closer to the president were saying is it would perhaps be in the administrations best interest to go back to the drawing board and present a more narrow executive order than to go to court and risk losing this. One criticism of the executive order repeatedly is that the Trump Administration had not presented any evidence proving that letting in refugees and immigrants from these communities would harm the american citizens and National Security. What we could see next week in this rumored executive order coming out is one that has more evidence backing claims about National Security. So, sarah, with another executive order thats potentially going to come down on monday or tuesday. How aggressively do you expect the white house to fight for the one signed on january 27th . Thats such an interesting question, box the administration risks the entire policy if they continue to pursue this case who aggressively and who quickly. At the same time, its not in President Trumps nature to shy away from a fight. If you recall throughout his personal life, he has said he refers to fight legal battles than settle them because he perceives settling them as a way of admitting that youre wrong. It seems to be a growing consensus between democratic and republican lawmakers that a more narrow executive order could preserve the idea of this policy, which is still popular among his supporters, notwithstanding, the rolled out order. Lets talk about that, eugene, republicans have said about the executive order is that it wasnt properly vetted. If theres an executive order that is less string againent, t appears to be better vetted does the bottom fall out on the first one . I think trump supporters, people seeing trump were overwhelming favorable on that executive order favorably. We saw those who criticized it from the Republican Party saying it wasnt the policy that was problematic, it was the presentation. What the Trump Administration have to realize, it wasnt the rollout the problem, it was the actual policy. So whether or not theyre going to present something thats more appealing to people outside of their base remains to be seen. What do we know about the vetting of what is coming, sarah . Maybe its too early to ask or answer the question, im going to try it anyway. Is this getting the vetting that many believe the first one did not get. The department or Department Heads that should have been part of that conversation. Are they part of this conversation now . Well, look, what seems to be the main Sticking Point with the existing order was the fact that it was widely interpreted to apply to permanent legal residents, people who had green cards. And those people have the most Constitutional Rights of any other foreign nationals in the United States. If a new existing order was narrowly interpreted to apply only to refugees or people entering this country for the first time, it would have a better chance of surviving the inevitable court challenges. So what the Trump Administration can do, look at where the judge in seattle and the 9th Circuit Court of appeals stopped them the first time. And try to make the next executive order addressed. And that may satisfy the thousands of people we saw at airports across the country, on the weekend after the implementation of that executive order. Well talk more about that with our legal analyst in a moment. Sarah westwood, eugene scott, thanks so much. Thank you. Coming up a cnn exclusive, for the first time u. S. Investigators have corroborated now some of the details of that dossier compiled by a former british spy. And certain as hundreds of immigrants are take from their families and deported. And know advocates across the country are questioning the president s crackdown on illegal immigration. As after a dvt blood clot,ital i sure had a lot to think about. What about the people i care about . Including this little girl. And what if this happened again . I was given warfarin in the hospital, but wondered, was this the best treatment for me . So i asked my doctor. And he recommended eliquis. Eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots and reduces the risk of them happening again. Yes, eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots. Eliquis also had significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. Both made me turn around my thinking. Dont stop eliquis unless your doctor tells you to. Eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. Dont take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. If you had a spinal injection while on eliquis call your doctor right away if you have tingling, numbness, or muscle weakness. While taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily. And it may take longer than usual for bleeding to stop. Seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. Eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. Tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. Eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots. Plus had less major bleeding. Both made eliquis the right treatment for me. Ask your doctor if switching to eliquis is right for you. With the deduction findingombine superpower of ibm watson . Ah you get more money. Thats what you could get. H r block with watson. Get your taxes won. 13 minutes past the hour. We want to show you some of the new information cnn has learned about that Ongoing Investigation into allegations that were raised in that collection of memos. The memos that were created by a former British Intelligence agent. They were for opponents of then candidate donald trump. Cnn National Security correspondent jim sciutto and justice correspondent evan perez and pamela brown are working the story. Why is the Court Details contained in this dossier important . Well, jim, until now, u. S. Officials have said that none of the current allegations have been verified