President ial campaign. But first, trump exposes the fanatics is the focus of tonights angle. The president s visit to davos was by any measure a smashing success. He engaged World Leaders on the sidelines and he delivered a speech that was disciplined, serious and unapologetic. I will always put America First just like the leaders of other countries should put their Country First also. But America First does not mean america alone. Laura the president delivered a calmed and righthand defense of economic nationalism at the same time showing respect to our international allies. Despite how well the president performed, the media will never give him a fair shake. Its pathetic. Heres what some of them thought of the davos speech. Its like a tone to the more measured i guess, whats the word, sedated. If content was a victory lap i thought hed fall asleep. I was struck by the lack of verve. Id never seem him more low energy. Laura well, had the president been really animated, they would have said, hes yelling, hes shouting, he looks angry. The ugly american. He sounds like old ducce. They said hes unhinged, hes illsuited for the presidency and remember, even before inauguration day, they insisted his arrogant tone and populist policies would destroy him and the planet. And they portray him 24 7 as a dictator in waiting and a fan fanatic who demands loyalty and now we see the true fanatics. The media. The breaking news and military dicta dictatorship. The impulses of a tyrant and dictator. He attacks the news institutions which is what franco and mussolini and others did. The kind of strategy dictators and tyrants have used. Hes attacking the press he calls them the enemy people which is rhetoric you hear from stallin. Laura killed 50 Million People but its the same as trump. Oh, my gosh. These people are slavish adherence to a world view that is elitist and theyre addicted to policy are frankly growing more unpopular around the world as the days, weeks and months go on. I say this, very few of them have the professionalism to step back for just a minute and absorb the positive news the Trump Presidency has created for america. Now, aside from the rare abc headline, like, why arent more news organizations heralding the news on jobs, income growth, soaring consumer confidence, the good news for African American and latino americans . Because its against their world view. Imagine if the opposite had occurred. If trump had presided over an economic downturn. They would have said, we told you. Trump is going to destroy the world. Statement pundits would have pounced on his conservative populism and blamed trump for the derailment of the obama recovery. Its so transparent. No wonder the medias approval and ratings keep falling. Ill tell you this, the media arent the only rabid fanatics trump and his agenda have exposed. Just look at the reaction over the past 24 hours to the president S Immigration reform and daca plan. Now last week, remember, he was set to offer 800,000 Daca Recipients amnesty in exchange for Border Security and end of chain immigration and visa lottery. The democrats rejected that deal and shut down the government. So this week, after work a broad work of senators, the president has livened the amnesty pool to 1. 8 million immigrants. Thats a million jump. This has agitated the president s baste quite a bit. Their opinions were expressed on my radio show today and they were overwhelmingly critical. If trump goes through with this he can lose my vote in 2020. If he does that hes committing political suicide. Not only will he demoralize his base, hell kill the Republican Party. If he continues to pursue this, hes clearly lost me as a voter. I dont see the difference between him and obama. I did not go for trump for him to do this and i will not vote for him again if he does that. Do you notice there were a number of hispanic voters in that montage we put together. Fascinating. Everyone knows this is not the plan i was hoping for and not the one i think republicans in the senate should agree to. Whats happening is the president is taking this risky gamut in a way to get common sense immigration controls in place. What hes thinking, i believe, is that we have to end this massive influx of immigrants into the United States who are admitted without regard for need or merit, what theyll bring to the country. And we also must stop the wave of humanity, Illegal Immigrants, busting across our southern border every year only to stay for however long they want. Now, like it or not, as the administrations thought process. Well see how it works out. The republicans dont have the vote in the center for the bill, which i believe is much better, its ridiculous the senates not embracing that. The president moved to the middle. Not where id be but thats where hes at. When he did that he enraged his supporters and perhaps risked his own reelection. He did all that and what are the democrats saying in reaction . Let the just say what i said last night, that plan is a campaign to make America White again. If you start putting in all these highly charged toxic issues, its just not going to work. Laura i dont even know what that comment meant but these people are total fanatic. Theyre fanatical for open borders and endless migration of lowskill labor for political purpose and we havent even told you what Chuck Schumer said yet. As we said earlier this week, democrats believe they have to repeal and replace the american el electorate and nancy and schumer etcetera, have to keep their Grievance Society going and otherwise what are they going to say . The economys thriving. Theyre out of ideas. Theyre out of the ideas business. All they believe in is division, identity politics, the blame game and calling trump a dictator. Thats all they have. And if the immigration view they have