Experts were predicting today. Could be a game changer. We will lay out all the case and have exclusive reaction from the person that brought that suit, the Texas Attorney general ken paxton. Also kayleigh mcenany. We begin first tonight, you need to know about this critical new challenge. All you need to know about the mob, the media, they will all dismiss it. A wellwritten case, well thought out, it was well delivered. And apparently received well enough that they want to hear arguments. First and foremost, article three of our u. S. Constitution this is really not complicated. Stay with us. Requires that the case be filed directly at the u. S. Supreme court which has what is called original jurisdiction in disputes between multiple states. If the Supreme Court decides to take up the case, the justices will be tasked with deciding whether or not the states, georgian, wisconsin, michigan, pennsylvania, whether they violated the u. S. Constitution in a variety of ways, that is all laid out right here in this suit brought by texas. It includes article two of our constitution which clearly articulates the following each state shall appoint in such manner as the Legislature Thereof May direct a number of electoh ares. Constitutionally up to state legislatures to the side election policy. For example, in pennsylvania we already know that this was clearly violated when the mail in ballot deadline was pushed back without lawmaker approval. Article two was also likely violated as weve been telling you in the state of georgia with that idiotic consent degree which relax the signature verification requirements and mail in ballots, creating what was an unequal system. This policy was once again done without lawmaker approval. It was a consent agreement but with the secretary state of georgia and constitutionally, as we pointed out, it is the legislature of georgia that should have decided any such thing. Remember, that lawsuit was brought by the Georgia Democratic party, the Senatorial Campaign committee and the Democratic Campaign committees. This was a consent agreement just with the secretary of state, not with the state legislature. That is not all. This new texas suit also alleges multiple violations of what is known as the equal protection clause and relies on very compelling court precedent. Chris goldbach had a great interview with me on radio today, pointed out in a terrific mark added op ed. Bush v gore. One florida county treated ballots one way and another florida county, they treated ballots a whole different way. We saw a clear examples of all of this unequal treatment among counties in state after state. That includes vastly different policies for election observers, poll workers, and county procedures. To michigan for example we know that some of the county is denied access partisan observers which the statutory language calls for and other counties forced observers back at a distance of 6 feet. Others 20 feet away from the vote counting process which prevented them from doing what they were legally allowed to do and, frankly it was written into the law. Other counties decided to allow full access to partisan observers. Ask yourself, how is that unequal application of the law . Make no mistake, this case deserves to be heard. It has merit, it has press event in the American People deserve their day in court. During a present sole election, if laws are violated in one state voters in every other state bill the consequences. That would say maybe this in franchising their honest and legal votes. Thats why according to the suit, a dark cloud hangs over the 2020 president ial election. The new gallup poll, 89 of americans have serious doubts of this election process. Rasmussen, 57 but they did not want the president to concede and today the president called on lawmakers, the Supreme Court, to do what is right. Take a look. Hopefully the next administration will be the Trump Administration because you cannot steal hundreds of thousands of votes. You cant have fraud and deception and all the things that they did and slightly win a swing state and you just have to look at the numbers, look what has been on tape, look at all the corruption and, well, you cant win and election like that. Lets see if someone has the courage, whether its a legislature or legislatures or a justice of the Supreme Court or a number of justices at the Supreme Court, lets see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right. Tonight like always, we will continue our own independent path. We do not follow the mob, the media, any other show. We do our own thing here. This lawsuit from texas is a very serious legal challenge. At the very least it has a right to be heard. The country deserve it, you deserve it. We, the people deserve it. I do not know with the justices are going to do but the American People deserve answers and we need to have confidence in both the integrity and the results of every States Election in the process. Because we have millions of innocent americans in states where the law, the constitution were followed. They are then disenfranchised in a corrupt process. Its not okay that partisan observers were blocked from performing what they were legally allowed in the law calls for them to do. They are critical duties. Its not okay but th the chain f custody gets lost. It is not okay that election laws are changed by politicians at a whim in the middle or after the game has been played without any legislative approval. Its not okay that mail in ballots have different signature verification requirements that an in person ballot. As the texas superficially describes, our country stands at perfect crossroads. Either the constitution matters and must be followed even when some officials consider it inconvenient, out of date, or simply a piece of parchment on display at the national archives. We ask the court to choose the former. In the coming days, the u. S. Supreme court will send an important message. Make no mistake. Whatever happens, this will have