> and circle back to acting chief of staff mick mulvaney's briefing yesterday where he attempted to walk back his statement admitting that "> > and circle back to acting chief of staff mick mulvaney's briefing yesterday where he attempted to walk back his statement admitting that " property="og:description"> > and circle back to acting chief of staff mick mulvaney's briefing yesterday where he attempted to walk back his statement admitting that ">
joe" later on. >> and circle back to acting chief of staff mick mulvaney's briefing yesterday where he attempted to walk back his statement admitting that the president held a quid pro quo. could what he said, anna, potentially be used against the president in the impeachment inquiry? >> oh, absolutely. it was such a stunning statement. i think everyone watching it was like did he actually say that. so we did see the white house trying to walk that back. and also distancing themselves from what mulvaney said. so there is going to be an effort to discredit that, to say he was speaking off the cuff, that he didn't necessarily mean what he was trying to imply there but this is certainly going to play into the investigation on capitol hill. and i expect that mick mulvaney himself to be called to testify because he played a role not only as the acting head of the office and budget management, responsible for that ukrainian aid but also as the acting chief of staff and orchestrating some of meetings that ended up facilitating this kind of parallel foreign policy led by