Is. Again, this is playing out in st. Petersburg, russia, where the Antiterrorism Committee is fully engaged. They are calling it terrorism very early on. And as we get more information on what is happening along the sublime lane so by line in st. Petersburg, we will bring it to you. Another fox news alert, the senate could be on the verge of going nuclear. The Judiciary Committee is said to hold a vote on judge neil gorsuch. And is expected along party lines to send his nomination to the senate floor. This is democrats appear to have the votes to maintain a filibuster. It is about to get really, really interesting. This is about to be outnumbered. I am harris faulkner, sandra smith, Meghan Mccain, trish regan coming and todays oneluckyguy. Welcome for the first time. He looked so happy. Democratic strategists, and a syndicated radio host, i like to listen to him myself a bit. Richard fowler. He likes to fight, but he is awfully friendly. Good to have you. You wore a flower. I dated. You have to. It is void. Oh, is it really . From fashion to politics. Lets go on the news now. Of the senate Judiciary Committee is getting set to make a crucial vote on judge gorsuchs nomination. The democrats appear to have enough votes to maintain a filibuster. This is after their ranking democrat Dianne Feinstein along with mark warner and Patrick Lahey say that they will oppose President Trumps choice to the nations highest court. That means that there are enough democrats to block a vote by the full senate. Republicans could deploy the socalled nuclear option. I mentioned on top of the show. If they can change the president to conform gorsuch with a simple majority vote. The leader of the senate says there is no way that he will reach 60 votes. He is urging republicans to go back to the drawing board. It looks like gorsuch will not reach the 60 vote margin. When a nominee does not get 60 votes coming you should not change the rules. You should change the nominee. Our republican friends are acting like they are a cat on a top of a tree and they have to jump off. Come back off the tree, sit down and work with us. We will produce a mainstream nominee. Cats and trees, a real dogfight. Meanwhile, Senate Majority leader Mitch Mcconnell says that a vote on gorsuch will happen this week. And what happens next will be up to the democrats. Watch. Will there be a confirmation vote by friday . Yes, we are going to confirm gorsuch this week. Exactly how that happens, chris, that will be up to our democratic colleagues. I think it is noteworthy to note that no Supreme Court justice has ever in the history of our country been stopped by a partisan filibuster. Mike emanuel joins us now from capitol hill. Its always good to see you. Thank you, afternoon to you. With 52 republicans, they needed at least you democrats to stop the filibuster. With more democrats going against judge gorsuch this morning. It appears that we are headed for a change in senate rules but we will take you live inside the senate Judiciary Committee room where we are hearing senators talk for and against the gorsuch nomination. Praising the nominations to serve on the Supreme Court. This nominee that we are voting on today is a judges judge. He is a picture of the kind of justice that we should have on the Supreme Court. So i urge you to join me in supporting his nomination. Much of the democratic opposition is due to the fact that tamir garland who was nominated by president obama never received nomination last year. It has hired out sides on the left and the liberal base. If you have been critical of judge gorsuch citing other reasons. Unfortunately, based on judge gorsuchs record at the department of justice, his tenure on the bench, his appearance before the senate, and his written questions for the record i cannot support this nomination. Democratic senator Michael Bennet came out of a short time ago and reported that he would oppose the filibuster, but also called on his colleagues tend not to use the nuclear option. He was in a very tricky spot being a home state senator of judge gorsuch who introduced him at the confirmation hearing. But also under intense pressure from democratic outside groups to oppose the nomination. Well, we will watch it all along with your help. Thank you very much, good to see you. We bring it back out to the couch now. So richard, you and i were just talking as mike was reporting that there are several couple surprises. I think the two surprises are bennetts, and esther, he is from a red state where donald trump one, saying that he will join the filibuster. This is a very interesting. Because we have a special election happening in montana and the next of weeks for the seat that was once Donald Trumps interior secretary. That is a statewide race. If they are trying to pick up the congressional seat. This is an interesting move. Chuck schumer does not seem to be doing what he said he was going to do witches work with republicans. He said that once or twice last week. I cant remember if it was obamacare, probably not. But he has been saying this. So is he disingenuous as he is answering them . That is a peer point. He said that he will try. I dont think that we are saying much. Dont you have to try to try . Yes, you do. If this was a moral obligation, they kind of hinted at that. And the senator from california hinted about that coming into they are still mad over the garland retreat. And you can blame republicans for not moving on that front, and maybe that was unfair. But here we are. You have a full term presidency ahead of you. You need a Supreme Court justice there. By every account he really is considered fairly qualified for the job. And i will tell you, harris, americans do not like it when washington starts to get in the way and does not allow things to get done. I think its going to backfire