serious, longlasting implications, ramifications for every single election to come. And thats why tonight, every decent Republican Attorney general with a brain needs to get busy working on their amicus briefs to support this texas suit. Here with more is the Texas Attorney general ken paxton. First of all, ive got it all right here. I highlighted all of it. Read it cover to cover. Well done. First of all, why you decided to engage in this . Tell us the law and the constitutional principles that are at stake here. First of all you did a fantastic job describing the lawsuit. Its really important to my state that my folders be represented. If other states do not follow the constitution, if there state legislature isnt responsible for overseeing their elections and we have other people who are not under the constitution supposed to be doing this, it affects my state. So our job is to make sure that the constitution is followed and that every vote count. In this case im not sure that every vote was counted. Not in the right way. Lets go to the heart of this. Number one, lets go to the beginning. Article three of the constitution, this is a very small number of categories of cases that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. In other words, this does not have to start at a lower court. Explain that in the context of now they do the response to your suit earlier tonight. Is an important point youre bringing up. In a state on state suit them the only place to go is the u. S. Supreme court. Other lawsuits start at the District Court level and they have a right to be heard at least once, whether they have a good case or bad case. All requested we want to be heard. The only place we can go is the u. S. Supreme court and so we are pleading with the u. S. Supreme court. Please hear our case, give us a chance at least to argue what we think is right. We want to argue the constitution. The Supreme Court has opined in the past that it may decline to accept the case but as we watch all of this unfold today, look, we had a different possible outcome today and that is, you know, we were waiting today to see if the court would or would not hear the case and now we have a briefing schedule. Correct . I really appreciate that the court has asked the other states to respond so we have a chance hopefully after they respond to go to the core and make our arguments on both sides and at least let the Supreme Court make a decision on what is the law in this case. A question that they have never answered as it relates to the facts that we are presenting. Tucker sean this is the point. This is where you go into very specific detail about article two of the constitution and how they violated what we call the elector is because when judicial change the rule of elections or governing elections. That is constitutionally as clear and unambiguous as anything in the constitution, that there is one body that has that Constitutional Authority and that would be the state legislatures. Sean, you make a really important point here. Its the responsibility of state legislatures per the constitution to set the rule for election of elect doors. This was overrated in the four states we are talking about overridden by other officials whether they were other government officials and thats not the way our constitution works and thats the challenge we have in front of the court. Can this be overridden by people who are not responsible on the constitution for doing this . Sean can you explain how the electors cause in michigan and p. A. Were violated . All those cases, they allowed male imbalance in cases they were not supposed to, they allowed for noncitizen verification which is really important. When you request a mailin ballot, you have to sign for that application and they will verify. When you send your ballot in on the sleeve of a ballot, theyll usually verify that signature to ensure those two signatures match. If you waive those requirements you have no way to go back and verify that the person who requested the application, thats a pretty important thing when in pennsylvania you go from 233,000 mail in ballots four years ago to 2. 5 million and the difference in the election was only 81,000. Thats a very important issue to ignore. Sean whats fascinating about this suit is at no point do you even have to go to the area proving fraud which i think was proven in a lot of these states and in those cases they are run independently and a lot of the states we are talking about. But lets talk about the second constitutional violation that you point out in your suit and actually rely on a landmark case of bush v gore where the Supreme Court held that they violated the equal protection clause and the 14th amendment and when one florida county treated ballots one way, chads, swinging, hanging, perforated, old and dimpled, and they did it differently from county to county and voters had the constitutional right to have all ballots in the state of florida equally county to county, explain how that comes into play in this suit. Tucker that explains the wisdom of the constitution, a state wide body of legislature make the rules instead of allowing county by county distinctions in different where people are treated differently in different states and i think that was part of the genius of what the founders put in place is making sure that everybody ie state was at least treated the l four states we have county by county distinctions that treated voters differently and therefore have unreliable results and thats a problem. Sean you also talk about remedy in the lawsuit and you are asking the Supreme Court to remand the appointment of electors in these four states back to the state legislatures and there is even the mcpherson black or case of 1842 that are argue was probably precedentsetting in this regard as well, am i right about that . Youre absolutely right and this was traditional in our country. It was not uncommon for a legislative body to elect and elector. We are saying, look, the