More. Congressman, welcome. Thank you for having me back on. I want to ask you something that happened this week about donald trump, the president , of course, tweeting that perhaps u. C. Berkeley should lose its funding as a result of of the protests and cancelation of a right wing speaker. Hes threatened funding for sanctuary cities such as san jose and San Francisco. As a member of the Budget Committee, is that just bluster to you, or how seriously do you take it . I certainly dont think my republican colleagues would go along with that type of intimidation. There are many people who believe in the first amendment. Im hopeful that on the Budget Committee i will be able to convince republicans and democrats not to do that. Of course i disagree with that. Any of the president s tweets, that type of intimidation messages. On the other hand, theres a possible funding hit on obamacare, the Affordable Care act. The republicans have talked about repealing that. California gets about 15 billion a year just for from health care for our expansion of health care here in california. What about that . How worried should california be . We should be very worried. That is a real challenge, and there are those who want i argued for singlepayer health care. We cant repeal this without a plan for replacement. I grilled one of the witnesses on the Budget Committee. She admitted that she thought trumps plan was inadequate as recent recently as april of last year. We have to keep making the point that they have no replacement plan. Is there a sense or concern on your part that california is setting itself up as the Resistance Movement with jerry brown and the new attorney general . Are you concerned that we could be putting ourselves in the cross hairs . Im not. I think that california is doing something that is principle to our values. That said, i dont think that is a sufficient strategy. And my belief is we need to have an affirmative agenda, a positive version, and understand that this election was not just about donald trump. This election was about a lot of people who felt not included in our economy. I have argued that we need to be creating tech jobs, not just in my district but across america. We need a Democratic Party to have a much more economically populist message. We need to get off of reliance of p. A. T. H. Money. I hope we will use this election for some introspection and have a positive agenda to win people and not just be only with this. There are many who feel that the Tech Industry which, of course, your district very much represents, is part of a problem in the sense that there is technology and automation and driverless cars. All this technology that is threatening the jobs of the very voters who were so turned off by Hillary Clinton apparently, the voters in michigan and pennsylvania, wisconsin. What are your thoughts about that . I think we have to talk specifically. So i am visiting appalachia in kentucky. And theres a program there funded by the appalachian economic Regional Commission where they are educating and preparing coal miners kids and others on ios software for the iphone, Android Software for google, where in four months people are getting jobs. 40, 50 jobs. Tech companies have to do a better job of creating jobs in ohio, in michigan, and wisconsin, and making the case that you shouldnt spear technology, that technology can create opportunity. It the wakeup call for our district and Silicon Valley that we need to do a better job in creating these Economic Opportunities across the country and telling the story of how technology can help middleclass lives. Congressman, weve seen a lot of protests across the country here in california included, of course, over the executive orders regarding refugees and immigration in general. What are your thoughts with about that as the son of immigrants . What concerns you most about these policies . Im concerned im concerned as a bicentennial baby in philadelphia, born in philadelphia. Someone who reveres our constitution. What makes america extraordinary is that we dont have an ethnic or religious test in how we judge people. And what concerns me about the orders is that that they impose those types of tests, we need to recognize that our comparative advantage in the world is that we have folks here, the best and brightest, regardless of their ethnicity or religion. All right. Freshman and rookie congressman ro khanna, thank you very much for talking to us. Thank you for having me back on. Earlier this week, googles cofounder spoke to employees at Silicon Valley as they reacted to President Trumps executive order on immigration. Googles response was one of many from highTech Companies. Joining me are cara swisher, founder of the online tech journalism site rikoc, and head of kqeds desk. Care ayou broke the story this week, several Silicon Valley companies banding together to oppose President Trumps travel ban. Which companies are involved, and what exactly are they doing . Well, theres a lot of things going on. I think it started friday when the order came out. I think they were caught unawares. These companies had gone to see trump, it the heads, if you remember a couple of weeks ago. And they were acquiescent. They made no statements. These are people who never dont make statements. They didnt they sort of skulked in and out. I think they were hoping they dwoo wouldnt do stuff like this. They talked about how the meeting was important in Silicon Valley, and he did exactly what he said he would do on the campaign trail which is create a ban. That shouldnt surprise them, though trump is doing what he said he would