That you know, it is false advertising. He sparked a lot of people because of something that is absolutely untrue. Again, you cannot get elected in this country. I dont see the shape of the electorate to get elected without about 35 of the hispanic vote. Romney had 27 , mccain had 33 . George w. Bush had 44 . Even though trump says he is going to win the hispanics, i doubt it. I am not sure it has been that successful. Peter let me open it up. Questions, please. We start with the gentleman there. Thank you. I wondered if you could talk about the role of education and the economic relationship between u. S. And mexico and economic coordination collaboration between the two countries. Prof. Shambaugh i think there are a lot of things that go back and forth in terms of teachers or students or attempts in coordination and cooperation. I think it is a place where having nafta or having a freetrade agreement that make some of these flows a bit easier in terms of education is important. I think the other thing is, honestly, improving education on both sides of the border is a crucial piece because as i was saying, i think often people look at globalization and talk about trade agreements causing certain things when really it is changing from the global economy. One of the things we know is that upgrading the skill, upgrading the ability to work with technology and improving standards on both sides of the border is a crucial part to ensure that both countries are successful in the global economy. Sec. Gutierrez there are a lot of u. S. Students in mexico. It is surprising how many mexican students are in mba programs in the u. S. Words are used on both sides of the border. Mexico city is like a big billboard for the american brands. There is such intimacy between the two countries that on one hand it is ridiculous but somewhat painful that we are talking about it the way we are. One of the things that we have to think about is you build a wall to lock out your neighbor. That is the kind of stuff that 10, 20 years from now creates revolutionary movements. But we just forget about it. We are not thinking about, what are we really doing . How is this going to be perceived 30 years for now from now . It feels good because it gets an applause line and someone may get a nomination because of it. Peter other questions . I am a student here. I am wondering, as the u. S. Signs a trade deal with atlantic and pacific trade partners, particularly tpp, the you think our trade relationship with mexico in the future will decrease our exposure to mexican economy, especially as the gravity theory falls by the wayside . Prof. Shambaugh i do not expect tpp in particular to decrease our trading relationship with mexico. We already have, obviously, a trade agreement with mexico. Tpp goes further in the number of dimensions than previous agreements we have with the number of signatories of tpp already. I think it is something that would make all of north america, u. S. , canada, and mexico, more integrated into the pacific economy than they would be already but i dont think they would be less integrated with one another. I think the Common Supply chains across the border would be more important, frankly, then exports to the asian market. It is not something i would expect to decrease the tie at all. Sec. Gutierrez i agree with that. Mexico has a border with the u. S. And that will never go away. That is an amazing asset. Since the 1980s there has been this manufacturing culture developing in mexico going all the way back to dennings, physical process control, all of those. It was taken seriously throughout the country. Mexican manufacturers are very good and very competitive. U. S. Companies planted in mexico will tell you that is probably one of the most productive plants. It is a good hub for manufacturing, the border with the u. S. I bet on that longterm. Thank you for being here. I am with the embassy of mexico. Why is it so hard to explain to people why trade is good . Globalization does not just exist in the u. S. , but in europe, mexico, all over the world. Why has it been so difficult for politicians to explain to people that trade is a good thing that benefits the general population, or maybe there are negative things that half have to be taken into account . Sec. Gutierrez there are 3 million jobs in the u. S. The chamber has a higher number. Jobs associated with exports in mexico. You have to ask yourself, with those 3 million jobs would those 3 million jobs be in existence or more or less if we did not have nafta . The problem with trade is if you look at the three countries and look at 25 years before nafta, 25 years after nafta, the three numbers are better in the three countries. It is remarkable. Anyone who has followed mexico at all before nafta, you had inflation rates of 6100 . Usually had a crisis at the end of a sixyear period. You dont see that anymore. It has been remarkable since nafta came in. The problem is it is anecdotal. I know a neighbor who has a cousin who lost his job because the plant went to mexico. It is true and it is real. The National Numbers are better. How do you reconcile the National Numbers are better but some communities have been impacted . I think there are things that we can do. We do have a program for trade adjustment assistance to help communities that have been impacted by trade. But the numbers are there. The numbers show that trade has been good and nafta has been a tremendous success. Not for everyone, but for the country as a whole. Prof. Shambaugh i think the question is to why trade does not resonate is a positive force is a complicated one. There is a story about a person who moves to a town and build a building and sell things in the town much cheaper. They must have an incredible technological advance. They open the door and they