Transcripts For FBC Cavuto Coast To Coast 20161014 : vimarsa

FBC Cavuto Coast To Coast October 14, 2016

Were looking for a little bit of balance in the media. Welcome, everybody, im neil cavuto coast to coast is right now. This is something in all seriousness you should step back, wonder what the heck is going on, as donald trump prepares to address an audience in North Carolina . I want to show you something regardless whether youre a fan of his, his opponent or those other two Third Party Candidates, this is breakdown of coverage of the two socalled crises, donald trump and what he has said on videotape. And wikileaks emails that keep coming and coming and coming. Look at that. On all three major networks, scant coverage of the Hillary Clinton crisis. Lots with the donald trump crisis. In fact, picking up about a third, a third of their broadcasts. That is not even dealing with the commercial disruptions. I want to show you something that just over the last couple days, that factor of attention has only grown by about, what seven to one margin. The Media Coverage on donald trump and its tape and on those emails and wikileaks. All right. I can do the math here. It is not fair. It is not balances. It is not even close to being even. That is the problem. Tim graham joins us, nrc director of media analysis. You look at that, and you got to say, right away, tim, whoa, something is out of whack here. What do you think . Well, it is liberal media as they are in this race. I mean they have decided in this race that they are going to make sure donald trump is defeated. And theyre going to spend all their time talking about trump and how unacceptable he is. Even when theyre doing the wikileaks coverage it has this whole tone, well, were talking about this but this is just what trump and his russian backers want us to do. So, what theyre really not covering in these wikileaks emails is the proof of absolute collusion between the Hillary Clinton campaign and reporters who are very willing to do her bidding, who are willing to say, please, have veto power over our articles, you know. Please let us help you move along your agenda. Her aides openly talk which aide is great at teeing up stories for them and theyre never disappointed. Really sounds like the help. Neil one thing very clear in just these numbers, the reason why i wanted to get into it in the show this way, all right, youre clearly showing a bias on what crisis or what embarassment is bigger in your eyes, collective medias eyes. Youre dismissing what is coming out in the emails, maybe because so many Mainstream Media types are caught up in the emails. Or you just dont think it is beneficial to your broadcast or maybe your future, to, keep talking about them. So you talk about his stuff. But, i think it is pretty glaring. Im all for it. If you want to go into the trump stuff, have at it, would it kill you to take the seven to one differential to two to one or three to one . That is what is pretty glaring here. A lot of times when the Media Research center does a count, they say you guys are conservative but you cant fight the numbers. Why this year we decided well count minutes because that is one thing they can not deny. And clearly, youre right, if you were watching evening news last night, it was this denunciation of trump, that denunciation of trump, here commish shell obamas denunciation of trump. Here is never trump republicans denunciation of trump. Neil that is the story. That the story and that becomes focus. Anything that pops up in the emails, are exhausting keeping up with them, nothing, nothing at all. Well there is complete hypocrisy of this. I think as a dad, and as a husband, i take sexual harrassment in the work place seriously but these people have gotten religion on this in a way they never did in the 1990s. They smeared the women when they werent ignoring them in the 1990s. When bill clinton was accused and now suddenly, this is the most serious issue we could possibly confront and thats why so many people tell gallup and other pollsters, we dont believe these people. These guys wear donkey ears when they come on television. Neil it is pretty glaring when you see numbers and amount of devoted to each. Tim graham, thank you very much much. As tim pointed out coverage devoted to scandals and accusers, there wasnt a mad media dash to get Clinton Accusers on air. They didnt waste a nanosecond talking to those who were charging the same about donald trump including one woman whose allegations go back more than three decades. So think about that. And also think about, if they are so eager to get these trump accuse on, which is fine, where is the eagerness to get accusers of the president of the United States on . What doesnt jibe with that . We have charlie gasparino. Democratic strategist here and we have independent women forums patrice lee. Patrice, begin with you, whatever peoples side or biases, we all have biases thats fine, this math, this disproportionate attention to some guests over other guests, it is pretty glaring. What do you think . Patrice what do you think . Okay. I will just leave you with that pregnant thought. Charlie, is there a sense youre getting this will be the rest of the campaign . That this is going to be this way and just get used to it . Listen, there are two differences. Bill clinton is not running for president obviously. The media, as a former reporter, for newspapers, i can tell you, i could tell you that they have an excuse not to cover this. But neil they didnt back then either, truth be told. Now this is my point. If you look at the coverage of the bill clinton, quote, unquote, bimbo eruptions as they were known by derisively by James Carville and other political operatives, they were able to sell that theory to the Mainstream Media in large part. Not like New York Times didnt cover what went on with clinton and allegations regarding him against