if it means lowering the standard of living for the average working person, citizen, by adding in lowskilled workers, so about it. If for the democrats fit means resisting if it means resisting trump when it benefits voters, so be it. Im telling you, these people are dangerous fanatics and it is they, not President Trump, who end up destabilizing Destructive Forces in the body of politics. Hes exposed them like no one has before. And thats the angle. Well, well talk to congressman steve king in a moment and hes well known for his, well, hardline stances on immigration. He believes in what trump campaigned on which is got to build a wall. You have to end chain immigration. You have to end immigration just on family ties and meritbased and has to be great for American People and we have humanitarian concern for people truly in need. Weve always been welcoming to those people but it also has to be done with an eye towards common sense. Refugees who come in the country who would not meld with the american understanding or appreciate our views on nondiscrimination and so forth. That would not work. Congressman king supported the president precisely because of hiS Immigration views along with other issues. And joining us now without further ado is congressman steve king and were delighted hes joining us from iowa, i believe. Congress, how are you doing . Doing fine right in my living room. Its terrific. I appreciate your monologue. Sean lets talk about the president s plan. The four pillars were announced late yesterday. Its a change from a week ago where it was 800,000 Daca Recipients would have a pathway, eventually, to citizenship and moved on to 1. Million 1. 8 million basically in place and more for the border and security which is good stuff and the visa lottery system would be kind of replaced used the 50,000 to end the family and meritbased backlog of Illegal Immigrants who have been applying and waiting for years and years. Tell us what your biggest concern is with this and could you ever support an amnesty that would lead to a reduction in Legal Immigration . I haventstein i havent seen the plan but i do recognize the value of the go goodlatte bill but the numbers are stunning that President Trump proposed 1. 8 million amnesty to illegals. Im familiar with the immigration policy. I said the policy has been in iowa 14 years and thats why hes president of the United States today. I think this will demoralize so many of his supporters. He had a mandate to end daca. A mandate for a wall and to end chine migration and to end the visa lottery. We can go on and on. And theyre matched up negotiations and its troubling to me. I think seeing the democrats turn against it. The one thing hes accomplishing is convincing the American People of the real truth which is democrats dont care about solving the problem. They want the problem to exploit it politically and to bring more and more people into the United States tab on their side of the political ledger. Laura i do think he has exposed them. Its not the plan i would want. Im good for the goodlatte bill. I should show what mercedes sclap said i want to hear from the white house. Id like to interview the president on this and obviously he just came back tonight. We hope to have someone on on monday. Lets listen to what mercedes said earlier from the white house today. Clearly it needs to be a bipartisan bill. If we could clearly have a 60 votes with republicans that would support this it would be easier. The congress is not in that position. Thats why you need a compromise on immigration and from the standpoint of the white house its clear the president has said time and time again, there needs to be a wall. If theres no wall, theres no daca. Sean congressman, your response. The goodlatte bill would be dead on arrival and not pass. What do you say . No wall, no deal. The reason we need the wall is the walls dont have prosecutorial discretion. Laura you get the wall and deal and end chine chain migration. Thats 400,000 people a year. In five years youd have more than 1. 8 million amnesty of new familybased immigration thats gone. In five years youd swap the 1. 8 number and exceed it and the cuts would still keep coming. I dont see youll get a cut in legal family chain migration. I dont see it. Laura, heres what this establishes, though, if the president served up 1. 8 million in amnesty in change for 25 million for a wall and then reduces the numbers of the chine migration thats the end of his enforcement in his administration unless we come up with another amnesty to serve it up because hell have established that precedent. By the way, this is the success of the sacrifice of the rule of law. Well never see the rule of law restored again. In 1986 this mistake was made by ronald reagan. Its the same debate. It hasnt changed. Laura rule of law has to be respected, agree with you on that. Were almost out of time. This is what some of the Laura Ingraham of leftwing leftwing advocates said. The white house released a hatef hatef hateful zono phobic proposal. And united we dream said lets call the proposal what it is a white supremacist ransom note. Come on, the left is so over the top in response. My listers cant believe what theyre hearing but the practical information of all this is you dont have 60 steve kings in a sentence. Voting for cloture on immigration proposal. I wish we had more people that believed in the rule of law. I looked around a week ago and had a hard time finding anybody and now the coalitions growing. Thank you for doing this tonight. I appreciate it. Laura we appreciate it, by the way, congressman, we could be on the verge of a stunning game changer in the russian investigation. Our panel of experts will tell you what to expect. Do not touch that dial. To everyone else, i look like everyone else. But on the