don't have anything, as i think mr. caldwell did on fox last night, when they don't have anything, they charge conspiracy. first of all, those bologna generally, but particularly in this case when there is no crime of seditious for the reasons that you stated. but i do think, chris, there is an important message sent by this indictment that the department did not need to charge seditious conspiracy to charge all of these individuals with the same conduct. and they could have charged, as many of them were previously, with obstructing the lawful proceeding of counting the electoral votes in congress, which is a serious crime. but the department went further and i think that's notable because it really does stress and it underscores what you're saying, which is that this was one of the most catastrophic