see a rail line to a port. And they are bringing in goods from out of town. People suddenly hate the person they love before. I think that is not necessarily a question economists answer but sociologist. I do think one of the answers is people get to vote on trade. They do not get to vote on technology. They do not always recognize the shifts they are responding to our technological shifts. In the United States, manufacturing goes up. Manufacturing employment goes down because we get more efficient at making the stuff we make. We also import things. We export things, too. When plants shut down because a plant is moved overseas, you see less attention on the plants that are built here. We have bmws in the united bmws in the United States. People have jobs and that factory building german cars for export. I do think one of the reasons is we dont necessarily do enough for impacted workers. There are a lot of them that this administration has proposed over time, that people who are making minimum wage or displaced over time are finding a new job. If they took a lower wage to get some sort of wage insurance for a few years, they build up their skills in a different industry. I think there are a lot of Different Things you can do that will cushion the dislocations that do happen, due to trade or technology. In some sense it does not matter why. Trade adjustment assistance is an important idea but because it is hard to say, did you lose your job to trader technology, it winds up hard for people to get it. Broadbased support for people who lose jobs makes it more likely for the public to have a popular view. Sec. Gutierrez ceos go into the factories in office and say thanks to trade, this is what it means to our company and for your jobs. I think it has to be company by company. It is hard to make a national argument. Peter time for one more question. Someone with their hand raised here. My name is gabriella. I work for the department of agriculture, but i have an interest in conducting research from the particular state i am from in mexico. They are one of the Top Producers of agricultural produce. Immigration is going to have a great impact because currently they have about 20 of their population of Agricultural Workers are here in the United States. That is what i learned recently. Having the Immigration Program in place or agricultural worker in place increase, that will take away some of their labor. They are not particularly interested in that. My question is does it really benefit the states such as the one in mexico to have such programs . And the fact that it has the Free Trade Agreement . Sec. Gutierrez you mean doeS Immigration to the u. S. Hurt that state . Yes. Sec. Gutierrez it is an interesting question. In 1970, the average mexican woman had seven children. 1970. Today, it is about 2. 2. The u. S. Is about 2. 1. 2. 1 tends to be there is a number where it tends to be holding steady. There is going to come a day not far into the future where there are no mexican immigrants or there are not enough as we need because they also need the workforce because the population is not growing as fast. There is a big number of young people so there is a lot affront way. A lot of runway. But there will come a day where we are going to wish where we had more mexican immigration. Peter let me end by reminding everyone that on her website our website, we have a series of social media tools. They are educational tools. They are tools for all audiences, young, middleaged, and older. As i learned from my colleagues, we have to direct at the young crowd. I urge you to use those tools. I urge you to spread some of the titles on twitter. Take a look at the video we have an spread those around. I think it is important to use this event as a one for the educational event we will have in the next few months. I want to thank both of you for joining in the Previous Panel as well. I want to thank my colleagues for working so hard on this. It has been great and it is a really important cause. Thank you all for coming. [applause] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2016] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] as i mentioned before, i never felt the urge to make money. What turned me on in the 1960s was to meet policy. That is always what drove me. Tonight, a twopart interview with former Public Interest lawyer and politician mark green, author of bright a generational,. A generational memoir youve got to wake up and go to sleep and say i want to so much, if you do everything, you win. Announcer part 1 airs tonight at 8 00 eastern on cspans q a. Ont two will air tonight cspan 2. Returnsr the house after the fourth of july break with gun legislation. We could see debate on that early as wednesday. Also iris spending and an extension on faa funding. Watch live house coverage on speed on cspan. The housemates again on wednesday to consider a judicial nomination. You can watch the senate live on cspan 2. For more on the week ahead and that anticipated debate in the house on gun measures, we spoke with a congressional reporter. Billy house, bloomberg news, you write that speaker ryan plans a house vote on gun provision after the sit in by democrats. What exactly are the main details . Aboutis more counterterrorism, not gun control. And safety and security act. It includes a provision to prevent terrorists from buying guns. It is much like the bill in the. Enate from senator cornyn but the democrats in the house and senate have already rejected that idea as insufficient. Host it is pretty close to what the majority whip in the senate had offered. And the senate blocked that. So why do republicans think that is the appropriate measure here . Democrat are a house in a Conference Call early this afternoon, you are saying that it was because you are letting the