Transcripts For CSPAN2 Book Discussion On Hillarys America 2

CSPAN2 Book Discussion On Hillarys America September 11, 2016

Succeeds in introducing thousands of people with these ideas during numerous conferences on internships, campus lectures, americans for freedom chapters, center for entrepreneurship and free enterprise, and the National Journalism center. In 1998, the foundation stepped forward to save the beloved ranch. His branch has been fundamental in helping with our ability to pass on his ideas to future generations. For more information on our mission or our programs, you can visit www. Yaf. Org or call 1800usa1776. Our speaker today dinesh dissesa former policy analyst at the white house this also served at the American Enterprise institute and the fellow at the Hoover Institution at stanford university. In addition he served as the president of the Kings College from 2010 to 2012. In 1995 he published the end of racism that became the most Controversial Book of the time and the national bestseller. How the ordinary man became an extraordinary leader was the first book to make the case for the intellectual and political importance. In 2002 he published his New York Times bestseller whats so great about america which is critically acclaimed for its patriotism. His 2003 book letters to the Young Conservatives have become a handbook for the generation of conservatives inspired by this title and ideas. The dinesh stand up as we thought only has he encountered Great Success in literature but also film and he managed to infiltrate liberal hollywood and has produced the most successful political documentaries in history. His most recent a criticall criy acclaimed documentary of the news cycle from now until november launched nationwide and has already become the highest grossing documentary. Before we bring into the stage, take a look at this. Who are these democrats it is my judgment was sentenced to spend eight monthss in a confinement it all began when the Obama Administration tried to shut me up. What did i learn . All crime is about stealing. The big criminals are still at large. The system doesnt go after them because they run the system. Its time to go behind the curtain and discover the soul of the Democratic Party. The Civil Rights Act allows colored man to sit at the same table lighter white guests. [inaudible] to the Democratic Party white has all of this been swept under the rug . We are not even talking about ancient history. As long as they continue to ravish we will take you. The democrats went from slavery to enslavement. Thats how you get a corrupt unions. Social engineering and social control. One of the members is secured. The opening video at the convention, the government is the one thing we all belong to. What are the democrats hiding . When you follow the money there are very few. What is the goal of the Democratic Party to steal the most valuable things the world has ever produced . What if their plan is to steal america . Who will stop them now . [applause] thank you very much. It is for me always an honor and a privilege to be here at the Young Americas Foundation summer conference. Im thrilled to be accompanied by my wife. We are both immigrants, debbie is from Venezuela Venezuela comt from india. Whenever i look at you guys, i always think about when i first came to america i was 17yearsold and i was an Exchange Student from india going to Public School in arizona and remember to send in on new york city i looked out the window and i saw the skyline of new york and the statue of liberty and a strange feeling came over me because i realized my life from that moment on what the totally different. I realized even without being political intuitively that i was moving from the margin of the world to the center and i realized i would be able to do things with my life that i wouldnt be able to do if i had stayed back in india. Here ive experienced the American Dream which isnt just a dream of economic success or opportunity. Its the dream of being able to be the architect of your own destiny. Its the dream of being able to write the script of your own life and for here in america if your parents say to you what do you want to be when you grow up. At the end of the day they know that its you who will supply the answer to that question. Fast forward about 25 years, it was about a year ago i found myself locked up in a federal Confinement Center under the supervision of the bureau in the Obama Administration with 120 season hoodlums. Id given 20,000 to a College Friend of mine running for the senate. Normally this is an offense when there isnt any corruption you arent trying to buy favors or do any kind of underhanded dealings. Normally this is referred to the federal Election Commission and its not a criminal matter at all. You get a fine and maybe some Community Service by the Obama Administration prosecuted me with the full force of the law and unleashed the battery of fbi agents on me to try to get the assistant where a hidden wire as if i were al capone and there i was in the federal court from hearing the balis bark out the phrase United States of america versus dinesh dsouza. Kind of a chilling feeling down your spine when you are an immigrant. Now, did i exceed campaignfinance law, yes. Right about the same time that my case was migrating through the court another guy. In any event, he gave 180,000 in straw donations to Hillary Clinton and a group of other democratic candidates. He