women but they covered it as less of a major story because, guess what. He was their guy in office and he got the impression they were looking to minimize it. Theyre not doing that here. This is like fullon, you know, donald trump is way guilty before anything. And i think, you know, that is the legacy of this election. Now, donald trump may be guilty. I dont know. I mean he definitely said something horrible on a tape which makes you think that he has some sort of these inclinations but i will tell you this, he is not been given the benefit of the doubt. And bill clinton was. I was, i was at the wall street journal at the time. This is premr. Murdoch buying it. I remember how bill clinton was covered and it was nothing, and i remember how the times covered it as well. It was nothing compared to the fullon assault on trump were getting right now. Neil well i do remember, maybe you can help me with this, i know your views on this subject, fair game to go after donald trump, i agree with you, go ahead, when i dont see the same zeal in raising these other issues or chasing down those women who were charging far worse of bill clinton when he was president of the unitedjusts a fair is fair, right . It is not even close to approximating even. What do you think . Well, i think one, bill clinton is not running for president. I think that is one point. That is why theyre not covering it as much. Neil but his wife, charge, that his wife enabled, enabled a lot of this or worse, went after these women and their charges. She may have discovered later on she was wrong but saying fair game or not . The. We, one, she didnt enable it any way shape, or form. She may have been in defense of her husband, which would have been appropriate but i would say, you had Kenneth Starr, who was the avenging angel on a lot of this stuff, especially for conservatives back in the 90s. It was all revisited then. We impeached a president over this whole thing. I was a teenager in high school and my mom spent half the time i didnt know what that thing was on Monica Lewinskys blue dress. Neil you were a teenager . Now im really old and really angry at you. Seriously, you raised a good point. Patrice, my biggest thing, i hope microphone is good with you now, were not even approximating fairness. I went back to, in the prior guest showing the time and minutes on broadcast devoted to the donald trump stories and believe me im not condoning it or saying that it shouldnt be covered. Very little to wick youky leaks coverage that is wikileaks coverage on and on, day after day, more and more say concerning. There is just no approximating fairness here, not even close. Neil patrice first. I mean lets look, look at headlines, look at amount of time spent on this issue. But when you talk to americans, i was reading in the miami herald this morning, i dont want to hear about hillary and donald. I want to know what their policies are to get people back to work in my neighborhood. What will they do about Social Security reform . That is what americans are really listening for, even more interestingly i think, americans are sick and tired of corrupt politicians undermining trust in institutions we care about. Were not hearing about the irs targeting conserve tough donors and organizations. Were not sundry list of institutions that have been twisted in favor you know a lot of progressive policies and frankly the clintons. To support what they have been doing. That is a great point. But i will say this part of the reason why that is occurring because donald trump has not really raised those issues enough i believe. But i think he should go back and, do some of this, you have to go back think of how the media covered stuff back in the 90s, the clinton scandals. I was there. I was at journal at time. Neil were you in high school at the time . Definitely not in high school, okay but i will tell you this i remember watching the capital hill gang, a popular talk show on cnn, when the Monica Lewinsky tape thing, first came out. They looked like bill clinton was going to get impeached then because he lied under oath. That was the suspicion, that they had proof of that. You know, they treated like it was the death of a president , not an impeaching of a corrupt president. And i think that is difference between what we see now and then. Seems like the media, i mean i had many, many arguments with colleagues back then who say, you cant impeach clinton over lying under oath about neil charlie you were arguing with colleagues . What their point was, these are journalists who said this, neil. These were journalists who said, high crimes and misdemeanors. What bill clinton lying under oath is neither. He shouldnt be impeached. They were coming to the defense. So much different. This is pileon with trump. Im not say what trump did is right. That video, noxious language gives you rationale he might do other stuff obviously but neil im for going after that. I dont say ignore it. I do not say ignore it in the debate or dont bring it up in the debate. Im saying try to feign some resemblance here. I will run through this show, the shark thing that escaped from the cage, because i think that shark is the equivalent of media biting and chasing stories it wants and not fairness that will be represented by said diver in cage. So that will be my metaphor for the next couple hours on this show. That thats what the American People are being treated to. I a agree. By the way. Neil really . A couple things, neil, that you have the fact this was heavily explored in the 90s. All of these women were interviewed under oath by Kenneth Starr. Kenneth starr didnt want to use Juanita Broaddrick neil think about what youre saying. Heavily explored, no need then, why go into this, ancient history. It was years ago. Now you have cnn, tripping over themselves to get, to these women who are making charges decades old, it is okay now. Okay for