National Rifle association write your legislation for you. And they want to limit whatever as muchcts of that bill as possible. Whether that is true or not, who knows . But certainly, House Republicans are feeling pressured to do gunsng with the word in it, but perhaps not do so much that it might upset one of their big backers, the nra. About thealked democrats might be planning. Nancy pelosi released a statement that reads in part that democrats will continue to push House Republicans to give the American People a vote on meaningful gun violence prevention measures that will save lives and protect our communities from terrorism, with expanded strength in background checks and manyfold nofly no buy legislation. So what are you hearing about the planned for House Democrats in the coming week, both on and off the floor . Exactly, what we are talking about is the same things that immigrants were asking for last week. They want background checks on gun cells. And they want to their government and they want to ban sales on the government nofly list. Stepped up on the heels of the orlando shooting were 49 people were killed. Talked with john larson john larson of connecticut tells lewis haveand written to speaker ryan and hope to have a meeting with him early next week. If there amendments cannot be put on this republican bill, dilatory tactics tied to the 1960s Civil Rights Movement may be considered. Not so certain that they will do another sitin. There might not be a second act on that. But for instance, he said protest march. What kind of march that might be, either a jericho like circling of the capital or National March 2, i dont know, the Lincoln Memorial or anywhere else in 10 anywhere washington come i dont know. But that is what they are talking about. They hope to have the speaker and what spills onto that, if anything happens, to get their stuff into that republican bill. Host House Speaker paul ryan called the democrats sitin on the house floor a publicity stunt. And the Republican Leadership was looking at all their options, talking to the parliamentarian, the sergeant at arms. What sort of rules exactly are they talking about . What kind of rules were potentially broken by the democrats during this sitin . With regardsules to whether the house is actually in session, what you can and cannot do. Rulesnnot disrupt other you cannot disrupt. Other rules are a little meeker. You can take photos or videos of action on the floor. All the things that happen in the senate do technically occur until late in the morning when they quickly jam votes in most of that happened when the house wasnt technically in session. But you are right, the speaker said he is looking into what can be done. Not quite sure what can be done other than, you know, forcing them off the floor, arresting them perhaps, democrats that wont move. Arresting the of civil rights icon john lewis on tv is something they really dont want to have ingrained going into the november elections. Im sure that Speaker Paul Ryan doesnt want that forever imprinted in a 2020 campaign president , if he mounts one. I do know the republicans have advised him, please, for whatever we do, lets not handcuff these people. Billy house is Congressional Correspondent for bloomberg news. Twitter. You can read his reporting at bloomberg. Com. Thanks very much for being with us. I enjoyed it. Thank you. Announcer washington journal live every day with policy issues that impact he appeared this morning, kelly jane torn, managing editor of the daily and talk about washingtonatch journal beginning live at 7 00 eastern this morning. Join the discussion. This weekend on cspans cities tour, along with our Comcast Cable partners, we will explore the history and literary life of provo, utah. Under tv, we will visit mens rea books. Visit moons rare books. Thomas payne went to robert bell and wanted to have this printed. He wanted the proceeds to buy soldiers mittens. After it went through three printings, they had a falling out. So thomas payne allowed anybody to print it. He lowered the price and said anybody could print it. That is the reason why that book is so wellknown imprinted. Announcer and the author of peculiar people talks about as amormonism in america religious minority in the origins of the animosity. They fit awkwardly in that. Not only are they religious minority, but one that overtime has figured in disproportionately visible ways in the debates about religion. Announcer on American History tv, take a tour of the Brigham YoungUniversity Museum of paleontology. The curator talks about how the fossils were gathered from utah and surrounding states and how jensen changed the way fossils and those are displayed. When you can hide armature and the still supports, the animal looks more a life, in the sense that you get the feeling that these are bones, but it brings life to these bones. Announcer and James Spencer fleming, professor of history at Brigham Young university, tells how mormon pioneers settled sully city. Families33 norman established provo in 1839. This weekend, watch cspan cities tour in provo utah provo, utah. Workingan cities tour, with our cable affiliates and visiting cities across the country. Announcer coming up next, a review of the Supreme Courts most recent term. Then a Senate FormerForeign Relations hearing on combating isis. At 7 00, washington journal is live with your calls and a look at todays headlines. Announcer the Supreme Court ended its term under with decisions on abortion, gun control and public corruption. Talked legal experts about the Big Decisions and surprises we saw from the court. At this event, hosted by the american constitution society. It is one hour and a half. Good afternoon, everybody. I would like to welcome you to acss annual Supreme Court review. I am caroline fredrickson