do when he was campaigning. Yes, thats what i pointed out in the articles. At the time i wrote a tough article called them sheple, i felt like, arent you listening to what hes saying . Theres a famous maya angelou quote, when someone shows you who they are the first time, believe them. He said it a lot. And they thought that he would not do quite the same thing, that it was all bluster. So they were surprised. They started to act on friday after the immigration ban came out. So what is at stake for them . The companies that are the seven nations that are named in this including iraq, iran, syria, yemen, those arent the countries where a huge portion of Foreign Workers come from. They do theres more impacted they come more from other countries. What is at stake beyond the seven nations . The larger principle of immigration is critical to innovation, period. Its the core, the heart of this country. Like how we grew as a country. And that immigrants are welcome. And i think in Silicon Valley you look at sergei, hes a refugee from russia. A refugee. Hes not an emigrant, hes a refugee. You have steve jobs father, syrian immigrant. You have the ceo of google, the search part of the business, immigrant. Yeah. Head of microsoft, immigrant. It goes on and on and on. And all these not just because they are, its because everyone believes in the idea that, you know, immigration is a good thing for innovation, and it is. And that flows into the issue of the visa, as well. A lot of workers come from other countries. Right. I think whats interesting is like what was that thing they said about trump . His followers dont take him literally, they take him seriously. Yeah, in terms of this ban i was looking at the numbers that the professor from howard crunched. There are not that many people from the seven countries that are, you know, i think googles email had said there was like 187 employees that were affected. I think its like in terms of taking it seriously as as antiimmigration stance and where does this stop. And obviously the work force in Silicon Valley is very immigrant heavy, Foreign Workers. I think its spreading a general fear amongst some of the swoe s workers. I was at a mosque in santa clara. A lot of tech workers there. They were feeling like for the first time theyre hearing from people abroad, you know, obviously Silicon Valley still the capitol of tech. Maybe we wont come this year. Maybe well wait a couple of years. So it seems important for these companies, they were heartened as they came out strong, even though these people werent from those countries. They were muslim, and they feel under attack. And so whats next . There are now reports of a draft order targeting h1b visas. Does that pose a bigger threat . Theres something tech wants from trump less regulation. They want their money back, repatriated income, billions and trillions of dollars trapped abroad. They want lower taxes. Those are their business concerns. But theres other things that will be happening. One is the hb1 visas. What are the rules, are they good for Silicon Valley, good for immigration . Second one is things like gay rights. I know it sounds sideways, but Silicon Valley has been strong, you know, remember in indiana and North CarolinaSilicon Valley leaders were the first people to speak out on ridiculous laws. Theyll have clashes over and over and encryption visas encryption, everything. Most of what Silicon Valley stands for, their core values of their companies, beyond shareholder value, its not whats happening in these executive orders. And so were starting to see some backlash, right . The yesterday ubers ceo stepped down from the president s Economic Advisory board. Teslas elon musk is on it. Do you think he will feel pressure to resign . You should see social media. Its i feel bad in a lot of ways for elon, kind of the attack do you think he will step down as a result . He had a different attitude. And he was going to confront the issue. Travis was like, im not having one more picture with trump. The delete uber didnt help. T i think his employees were horrified he was on the council. He said, im not going. Elon prefers to meet and see if he can change minds. I think which one decides which will one of the producers pointed out during the Obama Administration all these Economic Council meetings were in public records. So he was sort of i think its interesting, like would it be more powerful for someone like elon musk or travis calanek to go into the meetings and publicly on the record, you know, go confront the president about these sort of issues . So i dont know i guess theres a little bit of a debate, is it better to bow out or make more of a public stand, you know, when you have an audience . What are the risks to Silicon Valley, to taking these types of public stands . The president , it looks like he his Arnold Schwarzenegger looks like in full battle, a ridiculous thing. He retaliates on twitter and other places. They could do things. Elons got a lot of space and car regulatory issues that are important to the company. So everybody you know, travis has got car regulatory things around selfdriving cars, so does google. All kinds of things. The question is, is this administration going to attack the one industry that is creating jobs and probably at the center of innovation, is that really a policy that, you know, just for retaliation because they disagree . You know, a poll shows that nearly half of the country do support the immigration ban. Are there are there Tech Companies or prominent Silicon Valley figures who support the immigration ban . No, not that i know of. I think there