was also found guilty of witness tampering and boasted about his corruption about trying to buy these politicians. He gets no confinement, so i mentioned this because justice is not simply a matter of did you break the law. Its also a matter of does the penalty for the crime. Did the others who did the same thing that the same penalty . I think we can see from my case that the progressive justice that i was subjected to was a sham. This was a selective prosecution. Now why do i think that . Because just a few months earlier i had made the film 2016, Obamas America in which i got not only into his world but also into obamas had. People wil will see what makes u think the president of the United States, a relatively busy man would care what you did . The reason i know he did this because right after the film came out, the attacks on me and the movie began to appear on a website called barack obama. Com. If you read these closely in their mixture of arrogance come in coherence one could recognize the unmistakable signature of the man who currently occupies the white house. So, this was why i found myself in federal confinement. Now initially the administration wanted to lock me up for up to two years. By the way, have they succeeded there is no way that i could have made this movie in fact i would be locked up now. But instead, i got this Confinement Center in which i would spend the night in a dorm about the size of this room with 120 others who have served prison sentences. And if they were not white collar. There were five or eight whitecollar criminals. The rest of them were drug smugglers, armed robbers, the whole gamut of very rough guides and initially, i i was kind of terrified because i thought to myself first of all the majority were hispanics but everybody seemed to be in some group into the games are complex. The hispanics were in one, the american hispanics called us outsiders have another and the mexicans had their games so i could talk to this guy because he would want to kill me. So i did consider starting my own gang, the asian indian gang. [laughter] but after about a month, i thought to myself look, im in a strange place like an anthropologist in a strange land and this isnt a place you normally find conservatives. Im noi am not going to walk doe hall and see Charles Krauthammer or george well. So i said lets me talk to these guys and learn the ideology of the criminal class. My previous exposure to this ideology was limited to the viewings of the Shawshank Redemption in which i had the idea that all criminals insisted that they didnt give it, they are totally innocent. For 25 years ive looked at american politics as a kind of debate. We are the conservatives, and we believe this, and the liberals believe that, and the republicans are for equality of rights, and the democrats are for equality of outcomes and blah, blah, blah. It is the view of the criminal underclass that this whole way of thinking about american politics is total and complete nonsense. Why . Because human nature isnt motivated that way. Human nature is not motivated by an urge to debate. Human beings actually are motivated by inquisitiveness and greed and lust is lust and rage and anger and hatred and revenge. And if these motives actually drive human life, why should politics be immune or exempt . In other words, we need a wider angle of vision to see politics in its full motive. A motive that is not merely idealistic, but also realistic. Why do people do what they do . Why do the clintons do what they do . What motivates obama . So id like to talk about that briefly this morning. Ill begin by talking a little bit about the Democratic Party. Now, im a creature of the reagan revolution and, in fact, reagan used to say in the 80s i didnt leave the Democratic Party, it left me. It left me. Now, you get the idea from this that the Democratic Party was actually a good party. And it was actually humming along pretty well until maybe the late 60s or the Mcgovern Campaign when it kind of went off the rails. It left him. But i regret to say that this is one area where, in a way, reagan was wrong. And what i mean by that is in adult life later as i began to dig into this subject and began to research it, i began to realize that, no, the Democratic Party has actually had a sordid strain that has defined this party from the very beginning. From the very beginning. And the reason we dont know about it, i didnt know about it, reagan didnt know about it is because of the success of progressive his or to have yoking my historiography. The progressives have been ingenious at covering their tracks. And ill start by giving a small example of this, because it actually pertains to one of the really horrific events of the 20th century, the holocaust. So in the 1930s, the Democratic Party was fascinated not only by fascism, but also by naziism. They liked it. And if this seems a little unbelievable, young john f. Kennedy went to nazi germany in the 30s and came back super excited about hitler. In fact, full of praise of hitler. He called him a legend. There are people who dont like hitler, but theyre jealous of him. He said the nazis claim to be superior, they claim that the nordic people are better than everybody else, and he goes, thats cuz they are. Thats cuz they are. This is jfk. And by the way, i should tell you that nothing im about to say this morning is controversial in the sense of its debated whether it occurred. You can actually