them to be because theyre new. Theyre new charges, neil. Neil all right. Going to be a heart beat away from the presidency. I hated Kenneth Starr investigation. I remember standing next to a fax machine when it was coming out, going for the stain reference. It was disgusting fair is fair. Neil i was in grade school at the time. I dont remember these references. But again, we have the media update here. This is the establishment media now. Chasing these stories. A lot of you have seen to think, this was a shark escaping the cage. It is media, a metaphor, for biting and chomping on whatever can bring a conservative candidate down . We bite on it. You decide. Something like that. Stick with us. Is there anybody in there . When a moment turns romantic, why pause to take a pill . Or stop to find a bathroom . Cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. Tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. Do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas for pulmonary hypertension, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. Do not drink alcohol in excess. Side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. To avoid longterm injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. If you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. Ask your doctor about cialis and a 200 savings card. Perfect driving record. Until one of you clips a food truck. Then your rates go through the roof. Perfect. For drivers with accident forgiveness, Liberty Mutual wont raise your rates due to your first accident. And if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you twentyfour seven. Call for a free quote today. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Neil folks at Judicial Watch wanted to find out what was on Hillary Clintons email server and what she knew and when she knew it. You know the drill. They did get some answers. I dont know if what they wanted well get to that in a second with guy doing questioning. Blake burman with the details. Reporter Hillary Clinton responding to 25 Court Ordered questions from the conservative Advocacy Group Judicial Watch. David kendall provided written responses on behalf of his client. As you just said, there was very little here to it. Kendall objected to roughly 2 3 of the questions and said in 20 different cases, that clinton could not recall the specific topic. Im going to give you one example here. Judicial watch asking clinton if she was ever advised or warned that her email setup could violate federal recordkeeping laws. Try to keep up with this one. This is the response, quote, secretary tear clinton does not recall being advised cautioned or warned. She does not recall it was ever suggested to her and does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, meeting which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail. Com, email account to conduct official state Department Business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws. I think you might get the point there. Three times in one answer where does not recall is part of the response. Separately, today, as well, there was another wikileaks document dump. Just having to deal with the whole email story is consistent theme in all the releases. One email released this morning shows top clinton aides were planning how to publicly respond to how 15 of clinton email as with sidney blumenthal, clinton confidante, advisor to the Clinton Family were not turned over. The clinton aides were tipped by the state department as timing when information would be released of the. The state department, they say in the email was considering giving the story to a quote, friendly. That is how it was put. Neil, back to you. Neil amazing. Thank you, buddy. Meantime, to chris farrell, judicial you watch director of research on all of this. If i had a dime, every reference, chris, it is worded something to the effect in answering your interrogatories secretary clinton objection to the interrogatory, outside the scope of and variations of that i would have a lot of dimes. Did you glean anything from you that you didnt know before . There are a few things here. First of all, David Kendall is highlypaid, very skilled attorney who would do anything in the world to try to protect the clintons, but most importantly, we got her under oath. No other organization in the country, to include the fbi has ever gotten mrs. Clinton under oath to answer for her email server and for her mishandling of National Defense information. Judicial watch did get her under oath. She is in a very tough spot because her choice is, she is either perjures herself, makes admissions against her own interest or develops this very convenient case of amnesia. She was interviewed bit fbi. She made official statements to them. So she is really boxed in. The only thing left for her as a Yale Law School graduate is to claim this sudden and temporary amnesia. However inconsistently, because in one pores of the responses she does remember that colin powell talked to her about email but then she claims she doesnt remember any other conversations neil did you really expect otherwise . I am no lawyer, but i did talk to number of lawyers, a general foggy out for you, i dont recall, i dont remember, that is about as much as she offers you . Was it worth it to go through all you did, to try to get her under oath to respond, touche to that and for that. Did you get anything approaching something valuable here . Yeah. I mean the valuable thing is, she is now documented as being extraordinarily dishonest. The lesson, the educational point for the American Public is, that she is now been less than forthcoming, all the way up to outright lying under oath to the American Public. Neil she doesnt recall, she doesnt recall, she doesnt recall. It is completely unbelievable and implausible. No one can keep a straight face discussing this sudden case of

© 2025 Vimarsana