results here, we cant put the genie back in the bottle because we do not know how to match up signatures anymore because they were separated from that. Since we cant go back and do that, we want to go back to the legislature and let them make a decision because they were elected by the people of the states. Sean mr. Attorney general, fascinating. Going to be an interesting week to watch and i hope they have the courage. Breaking today, another almost unbelievable development out of upstate new york. You cant make this up. We had a couple of districts in upstate new york that have been problematic and in one congressional race, the republican leads by a whopping 12 votes. Well, another 12 uncounted votes mysteriously appeared yesterday after last week they just mysteriously found 55 other uncounted votes turning up. To join us with an update on all these election irregularities across the country is kayleigh mcenany. Okay. It is over a month and we are still finding votes but only when needed, apparently. Just like, we found thousands in georgia weeks after the electi election. Yeah. Thats right. In multiple locations come you cant make this up in the election you just mentioned, they find 12 ballots. You have to ask questions here. Its quite peculiar. Every ballot should be counted on election day, sean. I want to underscore everything you just said, everything the attorney general just said. That document you have before you, the texas be commonwealth of pennsylvania, this is the single most important document of the 2020 election. Everything you and i discussed over the last few weeks, the case here in pennsylvania, case here in wisconsin, this all combined in us a sink very well sourced footnoted document or you have Supreme Court barred attorneys going before the Supreme Court saying these are the facts. These are the truths. We separated fact from fiction and here it is. I encourage everyone to read this document. It is big. Sean i pointed out how strong i thought the pennsylvania case was because the state legislature literally bypassed their own state constitution and had very specific language in it as it relates to mail in ballots. And the limits they put on it and the court said no, they arent taking it. The fact this was taken up tells us what . The fact it was taken up tells us the Supreme Court could be taking a very hard look at this. As this case says, either the constitution matters or its just a piece of parchment in the national archives. One thing though, sean, really interesting in this case, i encourage everyone to read this paragraph, we know there is a mass influx of mail in ballots. In georgia, 94 increase in mail in ballots. Youd expect the rejection rate to be higher this time around then in 2016 with all these new voters. But instead of being higher, it was 70 times lower and the Statistical Analysis done here in this case by an expert shows that if you had the same rejection rate as in 2016 in georgia, we expected to be higher. But if you just had the same, that would be a net gain of 25,587 votes for President Trump, more than doubled the margin hed need in georgia. A concise history of how democrats change the laws, eliminated safeguards, mass mail out ballots to change the system in the mass mail in experiment. Sean im having a hard time getting over that he got 15 million votes more than barack obama. I dont know. Im kind of suspicious. Im suspicious he got 15 million more votes than hilary too. I dont know. Couldnt get a thousand people for his virtual thanksgiving message to sign up. Nobody on the campaign trail would go to any event that he did. And of course, in every major city except for atlanta, milwaukee, detroit, philadelphia and out in nevada, oh, it seems that joe biden underperformed with minority voters, but over performed in these very, well, how communally happening cities i just mentioned. Thats right. You are pointing out the anomalies that happened in these elections. What this lawsuit does is it looks at those at those anomalies in the heres what it finds. It finds that the chances of biden coming from as far behind as he was at 3 00 a. M. On election night, the chances of that are one in one Claude Julien. The chances of him prevailing in all four states he was so far behind him the are that are one and a quadrille into the fourth power. This is all outlined right here in this lawsuit, everything weve discussed in a source document by attorneys before the United StatesSupreme Court. Sean people want to know what a quadrille you and is . God forbid, its biden, aoc, bolshevik bernie, kamala, you will learn more about the word Claude Julien in debt by the time they are done with their giveaways, free everything. Going to watch is very closely. You are right. We both have a copy of right here, right in front of the camera in front of us is pivotal. This is now a key moment and a key time. Thank you, kayleigh. We have more on team trump spike to have every legal vote count counted. Also a new investigation. New information. Hunter bidens conflict of interest in how they compromise national security, how they represented an extortion threat and why special counsel is needed. Weve been doing the story since 2018 and the mob, of course, put biden in the candidate protection program. We will not be silenced. Ken buck will join us, the congressman, and jim jordan straight ahead. One that could mean. A chance to live longer. Opdivo plus yervoy is for adults newly diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer that has spread and that tests positive for pdl1 and does not have an abnormal egfr or alk gene. Its the first and only approved chemofree combination of two immunotherapies that works together in different ways to harness the power of the immune system. Opdivo plus yervoy equals a chance for more days. More nights. More beautiful weekends. More ugly sweaters. More big hugs. More small outings. Opdivo and yervoy can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. This may happen during or a