inside, i feel chronic, widespread pain. Fibromyalgia may be invisible to others, but my pain is real. Fibromyalgia is thought to be caused by overactive nerves. Lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. Im glad my doctor prescribed lyrica. For some, lyrica delivers effective relief for moderate to even severe fibromyalgia pain. And improves function. Lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions, suicidal thoughts or actions. Tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. Common side effects dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs and feet. Dont drink alcohol while taking lyrica. Dont drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. Those whove had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. With less pain, i can do more with my family talk to your doctor today. See if lyrica can help. Well fok. Im. Ok . You dont always use your smartphone to read the latest posting. Aw, a girl lost her dog. Oh hey. Wait a minute. You dont always use your smartphone to friend someone. Hi. I think i found your dog. But when it matters most, you count on tracfone to keep you connected, for less. Murphy dog barking aww. Smartphone plans with talk, text and data start at 15 month, no contract. All with unlimited carryover. And nationwide 4g lte coverage. Tracfone. For moments that matter. Republicans who read it say it suggests serious surveillance abuses by top officials at the fbi and department of justice and president would have to approve the release. Lets bring in a member of the house judiciary committee. Great to see you. Starting with you, congressman gates. I talked to one of your colleagues earlier and he said the following, a republican a senior house member, he said id be careful in the hyping the content of this memo. He said, i think some of my colleagues are over selling whats in it. This is not the smoking gun thats going stop the Mueller Investigation. I think theyre building up peoples expectations to a ridiculously high extent. I heard that and this is someone i really respect and it made me nervous. Congressman. I would say the memo has to be evaluated in the context of all the other stunning information we learn from Andrew Mccabes message on a prohilary bias and the Text Messages between lisa page and peter strzok and i think yes the memo in and of itself, doesnt the full foreee. The Mueller Probe is rotten to the foundation. Laura the democrats have tried to push off the dossier to the side and it looks like it was used multiple times to justify if he surveillance. Whats the public need to understand. People hear dossier and think its too much for me to comprehend. What on a friday night can we tell the viewing public why that particular issue is so important. It has been reported it was used and hopefully this memo will confirm whether or not thats true. Heres why this matters, if thats indeed in the memo, laura, that of itself is a modernday political scandal thats nearly unrival. Youre saying there was a Campaign Document paid for and produced by one president ial campaign and the fbi used it for justifying spy ong a political campaign. This in itself is a terrifying idea. You see people who keep moving the goal post in this as what counts as shocking or scandalous. It needs to be viewed bad in it of itself if thats the case. Laura lets talk with the morale of the fbi. The democrats are usually big critic of Law Enforcement especially on the state level saying the scrutiny of the fbi and the relentless scrutiny will damage retention and shake the publics trust. Your view on that . Those things are stated to further their own cause. The fine men and women of the fbi will go on doing their job day after day in a superior manner. Their badges are not tarnished by the actions of somebody else. Their badges are as shiny as ever. The only tarnished badgers are the people who performed in a horrible manner if thats provable. The predication for the fisa warrant is atrocious. It puts in jeopardy future fisa warrants going before fisa judges in court. Laura it makes it seem political. This is supposed to be an Agency Getting to the truth if we st t starting the fbi for a political hit job, thats i lived in the soviet union and thats what they did there. They call President Trump a dictator. I find this closer to policestate tactics than anything theyve accused him of and congressman, i want to go back to you on this. The fact we still have agents working and investigators, lawyers work in this investigation with such clear at least the appearance of a conflict and conflict of interest appearance of partisanship and animus towards the president is stunning whether its Andrew Weissmann or any of these other people, theyre still in the investigation. Thats amazing. One of the things i can say about the intelligence memo is names are named. Well see who is engaged in conduct thats shocked me and so many in congress. The result in this should be Bipartisan Legislation to actually reform these processes so you dont have these folks sticking around after bad acts. Have you more oversight, more transparency and then we can restore confidence in the fbi and department of justice. We dont enjoy beating up on the entities essential to preserve our democracy. We just want to see them work for the American People not for the political interests. Laura and kimberly, the move to focus on whether trump was itching to fire muller or said something and whether he was frustrated and i think the white house is maybe defeating that. Its unclear. The president s back from switzerland now. To me that doesnt surprise me. If the president truly feels its an unjust investigation and the investigators were work on it were biassed or clinton or obama loyalists id be frustrated too. Theres no crime in asking questions too. In