google jfknazi germany 1930s on your phone, and in 30 seconds youll see that what i just said to you is true. Fdr was enamored by mussolini. Fdr actually dispatched members of his brain trust to go to italy to study italian fascism because he thought it was more progressive than the new deal. And he thought that he could import ideas from italian fascism here to america. This was not a oneway fascination, it was actually a mutual admiration society. Mussolini reviewed fdrs book in an italian magazine. He loved it. He goes, my conclusion upon reading this book is this guy is one of us, hes a fascist. This is mussolini. Now, after world war ii progressive historians looked at all this, and they went, whoa. Fascism now carries the order of the holocaust, the gas chambers, dachau. We cant have this kind of stuff in the textbooks. Young people may find out about it. Lets make sure we prudently leave it out. Were not going to lie about it, were just not going to say anything about it. So this is a small but telling example of a way in which two of great progressive figures of the 20th century, jfk and fdr, have been, i you may say, protected, protected by the progressive left. Lets continue with fdr for a moment, because fdr, when he was elected, wanted to push through the new deal. But it was difficult to push through the new deal because he needed the support of other democrats, and the Democratic Party in fdrs time was racist to the core. Racist to the core. Fdr needed the racist democrats to get the new deal through. So he goes to the racist democrats, and he basically says please support the new deal. Ill give you all kinds of benefits, well build a Tennessee Valley project in your neighborhood and so on. But the racist democrats said thats not enough. Well vote for the new deal if you, fdr, agree to block all antilynching laws that are proposed by the republicans. Fdr agrees. The racist democrats say in addition to that, we want to make sure that the two main occupations that blacks are in namely, Domestic Service and Agricultural Labor are excluded from most new deal programs. No new deal for blacks. Fdr agrees again. So here is the progressive hero of the 20th century completely in bed with the worst racists in america who were a critical part of getting his new deal through. Once again, this is a fact. A fact. Now, lets back up and take in the big picture because the big picture can be summarized as follows the Democratic Party, who founded it . Right away thats kind of a mystery. Who started this Democratic Party . We know that Abraham Lincoln was kind of the founder of the Republican Party. Who started the Democratic Party . Maybe it was fdr. No, it cant be fdr. There was a Democratic Party in the 19th century. Maybe it was thomas jefferson. No, it wasnt jefferson. Jeffersons party was called the democratic Republican Party, and it split and later became the Democratic Party, later the Republican Party. So Andrew Jackson. Andrew jackson was the founder of the Democratic Party. Now, Andrew Jackson is a controversial figure. Hes controversial because of his indian wars. He was known as kind of a savage indian fighter. But i want to highlight a side of Andrew Jackson that is never talked about. There are whole biographies on Andrew Jackson that never mention this, and that is Andrew Jackson as somebody who figured out how to profit greatly from public policy. Profit from public policy. So heres what jackson would do. He would be getting ready to have a fight with the indians and drive them off their land and push them further west, and the whole idea was that this land would then be auctioned off to settlers. But since Andrew Jackson knew which land was going to become available before the fight, he would send in his private surveyors who would determine the value of that land which would then be reported privately to him. He would then contact his buddies who were investors, and those guys would bid on the land before it even became available for sale. In fact, they would bid on the land before the indians had even been thrown off the land. In this way, Andrew Jackson went from to use a phrase from Hillary Clinton dead broke to becoming one of the richest men in the country. He was worth in todays money over 100 million. And be he took this money, and he bought himself a big slave plantation in tennessee. Now, why do i tell you this . Because the roots of the Clinton Foundation can be found in the landstealing policies of Andrew Jackson. This stuff that we see today in which the clintons are able to, you may say, market policy. Think for a moment about the clintons, if i can fast forward a little bit here. The clintons, well, hillary was derided for saying she was dead broke, but it is true the clintons didnt come into politics with money. Weve had president s who were rich. Fdr was rich. Jfk was rich. But they were rich before. The clintons came into politics, and they didnt have a whole lot of money. So how do you go from 0 to 300 million on a government salary . How do you do that . How does your foundation accumulate a total of 3 billion when you havent done anything . You didnt invent the iphone. You didnt start a business. How do you do that . Is there even a plausible way to imagine how that could legitimately occur . No. No. In other words, what were dealing with here is crookery. Were dealing with people who have learned how to market policy for private benefit. Now, back to the

© 2025 Vimarsana