politically. At some point to leadership in your party, richard fowler, has to ask themselves if what we are doing is good for the American People . Let me share with you the words of a democrat in a republican dominated state who is up for reelection next year. If joe donnelly of indiana, he said that he would support the president s nominee. He is a qualified jurist who will based his decisions on his understanding of the law and is well respected among his peers. What we are seeing from the leadership in your party, who is this helping . Well, heres the thing. Where the democrats are right now, there are a lot of democrats that are really upset about the elect oriole. And there is a huge base of people who are committed to opposing donald trump. These are the people that are moving the party and saying, hey, listen, we cannot have a judge like gorsuch, and because of how Merrick Garland was treated, why should we treat their republicans any different . President obama to use obamas nominee did not even get a hearing. Take poor attack . There are a lot of democrats angry about the results. We are going to stop a qualified man with an amazing history, who has bipartisan support in 2006. It is a really, really bad deal. Because they are going to need the capital when there is another Supreme Court seat to settle. I agree there. I think also, you cannot look at this in a vacuum. Lets think about the other side of pennsylvania avenue, the white house. If the white house wanted to work with the democrats, they couldve done that. I dont think that health care was the first move. We are not talking about health care, we are talking about gorsuch right now. You are demonizing the legacy of a completely qualified person by all standards including bipartisan lives. You are tearing him apart and demonizing him simply for being conservative and simply for being held up under the Trump Administration. It is exhausting. This is why congress i dont want to talk about this anymore he is going to get confirmed one way or the other there are people that have a problem with them. Blumenthal said the following wing. I find his nomination to be problematic because he does not agree on brown versus the board of education. That is a logical reason to vote against him. Lets not breath tacked politics. He is going to get one way or another. You are wasting your anger and terrifies on something that is that you are going to lose. So the logic here, if im a democrat, this is a losing battle, i dont want to die on this mountain. Lets wait till the next one, lets wait till health care. Lets wait till something that we have a chance of seeing through. President obamas acting felicity or general sad that this was the man for the job. We have talked on this network. And i have seen other apps as well. Former clerks who have worked for neil gorsuch who stated the same thing. This is the man for the job. Yes, he is replacing another conservative on the courts. Judge scalia who has passed, but also he is bringing with it the conviction of seeing incorporated case through based on its merit. He likes to look at the facts. Time and time again we are seeing that thing. Dianne feinstein made up her mind. She is not voting for him. She did not get her questions answered. I was watching the hearing. That is fine. That is her opinion. 40 or so democrats who have their opinions. But the fact is that those opinions are balanced by stingy facts. Immovable facts. He does his job well. I think it is up you vote based on your constituents. And when your constituents are blowing up your phone, you see mark warner with a constituent saying you need to vote. That is good for the American Public . It is good for his constituents. Why would they call them if not . I think collectively of the American Public at collectively the American Public is not represented by donald trump. You do not speak of him, number one. I think you might be offended that his interest for the collective. Buds when calling your phone time saying, i dont want neil gorsuch coming you go to no on neil gorsuch. It is that simple. Its the same thing with the health care debate, did you vote no . A lot of people did. You have heard schumer and other people saying come up with a name, who is this person . They have a very strong, very mollified connected to the point youve made. Another name could be a whole lot worse. They might want to look as the glasses glass is halffull here, and i fully agree, i do not think that this is any favor with democrats or republicans. The entire country wants to move forward. They are standing in the way of that. And it will backfire. Okay, we will move on. Richard, welcome to the couch. Happy to be here. The Ranking Member of the Committee Launching an explosive annexation against the white house into the russias election meddling. Of those claims, if they are true are all about politics. So much is. We will see. Plus President Trumps has no plan to replace it and repeal obamacare is not dead. What and who it will take to get the job done. More people after the tv version wraps up, we will go online. Foxnews. Com outnumbered. Thats for the gloves come all. Facebook. Com outnumberedfnc for facebook live. We cannot wait. And in the meantime, we will take out our phones. Of tweet, tweet, little bertie. We are coming back ive tried enough laxatives to cover the eastern seaboard. Ive climbed a Mount Everest of fiber. Probiotics . Enough avo if youve had enough, tell your doctor what youve tried and how long youve been at it. Linzess works differently from laxatives. Linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. It can help relieve your belly pain, and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements that are easier to pass. Do not give linzess to children under six, and it should not be given to children six