are reasonable debates to be had about immigration policies on reasonable minds can disagree. I think all the news, information thats been coming out about this, theres Rudy Giuliani coming out saying that trump had asked him to find a way to do the muslim ban legally, and this was the consequence of it. So i think this doesnt really fall into the idea of like can we have immigration reform, are there might be different sides to this. It sort of feels very much from the workers standpoint, the folks im speaking to, that its a discriminatory, closeminded employees Silicon Valley has to think of its employees. This is the key to Silicon Valley is talent. And they there are core values of the company and talent values and shareholder values. Youve got to balance them out. I think probably on a lot of these things theyve got to come down hard on open borders. They just have to. And so do you think that this will affect the talent who are willing to come to Silicon Valley, and are we going to lose them to places like israel, canada everywhere. China . Everywhere. I was on the phone with a guy, cofounder of a Company Called true north. Theyre starting to set up subsidiaries for Tech Companies in Silicon Valley in canada who might have visa problems, might have a1b problems. I think theres uncertainty now. Even people he was saying he was getting calls even from people who arent from the seven countries, right. Theres just a lot of uncertainty about do i want to come to the United States, do i want do i want to deal with the hassle . I might not be muslim, of having to be i might look muslim, having to be stuck in the airport for three or four hours every time i want to go back and forth because Homeland Security wants to check them out more. It was interesting that he was saying that its a lot of startups that are starting to go and try to use his services there. And that makes me wonder what happens to the pipeline because a lot of these startups get bought up by bigger companies, and you know, sort of help drive that innovation of principles core principles. Thats what you wonder, where you balance shareholder value with core principles. Thats the clash. Well leave it there. Thank you to you both. Thank you. Thank you. Last week President Trump signed an executive order authorizing construction of a new wall along the u. S. mexico border and hiring up to 15,000 new Border Patrol and immigration reporters. John sepulveda is in san diego talking to residents about immigration and the proposed wall. He joins us from kpbs in san diego. Hi, john. Thanks for being with us. Reporter hi, thank you for having me. Youve been talking to supporters of President Trump in san diego. What are their thoughts on building a wall along the Mexican Border . Almost to a t most people dont want the wall. Thats because they already have a fence. The fences started in 1994 in california. And theyve seen that in large part it does not work. So they understand that a wall where it would go is in these extremely rugged areas. They know that it would be et cetera treatme it would be ex costly. Theyre more focused on the other parts of the immigration policy, specifically with President Trump and extreme vetting, making sure that people who are in the country and have committed crimes are deported. But almost to a t with the exception of one person i spoke to, nobody really wants a wall. What how do they feel about the muslim ban then . The one affecting seven muslim majority countries . Well, again, almost to a t, they all support it. And i think that shows the real difference between how people look at folks who have come illegally from over the border. The the general assumption is that most of those folks have come up here to work while there is this belief and i want to make it clear there are no facts to back up this belief there has been no instances of someone from a Refugee Community or who came to the United States as a refugee carrying out these types of attacks. But there is a belief that people from those countries do those kinds of things. So they think its a matter of security, and they support the ban. So what do you think are some of the factors perhaps behind that that the divergent views, if you will, on mexican immigration versus muslim immigration . Well, i think it really depends on who you talk to at any given moment. So im just going to give my general opinion, and i want to make it clear its my opinion based on the facts that i have seen. But based on those facts, i think that people are more comfortable down here with latino and other immigrants because they work with them every day. They see them at the store. Theyre in their communities and sometimes in their churches. Their kids definitely go to school with other peoples kids. So theres this theres a bigger immersion on this area, whereas with muslims, there as theres a large muslim and refugee contingent. In the town i grew up in, lemon grove, one of the biggest refugee settlement areas in the nation, not just in the california. But those communities are much more insular. They do not share the same faith. Theres a big disconnect between what people believe that they know about people and what they actually know about people. And i think that because those communities are insular and because theyre not as well understood, theres a greater amount of fear. I want to make it clear, thats my own opinion and analysis based on reporting on these these things for the past ten years. Sure. Congress has had to confront this issue of the physical barrier before. Why do you think the outcry seems so much more harsh and vocal this ti