but local Law Enforcement and intelligence officials tell cnn that intelligence of foreign nationals confirm some of the conversations described in the dossier took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier. The corroboration is based on, quote, greater confidence in the dossier as they continue to actively investigate its contents. We should be clear that cnn has not confirmed the content of the calls or whether the content actually relates to then candidate trump. And none you the newly learned information relates to the salacious information in the dossier. When reached for comment, white house Spokesman Sean Spicer said, quote, we continue to be by cnns fake news reporting. Ed fbi, cia, and director of National Intelligence all had no comment on the sorry, jim. Theres a lot in the dossier. Help explain to our viewers what they have confirmed and not confirmed . Well, remember, the goal of the countercounterintelligence, for investigators to verify easily. To give them a sense of the credible of the author who was already somebody they were familiar with having credible sources. And the members detailed about a dozen conversations between senior russian official its and other russian individuals. So, that was one of the starting points. And one thing that the u. S. Has is a collection of foreign call intercepts, so they use that information to seek to verify some of the alleged conversations describe in the dossier. And u. S. Intelligence officials are emphasizing to us that the conversations they now verified were solely between foreign nationals including those in or tied to the russian government. Intercepted during routine intelligence gathering. But some of the individuals involved in the intercepted communications were known to u. S. Intelligence community as heavily involved in collecting information damaging to Hillary Clinton and helpful to donald tru trump. Now, sources wouldnt confirm which were intercepted due to the sensitive nature of the intelligence, jim. Weve been very careful throughout the store, reporting going back week, specifying what has been confirm and what has not been confirmed. Help us to explain to the viewers of what intelligence still cannot verify . One official stressed to cnn theyve not corroborated the quote, more salacious things in the dossier. Ill reminder the viewers cnn has not reported any of the salacious allegations. However, when we first reported this story, u. S. Law enforcement said they could not verify any parts of the memos but what theyre now saying theyre corroborating at least some. None of the officials would comment or confirm that they have prove of any alleged conversations or meetings between russian officials or u. S. Citizens including then candidate donald trump. And officials for the source say they have not had any compromising information about the president. We should remember that President Trump and his staff have repeatedly dismissed this dossier, jim, as phony. Jim sciutto, pamela brown and evan perez, thank you so much. Cnn has confirmed that National Security adviser Michael Flynn did in fact talk sanctions with the russian ambassador, before the president took the oath of office. What President Trump is saying, and what it could mean for Michael Flynn. Be the you who doesnt cover your moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Be the you who shows up in that dress. Who hugs a friend. Who is done with treatments that dont give you clearer skin. Be the you who controls your psoriasis with stelara® just 4 doses a year after 2 starter doses. Stelara® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. Some serious infections require hospitalization. Before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. Before starting stelara® tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have symptoms such as fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. Always tell your doctor if you have any signs of infection, have had cancer, if you develop any new skin growths or if anyone in your house needs or has recently received a vaccine. Alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. Some serious allergic reactions can occur. Do not take stelara® if you are allergic to stelara® or any of its ingredients. Most people using stelara® saw 75 clearer skin and the majority were rated as cleared or minimal at 12 weeks. Be the you who talks to your dermatologist about stelara®. Youve got mail what did you think id look like . Im wirey. Net. Uh, i love stuff. Give me more stuff. singing were no strangers to love i love that hey, i know a bunch of people whod like that. Whos that . The internet loves what youre doing. So build a site in under an hour at godaddy. Run around and desert you i want to get back to cnns exclusive reporting. For the first time u. S. Investigators have corroborated some of the details of that dossier compiled by a former british spy. I want to bring in cnns Global Affairs analyst kimberly dojo. When you look at this and what has been developing overnight, what is your first take on how russia will respond . Well, that russia understands it is under fire by the u. S. Media. And u. S. Intelligence. But Still Believes its got an ally in the white house in the form of the National Security adviser Michael Flynn. He is besieged. Some of his own aides are sharing things with the media which are rather damaging. But i believe its too early in this administration for them to ask him to leave. Theyre going to try to ride this one out. That is what i predict. But in the meantime, moscow is sitting back and watching this disarray between different elements of the u. S. Government. And probably enjoying it. Okay. Lets talk about lets talk of adviser flynn. Is this survivable for him . You mentioned, obviously, its early on, this is not the kind of publicity that the Trump Administration wa