to less than eighteen. It may harm them. Dont take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. Get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. The most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. If its severe stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. Other side effects include gas, stomacharea pain and swelling. Talk to your doctor about managing your symptoms proactively with linzess. And we come to you with the fox news alert. Happening now inside the oval office. To the first pictures as the president of egypt, Abdel Fattah Elsisi is here meeting with President Trump in the oval office. Sometimes he will get a little bit of a audio. Yep, lets watch and listen. I will tell you that president Abdel Fattah Elsisi has been somebody very close to me since the first time i met him. I met him during the campaign. And at that point there were two up us. And we both match. Hopefully he likes me a lot mor more. But it was a very long, it was supposed to be just a quick, brief meeting, and we were with each other for a long period of time. We agree on so many things. I just want to let everybody know in case there was any doubt that we are very much behind president elsisi. He has done a fantastic job in a difficult situation. We are very much behind egypt and the people of egypt. The and the United States has back in, and we have strong backing. We are very much coming out as you and i will soon be talking, we are building up our military to a level that will be the highest, probably the highest that we have ever had. Plane orders, ship orders, we are rejuvenating our military to the highest level. I think in these times, probably more than ever before. Or certainly more than almost ever before. This is what we need. And i just want to say to you, mr. President , you have a great friend and ally in the United States and in me. Thank you very much. [speaking foreign language] your excellency, let me extend my thanks and appreciation for your kind invitation for me to visit the United States. This is my first visit to the United States since my immigration inauguration in office. The first visit in eight years from a president. [speaking foreign language] your excellency, since we meant to last september, i have had a deep appreciation and admiration of you and your unique personality. Especially as you are standing very strong. To counter this evil ideology that is claiming anything that you are bringing devastation to communities, and that is terrorizing the innocent people. Your excellency, very strongly and very openly, you will find egypt and myself always beside you in bringing about an effective strategy in the counterterrorism act. [speaking foreign language] the second point, your excellency, you will find me supporting you very strongly. And very earnestly. We will find solution to the problem of the century. And im quite confident that you will be able to bring a solution to this issue. We will. That i can tell you. We will. Thank you. We will do that together. We will fight terrorism our President Trump. So the back and forth between our President Trump and the president of egypt, elsisi. You saw a little bit of translation. And the ties became rather strained in 2013, you saw the man who was sitting there eating in opposition and an overthrow of his predecessor in military fashion to put himself in office. President trump has said that he is seeking to reboot the ties with egypt. You saw through the translation that mr. Elsisi singh since he meant to last september, he strongly supports President Trump and his unique personality, thats how he put it. Those men a meeting inside the oval office right now. We will report on that as it is made. Accusations that both the Trump Administration and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee are trying to create a distraction from the probe into russia and the meddling in the u. S. President ial election. This coming from the ranking democrats on the house committe committee, congressman adam schiff. It is an attempt to distract the materials. The question is of course why. And i think to answer the question, is the effort to point to the congress and other directions . Basically say, dont look at me. Do not to look into russia. There is nothing to see here. In the meantime President Trump tweeting that the real story is leaking. Find the leakers. So i want to start with you, trish. The more that i know about the story, the less that i understand it. Thats whats so frustrating. It is highly confusing, there is not a lot of information out there. There is a lot of innuendo, there are a lot of people saying this, that, and the other. But we are left to sing, well, what do we believe . We do not have a whole lot to go on. So i think that donald trump tweeting something out like this talking about his concerns over whether or not himself and members of his team were spied upon with surveillance, that is a fair sort of twist that he is trying to put forward. There is a lot of innuendo on the other side. Now he is shining the light on some innuendo on his side. What you heard multiple times coming from the white house last week, including sean spicer. He kept telling the media, you are obsessed with the process rather than the substance. And here the president is doing a fairly good job of driving the conversation back to the leakers and the substance of the story. It did feel like the media got really lost. This is mock, is the best way to put dad. Im glad you said that. I think what he said, yes, the russians into her if you have all of these pieces. Here is the solution. A select committee, the fbi investigator should report. And this committee, almost like the 9 11 commission, sit down, go through all of the evidence. Figure out what happened prior to the house has no credibili