enforced, why more hasn't been done, that's the answer that's given. that it would will trigger world war iii. and the white house senior officials that i've been talking to today's see a very distinct difference, both in the government assessment and in the military assessment between what's been going on, which is clear support for ukraine, the provision of defensive weapons, military aid, humanitarian aid, and so on, and u.s. forces actively engaged with russian troops on the ground, which is what a no fly zone would be. but they also see the provision of offensive weapons, fighter jets for instance, as an escalation. so as clint pointed out, why would it take? what would be the red line that needs to be crossed that the u.s. and maybe other nato nations feel -- on the, front a lot of the european senior fischel as i've talked to are very clear, it would have to be article five being triggered. he would have to be an attack on the nato site, or nato